With every decision the cons on SCOTUS take us closer to autocratic rule

[Peter]

Whoa! I think I just got nailed with an "I know you are but what am I?" retort.

You insulted me and I responded.
What else did you expect?

 

[Fletch]

It's hilarious that you think him accurately describing your posts puts *his* credibility into question lol

He wasnt describing my posts. Cant you follow a simple discussion here?

 

[Fletch]

You insulted me and I responded.
What else did you expect?

You started the insult spree with the post I quoted, so you dont get to whine about it now.

 

[WisconIndependent]

Whoa! I think I just got nailed with an "I know you are but what am I?" retort.

You put a quote from Jefferson that seems opposite from what the cons on the court just did. They just took away the right to be free from illegal searchs, giving the tyrannical government to stop anyone they wanted for any reason they wanted by saying it was legal to stop any Latino or someone speaking Spanish. Neither of those is illegal or should be the reason for a stop and search. What next, if you have tattoo's, right they already are doing that.

 

[Fletch]

You put a quote from Jefferson that seems opposite from what the cons on the court just did. They just took away the right to be free from illegal searchs, giving the tyrannical government to stop anyone they wanted for any reason they wanted by saying it was legal to stop any Latino or someone speaking Spanish. Neither of those is illegal or should be the reason for a stop and search. What next, if you have tattoo's, right they already are doing that.

I havent read the opinion but I will. If your interpretation is correct I will likely agree with you. But I cant take your word that your claim is correct.

 

[noonereal]

They pass decisions that violate our constitution to give their boss, Trump, everything he wants. I wonder if they realize that they will be considered both the worst court ever and the one that ended our democracy
.

They are over educated culture warriors bending the constitution to what they want it to be.

 

[Peter]

You started the insult spree with the post I quoted, so you dont get to whine about it now.

By insult I assume you mean correctly pointing out how you post?

 

[Loulit01]

That is empty bluster. You're not making a rational argument.

You seem to think SCOTUS's Presidential immunity decision gives a President blanket immunity from any and all prosecution. That is simply wrong, and your Clinton and Nixon examples only prove to demonstrate you really don't know what you're talking about here.

Please be patient. I'm still looking for a word to suitably describe the inchoate imbecility of your posts.

 

[CaughtInThe]

This. Its time to fight back dirty.

Within the law.

 

[Blue Dog]

Calvinball jurisprudence Meaning | Politics by Dictionary.com

Calvinball jurisprudence is a term coined by Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in reference to the Court's recent decisions, which she described as adapting rules in real time in such a way that "[the Trump] Administration always wins.

www.dictionary.com

 

[Integrityrespec]

Seems democrats are confused about who is the legislative and executive branches of government. Far left judges need to be removed.

 

[Fletch]

By insult I assume you mean correctly pointing out how you post?

Boy, you cant follow a simple discussion here either. You began this with your post #64. Which was not a criticism of a post of mine.

 

[Fletch]

Please be patient. I'm still looking for a word to suitably describe the inchoate imbecility of your posts.

The problem is with your posts, not his. The way to handle an unlawful president is the impeachment process, not in front of a hackish, friendly judge in some random district courtroom

 

[NWRatCon]

I havent read the opinion

Which is why you continually post such stupid shit.

 

[bomberfox]

Within the law.

*sighs* fine but know this… you will be the only one expected to be within the law….

 

[NWRatCon]

They pass decisions that violate our constitution to give their boss, Trump, everything he wants. I wonder if they realize that they will be considered both the worst court ever and the one that ended our democracy
.

They're hoping that their fellow travelers will write that history and only laud them.

 

[Loulit01]

The problem is with your posts, not his. The way to handle an unlawful president is the impeachment process, not in front of a hackish, friendly judge in some random district courtroom

Your post is delightful. It posits you think you have a clue about what's going on. How cute.

 

[NatMorton]

Please be patient. I'm still looking for a word to suitably describe the inchoate imbecility of your posts.

Probably a good use of time as you've little hope for finding and making a reasonable argument.

 

[CLAX1911]

America never had it before.

Never had brain dead attacks on a president and former president before

The actually created it with no logical reasoning.

Really? Have you been lining on Mars the last ten years?

Not sure if that actually violates our constitution, but it sure stinks to high heaven.

You can't explain how though.