- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 77,900
- Reaction score
- 59,832
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You are engaging in a fallacy, a single exception being presented as the majority case.I was talking about the spcific book mention in the article I cited.
Clearly your blanket statement is false
The facts are clearly that the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries.
Just admit it to yourself that this is the case. The facts are there.
Further, the left is supporting and purporting the distancing between a child and their parents
California Senate approves ban on requiring schools to notify parents of child's pronoun change
The California Senate has approved a bill that would ban school districts from requiring teachers to notify parents if their child asks to go by a new pronoun at school.

Parents being replaced by the State, just as in East Germany, as I posted earlier.
Parents are objecting to that, as well they should:

Murrieta school board keeps parental notification policy, defying state order
The Murrieta Valley Board of Education voted on Friday to keep its controversial parental notification policy, defying a state order to rescind it.

Again I was talking about the specific book I cited
This some sort of lame excuse for the left is supporting and purporting content which the parents of their underage children find objectionable and inappropriate into those children's public school libraries?Why is the extreme right trying to force their religious beleifs and morals (which they themselves do not follow) onto others?
When it comes to a child's welfare, the parents are first and foremost, and the left wants to take, or the State under their control, to take that place.
Pot meet kettle