- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
KCConservative said:Another excuse for why a liberal prediction has't come true.
The whole Plame case wreaked of Rove from Day one. Look at what Rove did to McCain during the 2000 primaries.danarhea said:Because, at the last minute, Rove chose to cooperate with prosecutors in the Plame case. It was Rove who directed Fitzgerald to the Cheney emails. The investigation is a long ways from over, and if prosecutors are letting Rove off the hook, there has to be a mighty good reason. They are after bigger fish. If Rove is the means to a successful prosecution, then by all means, let him go.
Like they say in the judicial system, Lets make a deal.
Article is here.
What's your argument KC? Or like always, no argument at all just a lame statment to derail a thread?KCConservative said:Another excuse for why a liberal prediction has't come true.
Translation, you didn't bother to read the article at all, just decided to make another lame partisan attack on the dems.aquapub said:The quick answer to the title of this thread is:
Because he isn't the Disney Villain Democrats are falling all over themselves in Clintonite hypocrisy to portray him as.
danarhea said:Do you admit or deny that it was Karl Rove who directed Fitzgerald to the missing Cheney emails?
Do you admit or deny that the investigation is still ongoing?
Do you admit or deny that Rove is fully cooperating with prosecutors?
Those questions cannot be answered with yet another assinine remark from you. So step up to the plate and answer the questions.
Quit flaming, jfuh.jfuh said:What's your argument KC? Or like always, no argument at all just a lame statment to derail a thread?
Derail the thread? :lol: This thread is about Rove NOT being indicted. My comment is that this is an excuse by liberals because their original prediction of Rove going to jail went down the toilet. That is completely on topic. :lol: Go away, flamer!jfuh said:What's your argument KC? Or like always, no argument at all just a lame statment to derail a thread?
Do you just say this same thing to everyone?jfuh said:Translation, you didn't bother to read the article at all, just decided to make another lame partisan attack on the dems.
danarhea said:Because, at the last minute, Rove chose to cooperate with prosecutors in the Plame case. It was Rove who directed Fitzgerald to the Cheney emails. The investigation is a long ways from over, and if prosecutors are letting Rove off the hook, there has to be a mighty good reason. They are after bigger fish. If Rove is the means to a successful prosecution, then by all means, let him go.
Like they say in the judicial system, Lets make a deal.
Article is here
.
jfuh said:Translation, you didn't bother to read the article at all, just decided to make another lame partisan attack on the dems.
Careful. Jfuh says this kind of remark is out-of-bounds and that it has nothing to do with the topic. whatever.... :roll:easyt65 said:Because he wasn't guilty of anything, despite his Conviction in the Democratic Court of Public Opinion!
Innocence is no shield against indictment. Innocent people get indicted all the time. Also, guilty folks go without being indicted.Navy Pride said:Read my lips my liberal buddy he committed no crime...
Simon W. Moon said:Innocence is no shield against indictment. Innocent people get indicted all the time. Also, guilty folks go without being indicted.
Perhaps. But I suspect you're conflating the DNC's motivations w/ those of the Special Prosecutor.Navy Pride said:You can bet your *** Simon that if they had enough evidence to indict him they would havd done it long ago...........
KCConservative said:None of these questions were in your first post. Only after your feelings got hurt did you decide to ask questions.
Simon W. Moon said:Perhaps. But I suspect you're conflating the DNC's motivations w/ those of the Special Prosecutor.
Fitzgerald seems to have a different set of priorities and interests than the DNC. Prosecutors cut deals all the time.
Simon W. Moon said:Perhaps. But I suspect you're conflating the DNC's motivations w/ those of the Special Prosecutor.
Fitzgerald seems to have a different set of priorities and interests than the DNC. Prosecutors cut deals all the time.
danarhea said:Also, Fitzgerald is a lifelong Republican, who shows up at Republican party fundraisers, and supports Republican candidates. How does that make him a Democrat or a Liberal? It doesnt, but I still see the that same old lamo straw man argument about Democrats and Liberals conspiring against Rove from some people.
Nice flame.danarhea said:Actually, if one reads the article, these are the questions which would come to mind if one's IQ is higher than that of an artichoke.
This might be true if I were a dem.Navy Pride said:You dems make it so easy to do.........:rofl
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?