In Saudi Arabia, assassinate the sheiks who have control over the nuclear boobytrap on the oilfields.
Care to provide a citation backing up your claim that the US got oil or oil drilling, processing or transport contracts in Iraq?
Fortunately, COMMON SENSE, doesn't require a link.
Good day:2wave:
Have special forces secretly take the place of the oilfield workers. In Saudi Arabia, assassinate the sheiks who have control over the nuclear boobytrap on the oilfields. Let Russia take the Iranian side of the Persian Gulf and India occupy the Straits of Hormuz. China can take Indonesia and Brunei's oil. NATO gets North Africa's oilfields. Brazil gets Nigeria's. Partition, partitition, partition.
Good question, this is a lousy idea.
Colonization implies that one is greater/more advanced than the other.......and of course, Iraq is not buying this crap.
And, Its good that most here do not buy into colonization...
IMO, NO-ONE should have been colonized, ever...
There should be a "dislike" option.Have special forces secretly take the place of the oilfield workers. In Saudi Arabia, assassinate the sheiks who have control over the nuclear boobytrap on the oilfields. Let Russia take the Iranian side of the Persian Gulf and India occupy the Straits of Hormuz. China can take Indonesia and Brunei's oil. NATO gets North Africa's oilfields. Brazil gets Nigeria's. Partition, partitition, partition.
Well, we did "colonize" Iraq , in a way...and we are trying the same stupid thing in Afghanistan.tbh, if America wanted to colonize Iraq, we could do it tomoorow and not a damn thing the Iraqis can do about it. Don't ever underestimate the Big Dog on the block.
Starbucks anyone?
Well, we did "colonize" Iraq , in a way...and we are trying the same stupid thing in Afghanistan.
Well, we did "colonize" Iraq , in a way...and we are trying the same stupid thing in Afghanistan.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Where did you find this info? let me guess, from the Exxon HQ website...no wonder...
Before they realized what wusses our leaders are, the Saudis couldn't believe they could get away with charging us dozens of times over their oil-production costs. Not believing they could get away with price-gouging for long, they mined the oilfields to discourage a retaliatory takeover. If they can't have the oil gift and are powerless militarily from preventing us from taking it back, they have nothing to lose from making it unusable. The reason their boobytrapping the oilfields is not well known is that our Big Oil occupied regime doesn't want the American people to even think about taking charge of foreign oil again and bringing back reasonable prices.Who would booby trap their own country with nukes? Does that make any sense to you?
We did the same thing to the resources of America, "owned" but completely undeveloped by the Indians, who never would have developed them. Is the world better off than it was in 1492? Partitioning of backward tribes' natural resources is the reason we are all better off.a plan perhaps?
Until you see a Starbucks, a McDonalds, and a Porn shop, Iraq is not Colonized yet..lol
they mined the oilfields to discourage a retaliatory takeover. If they can't have the oil gift and are powerless militarily from preventing us from taking it back, they have nothing to lose from making it unusable.
The reason their boobytrapping the oilfields is not well known is that our Big Oil occupied regime doesn't want the American people to even think about taking charge of foreign oil again and bringing back reasonable prices.
they have a taco bell, burger king, KFC and an Anthony's pizza in Baghdad.
Right. all we want is the OIL.
Oops, apparently there is a Baghdad McDonald's. Opened in 2006.
We did the same thing to the resources of America, "owned" but completely undeveloped by the Indians, who never would have developed them. Is the world better off than it was in 1492? Partitioning of backward tribes' natural resources is the reason we are all better off.
they have a taco bell, burger king, KFC and an Anthony's pizza in Baghdad.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?