- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I agree.
Most Americans are stupid and they will vote for Obama again.
no. as of yet there is not a single Republican contender for the post that is not a superior alternative to the Navel Gazer in Chief.
If they do, it will be the fault of the GOP for not running an electable candidate. Palin, anyone? How about Newt?
WHoot…on hiccup noted…Charlie Sheen 'Winning' Over Sarah Palin .:mrgreen:
Among Independents
By ROBERT SCHLESINGER
Posted: March 17, 2011
<Among independent voters, “tiger blood” trumps “Mama Grizzly” genes, at least according to a poll released today by Public Policy Polling. >
Poll: Charlie Sheen 'Winning' Over Sarah Palin Among Independents - Robert Schlesinger (usnews.com)
While Obama cruses along with a comfortable 51% according to the latest Gallup.:2wave:
Why shouldn't Obama cruise when he has an entire media doing his dirty work for him?
j-mac
Nah, CORP media does what CORP media always does, looks out for CORP bottom line.:2wave:
Nah, CORP media does what CORP media always does, looks out for CORP bottom line.:2wave:
How is that "bottomline" for NY Times, CNN, MSNBC, and even the mainstream media NBC, CBS, and ABC? Seems that their ideology trumps common sense business practices thus shareholder value which is shrinking. News Corp however is doing quite well and News Corp owns Fox News.
no. as of yet there is not a single Republican contender for the post that is not a superior alternative to the Navel Gazer in Chief.
Why would anyone find that finding Fox news doing quite well surprising, after all Fox appeals to 51% of the registered voters who still don't believe that President Obama was born in America while another 23% are not sure. I listened to Fox last night as they tried to convince their loyal followers that our military should have been in Libya. We have a president who knows how to work within the International community. Fox has one priority and that is their ratings
Why would anyone find that finding Fox news doing quite well surprising, after all Fox appeals to 51% of the registered voters who still don't believe that President Obama was born in America while another 23% are not sure. I listened to Fox last night as they tried to convince their loyal followers that our military should have been in Libya. We have a president who knows how to work within the International community. Fox has one priority and that is their ratings
The networks, whether it is FOX or MSNBC, depend on advertising dollars to stay in business. Advertisers would rather play their propaganda to a larger audience than to a smaller one. The name of the game, therefore, is attracting an audience. The news networks, therefore, play what will attract the largest number of viewers, period. If a showman like Glenn Beck, for example, attracts an audience, then he stays on the air. If he fails to entertain enough people, then he's history. It is not a matter of ideology, or of reporting reality or facts, or of any spin one way or the other, but about advertising dollars.
Just like any other corporation, broadcasters are driven by the bottom line.
Like I said, approval polls mean nothing, the only poll that matters is the one taken on Nov 2012. Obama's poll numbers are greater than Ronald Reagan had going for his second term.Right, polls don't matter but results do. You seem to have no interest in results but continue to buy the Obama rhetoric. 15 million unemployed Americans, less employed today than when he took office, debt created will exceed Bush's at the end of fiscal year 2011, meager economic growth, the worst performance in history two years after a recession, the Middle East on fire, no leadership skills. The President isn't a contestent on American Idol so stop treating him like one by voting for him because you like him personally. He lacks leadership skills and the results are a disaster.
Like I said, approval polls mean nothing, the only poll that matters is the one taken on Nov 2012. Obama's poll numbers are greater than Ronald Reagan had going for his second term.
Much of the Debt and Deficit that you whine about was caused by Bush, you just can't legitimately blame it all on Obama.
Jobs, Jobs!!! Where are the jobs Mr. Boehner????
Like I said, approval polls mean nothing, the only poll that matters is the one taken on Nov 2012. Obama's poll numbers are greater than Ronald Reagan had going for his second term.
Much of the Debt and Deficit that you whine about was caused by Bush, you just can't legitimately blame it all on Obama.
Jobs, Jobs!!! Where are the jobs Mr. Boehner????
The elections in 2010 mattered as well. Public approval polls do mean something. They tell the administration statistically how most Americans feel. In a democracy the opinion of the people is something that is important. True, Bush did raise the deficit, but Obama has raised it by far more than any president in history. You say we can't blame it all on Obama, yet you are quick to blame the Republican Speaker of the House who has to work with a Democrat Senate and Executive branch.
That's easy, many of his supporters are not happy with his centrist polices, but that doesn't mean they will vote for a regressive Republican. That was my point. His poll numbers would be much higher if he been more liberal.I wonder how Obama supporters explain the drop in support from the 52% that voted for Obama? Could it be that more and more people are fed up with the rhetoric and actually looking at results?
That's easy, many of his supporters are not happy with his centrist polices, but that doesn't mean they will vote for a regressive Republican. That was my point. His poll numbers would be much higher if he been more liberal.
Who is going to beat him??
Now, since Fox is doing well due to the "birthers" why is it that liberal media is doing so poorly as that still leaves a lot of the public that still is there buying the Obama rhetoric? could it be that it isn't truly 51% of the registered voters that are watching Fox but instead people are watching Fox because they are sick and tired of the liberal spin coming from the rest of the networks? you see, trust but verify is what conservatives do and when you verify the Obama rhetoric you find results that don't measure up. You ought to try it some time. Name for me an economic or foreign relations success for Obama?
They watch it because people only want to watch things that don't challenge their opinions. It's complacency and laziness that leads to Fox News viewership.
Except with the liberal media that seems to be so arrogant that they refuse to change and give the people what they want which is the truth, not more rhetoric and promises.
Obama won the 2008 elections with 52% of the vote, he has lost much of that support due to performance and results. To make it any other issue is just a diversion. The people that supported him who now won't vote to re-elect him are seeing the results. Those that continue to support him still hear the rhetoric. Notice the difference?
If that's really true, then media will lose viewers, the advertisers will go elsewhere, and the "liberal media" will be a thing of the past. It's called competition, and it is inherent in a capitalist enterprise, like broadcasting. Broadcasters have to give the public what it wants.
There are super partisans on both sides that wouldn't vote for the opposing party under any circumstances. Those in the middle can be swayed one way or the other, but the Republicans are going to have to do better than Palin or Gingrich if they're going to prevail in the next election. Who do you think is going to run?
Americans usually vote for the incumbent for president if a crappy opposition is put up. Frankly, at this point, the only viable republicans who could beat Obama are the boring ones who nobody will like.The fact is the MSM including NY Times, CNN, MSNBC are losing viewers and losing money. That says it all. The fact remains Obama has lost significant support from the 52% he got in the last election and that is due to results as people hearing the flowering rhetoric are verifying that rhetoric by seeing results. Results matter and they aren't pretty. The Blame Bush rhetoric isn't working any more. On the plus side however Obama's golf game is improving.
Americans usually vote for the incumbent for president if a crappy opposition is put up. Frankly, at this point, the only viable republicans who could beat Obama are the boring ones who nobody will like.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?