Finally a governor that stands up for the Rights of Taxpayers and Property Owners.......God Bless America!
.
.
.
He's the "real" conservative 'round here, pardner.
People like you are why he changed his political lean.
he changed his lean to draw attention to himself, because that is his primary role on this forum.
Reading is fundamental, guy. My thread about changing my political lean from Conservative to Independent has been posted for quite some time, and my lean is also public. Just go to where my avatar is, and look below it. Do you need easier directions? :mrgreen:
In changing my political lean to Independent, I can still talk about the good old days of Goldwater, Buckley, and other great thinkers, without being saddled with the likes of Beck, Palin, and YOU. LOL. :mrgreen:
Actually, it's not. Changing my political lean was an honest move on my part. I suggest you read my thread in the partisan politics forum, before you start calling me names.
Actually, it's not. Changing my political lean was an honest move on my part. I suggest you read my thread in the partisan politics forum, before you start calling me names.
You are backing Unions over the People of the State of Wisconsin. :roll:
You are backing Unions over the People of the State of Wisconsin. :roll:
Breaking the law and setting the stage for a massive recall election...??
And most of those ineffective policies are in place because the union refuses to allow any innovation or experimentation, unless it directly benefits the union itself.
Sure, the unions love to tout any reforms that will increase the membership of the union, like small class sizes. It's the OTHER 90% of reforms that they block.
I'm sure that most teachers go into it to help children. That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that teachers' unions are cancers on society that protect bad teachers, inhibit education reforms, and overcharge taxpayers. Society would be far better off without them.
The People of the State of Wisconsin elected Walker as Governor to balance the budget, not to wage an ideological war against them.
The People of the State of Wisconsin elected Walker as Governor to balance the budget, not to wage an ideological war against them.
You are backing Unions over the People of the State of Wisconsin. :roll:
1. No
2. No
3. No
I also changed my lean.
the difference is I didn't feel complelled to make a vanity post about it.
Which, in this case, they're on in the same.
False. The Police and Fire Departments formally backed Scott Walker for governor and then turned on him when he went after collective bargaining. The GOP is overreaching.
One thing I always thought conservatives could understand was that people don't like it when you take away their rights - aren't they always whining about gun rights and the like - they're done.
Are you trying to say that every single person in WI is in a union?
Wisconsin Republicans vote to strip public worker collective bargaining rights without Dems
I don't know if they're cowards, they just risked a massive recall to carry out the agenda of a few billionaire GOP supporters...
I'd say they're just dumb cheeseheads.
You were forced too because I and others like me have been pointing out how... unconservative many of your views are. I applaud your move to a more honest labeling of where and who you are.
This just more proof that this fight was never about the budget.
I also changed my lean.
the difference is I didn't feel complelled to make a vanity post about it.
It is also no coincidence that the laws that caused the lending problem were enacted on Clintons watch. You of course don't have to believe me. Do some homework and you can see for yourself.
Hindesight is always 20/20 isn't it?
Same ole' talking points. You do of course realize that I am not a consevative right? You can find that out by looking through my 3000+ posts. As such your talking points mean nothing to me.
And yes there was a need. Study up on unions and see how they have continueally raised pay grades and demand more and more to the point where buisnesses and manufacturing companies move out of the country because of the demands that Unions make. Granted Unions are only part of the reason. But it is still there. And another view for you to look at. Why would there even be a need to cut pay and union benefits if it wasn't hurting US and State debts? If the US was "capable of meeting the demands"? Oh wait...you'll respond with the canned reply of "because they want to hurt the workers and not big buisnesses". Do you have any idea how stupid that sounds? Every single big buisness out there needs workers. Without them they cannot exist. Just as the workers cannot work without big buisness. It is a symbiotic relationship.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?