Wisconsin gov signs bill banning police chokeholds

[uptower]

Wisconsin governor signs bill banning police chokeholds

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers (D) signed a bill on Tuesday banning the use of police chokeholds except in limited circumstances. Under Senate Bill 121, a law enforcement agency “may not authorize the u…

thehill.com

I for one think the cops should be allowed to watch their wives do whoever they want...oh wait

 

[EMNofSeattle]

Wisconsin governor signs bill banning police chokeholds

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers (D) signed a bill on Tuesday banning the use of police chokeholds except in limited circumstances. Under Senate Bill 121, a law enforcement agency “may not authorize the u…

thehill.com

I for one think the cops should be allowed to watch their wives do whoever they want...oh wait

Really stupid, chokeholds are a great less lethal measure for achieving compliance over non compliant suspects. Nearly all of the claimed “deaths” from chokeholds are really drugged up people who died from Excited Delirium.

This of course how societies degenerate, when the alleged rights of criminals to commit crimes with no consequence is seen as a moral good. The one good thing though is that people will not stand to live in anarchy forever. Eventually this will lead to the overthrow of the regime if there’s no correction.

 

[uptower]

Really stupid, chokeholds are a great less lethal measure for achieving compliance over non compliant suspects. Nearly all of the claimed “deaths” from chokeholds are really drugged up people who died from Excited Delirium.

This of course how societies degenerate, when the alleged rights of criminals to commit crimes with no consequence is seen as a moral good. The one good thing though is that people will not stand to live in anarchy forever. Eventually this will lead to the overthrow of the regime if there’s no correction.

Nah I'm pretty sure 'Excited Delirium' is what white, conservative evangelical wives experienced when getting some black dude for the first time. I'm sure their 'chokehold' husbands - did I spell that right - will enjoy their brief moment of 'insurrection' before the inevitable arrests.

 

[braindrain]

Nah I'm pretty sure 'Excited Delirium' is what white, conservative evangelical wives experienced when getting some black dude for the first time. I'm sure their 'chokehold' husbands - did I spell that right - will enjoy their brief moment of 'insurrection' before the inevitable arrests.

You have some strange obsession there.

 

[Barros Serrano]

Really stupid, chokeholds are a great less lethal measure for achieving compliance over non compliant suspects. Nearly all of the claimed “deaths” from chokeholds are really drugged up people who died from Excited Delirium.

This of course how societies degenerate, when the alleged rights of criminals to commit crimes with no consequence is seen as a moral good. The one good thing though is that people will not stand to live in anarchy forever. Eventually this will lead to the overthrow of the regime if there’s no correction.

"the alleged rights of criminals to commit crime with no consequence"??? WHERE is that happening? Banning chokeholds is not equivalent to banning all consequence for crime, is it really?

So... the govt will be overthrown if cops can't use chokeholds. i'd love to hear more about your theory that civilization itself is dependent on the chokehold...

Yes, 5000 years ago in Sumeria the chokehold was invented, marking the rise of urbanization and civilized life. We must maintain the use of the chokehold unless we are to quickly dgenerate into drooling cave-dwellers chewing on raw rhino flanks.

 

[snakestretcher]

Really stupid, chokeholds are a great less lethal measure for achieving compliance over non compliant suspects. Nearly all of the claimed “deaths” from chokeholds are really drugged up people who died from Excited Delirium.

This of course how societies degenerate, when the alleged rights of criminals to commit crimes with no consequence is seen as a moral good. The one good thing though is that people will not stand to live in anarchy forever. Eventually this will lead to the overthrow of the regime if there’s no correction.

"Less lethal"? Why do you think the ban was implemented? The rest of your infantile rant is paranoid garbage.

Lawsuits for Police Chokehold Deaths

DETROIT - The nation became aware of the police chokehold maneuver after death of Eric Garner in the on July 17, 2014. The extensive use of that tactic came into further public view after the 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minnesota. Both men pleaded for their life and uttered “I can’t...

www.natlawreview.com

How Decades Of Bans On Police Chokeholds Have Fallen Short

A federal ban on police use of chokeholds has been discussed in recent weeks, but NPR reviewed the internal policies of several large U.S. police departments and found them difficult to enforce.

www.npr.org

Police chokeholds come under scrutiny around the world following George Floyd's death

The death of George Floyd in Minneapolis has renewed scrutiny of immobilization techniques long used in policing around the world.

www.latimes.com

 

[rocket88]

"the alleged rights of criminals to commit crime with no consequence"??? WHERE is that happening? Banning chokeholds is not equivalent to banning all consequence for crime, is it really?

So... the govt will be overthrown if cops can't use chokeholds. i'd love to hear more about your theory that civilization itself is dependent on the chokehold...

Yes, 5000 years ago in Sumeria the chokehold was invented, marking the rise of urbanization and civilized life. We must maintain the use of the chokehold unless we are to quickly dgenerate into drooling cave-dwellers chewing on raw rhino flanks.

He wants police to have a license to kill.

 

[rocket88]

Really stupid, chokeholds are a great less lethal measure for achieving compliance over non compliant suspects. Nearly all of the claimed “deaths” from chokeholds are really drugged up people who died from Excited Delirium.

This of course how societies degenerate, when the alleged rights of criminals to commit crimes with no consequence is seen as a moral good. The one good thing though is that people will not stand to live in anarchy forever. Eventually this will lead to the overthrow of the regime if there’s no correction.

You tried to overthrow the government. Maybe if your leader isn't a guy in a buffalo suit you'll win next time.

 

[snakestretcher]

He wants police to have a license to kill.

He also thinks brutal dictatorships are a great idea. A picture emerges...

 

[EMNofSeattle]

"Less lethal"? Why do you think the ban was implemented? The rest of your infantile rant is paranoid garbage.

Lawsuits for Police Chokehold Deaths

DETROIT - The nation became aware of the police chokehold maneuver after death of Eric Garner in the on July 17, 2014. The extensive use of that tactic came into further public view after the 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minnesota. Both men pleaded for their life and uttered “I can’t...

www.natlawreview.com

How Decades Of Bans On Police Chokeholds Have Fallen Short

A federal ban on police use of chokeholds has been discussed in recent weeks, but NPR reviewed the internal policies of several large U.S. police departments and found them difficult to enforce.

www.npr.org

Police chokeholds come under scrutiny around the world following George Floyd's death

The death of George Floyd in Minneapolis has renewed scrutiny of immobilization techniques long used in policing around the world.

www.latimes.com

“Lawsuits” is an issue that can be solved by implementing sovereign immunity. You shouldn’t have the right to sue the police department, many criminals who are subject to justified force or their families sue and get paid which creates a perverse incentive for lower class people to engage in crime or not properly parent their kids.

 

[EMNofSeattle]

He wants police to have a license to kill.

Isn’t that how you feel about Ashli Babbit?

 

[EMNofSeattle]

"the alleged rights of criminals to commit crime with no consequence"??? WHERE is that happening? Banning chokeholds is not equivalent to banning all consequence for crime, is it really?

So... the govt will be overthrown if cops can't use chokeholds. i'd love to hear more about your theory that civilization itself is dependent on the chokehold...

Yes, 5000 years ago in Sumeria the chokehold was invented, marking the rise of urbanization and civilized life. We must maintain the use of the chokehold unless we are to quickly dgenerate into drooling cave-dwellers chewing on raw rhino flanks.

Everywhere.

We just had it happen where a kangaroo court sent an honorable decorated officer named Derek Chauvin to prison, where one juror openly brags about lying during selection and making a guilty vote for activism, where a congresswoman came and engaged in political terrorism, etc.

We have people arguing that Michael Brown should’ve been allowed to steal from the store and take a cops gun, the liberal position on Freddy Gray is that insane knife law passed by leftists was not a justified reason to arrest him, oh what else? It seems the only police use of force they support is the killing of Babbit

 

[snakestretcher]

“Lawsuits” is an issue that can be solved by implementing sovereign immunity. You shouldn’t have the right to sue the police department, many criminals who are subject to justified force or their families sue and get paid which creates a perverse incentive for lower class people to engage in crime or not properly parent their kids.

Your insanely dumb and idiotic opinion is noted. You think cops should have carte blanche to do whatever they want, however brutal, with no consequences? The Nazis would have adored you.

 

[snakestretcher]

Everywhere.

We just had it happen where a kangaroo court sent an honorable decorated officer named Derek Chauvin to prison, where one juror openly brags about lying during selection and making a guilty vote for activism, where a congresswoman came and engaged in political terrorism, etc.

We have people arguing that Michael Brown should’ve been allowed to steal from the store and take a cops gun, the liberal position on Freddy Gray is that insane knife law passed by leftists was not a justified reason to arrest him, oh what else? It seems the only police use of force they support is the killing of Babbit

That "honourable" cop committed murder. What is wrong with you; a sadistic streak maybe, getting a thrill from seeing people die at the hands of untrained cops?

 

[EMNofSeattle]

Your insanely dumb and idiotic opinion is noted. You think cops should have carte blanche to do whatever they want, however brutal, with no consequences? The Nazis would have adored you.

No, I said criminals or their estates shouldn’t have the right to sue.

I think in some limited instances prosecutors should be allowed to bring charges, but only prosecutors who have direct experience being the victim of street thugs or dealing with them should be allowed to do so

 

[EMNofSeattle]

That "honourable" cop committed murder. What is wrong with you?

I didn’t write “honourable” I wrote “honorable” so you’re misquoting me. The proper way to quote if you don’t agree is “honorable [sic]”

Now that aside, it’s plainly obvious from the trial that it was not a murder and that the process was rigged for a conviction. It was a lynching done under color of law.

 

[snakestretcher]

No, I said criminals or their estates shouldn’t have the right to sue.

I think in some limited instances prosecutors should be allowed to bring charges, but only prosecutors who have direct experience being the victim of street thugs or dealing with them should be allowed to do so

I see, so only those with a personal bias should be allowed to judge. You are a genius in the mould of Donald Trump.

 

[EMNofSeattle]

I see, so only those with a personal bias should be allowed to judge. You are a genius in the mould of Donald Trump.

Everyone has a bias. Left wing college grads who live in a bubble where consequences of their activism do not affect them should not be making such decisions.

 

[snakestretcher]

I didn’t write “honourable” I wrote “honorable” so you’re misquoting me. The proper way to quote if you don’t agree is “honorable [sic]”

Now that aside, it’s plainly obvious from the trial that it was not a murder and that the process was rigged for a conviction. It was a lynching done under color of law.

"Honourable" is British English spelling so don't split hairs. Chauvin was tried by a jury of his peers; they found him guilty from the evidence presented to them, not anyone else.

 

[snakestretcher]

Everyone has a bias. Left wing college grads who live in a bubble where consequences of their activism do not affect them should not be making such decisions.

Sorry mate, your posts are utter garbage. A JURY decided Chauvin's fate. Of course you'd have to prove bias in all twelve of them. Go ahead...

 

[EMNofSeattle]

"Honourable" is British English spelling so don't split hairs. Chauvin was tried by a jury of his peers; they found him guilty from the evidence presented to them, not anyone else.

I didn’t write “honourable” so regardless of how you spell it you can’t quote that to me because I didn’t write it.

No, he was not tried by a “jury of his peers” none of his jury were victims of street thugs or had known experience using force against thugs.

 

[snakestretcher]

I didn’t write “honourable” so regardless of how you spell it you can’t quote that to me because I didn’t write it.

No, he was not tried by a “jury of his peers” none of his jury were victims of street thugs or had known experience using force against thugs.

Go away and do something useful. This forum is for adults, not the puerile who think vengeance is a good way to uphold the law.

 

[EMNofSeattle]

Sorry mate, your posts are utter garbage. A JURY decided Chauvin's fate. Of course you'd have to prove bias in all twelve of them. Go ahead...

No, since a conviction requires unanimous vote, you only have to prove one of them was not only biased but fraudulent. We can do that in the trial.

You can also show fear, because ranking congress people were instigating for race war and the state government had already shown they were not going to use force to stop black rioters

 

[EMNofSeattle]

Go away and do something useful. This forum is for adults.

Something useful would be deploying Derek Chauvins knee to this guy who executed a father on the streets of New York. Too bad the left views employed New Yorkers who aren’t black as sub human and doesn’t want police to protect them.

* sorry Chicago. All these cities are so bad now you can’t even tell anymore

Couple ambushed, shot outside their car in middle of Chicago street

A young father was shot dead and his girlfriend critically wounded after being yanked from their car on a crowded Chicago street over the weekend.

nypost.com

 

[Barros Serrano]

“Lawsuits” is an issue that can be solved by implementing sovereign immunity. You shouldn’t have the right to sue the police department, many criminals who are subject to justified force or their families sue and get paid which creates a perverse incentive for lower class people to engage in crime or not properly parent their kids.

This is an object lesson in blaming the victims.
Police with impunity? How about we just put little lighning-bolt insignias on their collars? Why take half measures?