• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will AI Negate Government Spying All Over The World?

I was talking about the spcific book mention in the article I cited.
Clearly your blanket statement is false
You are engaging in a fallacy, a single exception being presented as the majority case.

The facts are clearly that the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries.
Just admit it to yourself that this is the case. The facts are there.

Further, the left is supporting and purporting the distancing between a child and their parents


Parents being replaced by the State, just as in East Germany, as I posted earlier.

Parents are objecting to that, as well they should:


Again I was talking about the specific book I cited

Why is the extreme right trying to force their religious beleifs and morals (which they themselves do not follow) onto others?
This some sort of lame excuse for the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries?

When it comes to a child's welfare, the parents are first and foremost, and the left wants to take, or the State under their control, to take that place.

Pot meet kettle
 
I was talking about the spcific book mention in the article I cited.
Clearly your blanket statement is false
You are engaging in a fallacy, a single exception being presented as the majority case.

The facts are clearly that the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries.
Just admit it to yourself that this is the case. The facts are there.

Further, the left is supporting and purporting the distancing between a child and their parents


Parents being replaced by the State, just as in East Germany, as I posted earlier.

Parents are objecting to that, as well they should:


Again I was talking about the specific book I cited

Why is the extreme right trying to force their religious beleifs and morals (which they themselves do not follow) onto others?
This some sort of lame excuse for the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries?

When it comes to a child's welfare, the parents are first and foremost, and the left wants to take, or the State under their control, to take that place.

Pot meet kettle
 
You are engaging in a fallacy, a single exception being presented as the majority case.

The facts are clearly that the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries.
Just admit it to yourself that this is the case. The facts are there.
Yes the facts are there your blanket statement was false
Further, the left is supporting and purporting the distancing between a child and their parents


Parents being replaced by the State, just as in East Germany, as I posted earlier.

Parents are objecting to that, as well they should:



This some sort of lame excuse for the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries?

When it comes to a child's welfare, the parents are first and foremost, and the left wants to take, or the State under their control, to take that place.
OK you are on the far right no amount of relaity will ever enter your thougth processes
As i alreasdy proived to anyone who isnt a hyperpartisan the right will use AI to spy on its own people jsuust as easily as the left.
 
Yes the facts are there your blanket statement was false
If you believe in fallacies, which apparently you do.

OK you are on the far right no amount of relaity will ever enter your thougth processes
No, I'm not. Try guessing again.
Pro Tip: Just because someone doesn't agree with your positions and views, doesn't automatically make them 'far right'.

As i alreasdy proived to anyone who isnt a hyperpartisan the right will use AI to spy on its own people jsuust as easily as the left.
. . . and as cited, the left, i.e. the Biden administration, is already, and has been, brainstorming ways to spy on Americans who have committed no crimes.

Should spying enabling capabilities come to be, what makes you think they wouldn't use them?

Further, I think your assessment of the right being so ready to do the same is an exaggeration. No, not zero, but the left is already, and has been, advancing that spying agenda.
 
I guess it proposes the question do we want the absolute best technology in everyone’s hand or the very few, I think the latter
 
If you believe in fallacies, which apparently you do.


No, I'm not. Try guessing again.
Pro Tip: Just because someone doesn't agree with your positions and views, doesn't automatically make them 'far right'.


. . . and as cited, the left, i.e. the Biden administration, is already, and has been, brainstorming ways to spy on Americans who have committed no crimes.

Should spying enabling capabilities come to be, what makes you think they wouldn't use them?

Further, I think your assessment of the right being so ready to do the same is an exaggeration. No, not zero, but the left is already, and has been, advancing that spying agenda.
Right already did it so yeah you are wrong in your assessment
 
Back
Top Bottom