- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,358
- Reaction score
- 82,739
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
12/13/118
On Wednesday, while the political world was focused on the news that former Trump lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen had been sentenced to three years in prison for a variety of crimes, something else of potentially huge import got somewhat glossed over: American Media Inc., the parent company of the National Enquirer, admitted it had helped facilitate a hush payment to former Playboy model Karen McDougal and agreed to cooperate with the ongoing investigation being run by the Southern District of New York. That is a VERY big deal for two major reasons. First, AMI admitted that, in coordination with Trump's presidential campaign, it had paid McDougal $150,000 in the run-up to the election for the exclusive rights to her story that she had an affair with Donald Trump a decade earlier. Here's the exact wording from the SDNY press release on Wednesday;
So, AMI is acknowledging for the first time that not only did it make the payment to McDougal, which it has long lied about publicly, but it also did so in concert with Trump's campaign.
- "AMI admitted that it made the $150,000 payment in concert with a candidate's presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election."
The AMI settlement jibes with what we learned last week in the SDNY sentencing document on Cohen, in which the office makes clear they believe that Cohen made and sought to hide the payment to McDougal (as well as another six-figure payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels) at the direction and coordination of Trump.
Perhaps the most important thing that the AMI settlement does, however, is make clear that the payment and the coordination with the Trump campaign was, according to the SDNY release, done by AMI "to suppress the woman's story so as to prevent it from influencing the election." That's of critical import, because Trump's latest argument is that while Daniels and McDougal were clearly paid off -- remember that he has long denied that -- it had nothing to do with his campaign or his prospects of winning. AMI is admitting in their settlement deal that the goal of catching and killing McDougal's story was "to prevent it from influencing the election." Which means that the $150,000 amounted to an in-kind contribution to the campaign -- and broke campaign finance law. In short: We may look back on Wednesday -- when this is all said and done -- as not the day that Michael Cohen got sentenced, but rather the day that AMI started working with the feds.
Don't care...next.
Don't care...next.
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump
CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump
The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump
CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump
The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
Party before country, got it.
I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.
One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all. Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump
CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump
The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
Think about this; if AMI didn't pay off McDougal and Clinton won the election would McDougal's story have been an "in kind" contribution to Clinton?
I know, everything is the end of Trump. Rather than take the totalitarian route of criminalizing your political opposition, why not take the democratic route and come up with a candidate who can beat him in 23 months?
One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all. Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump
CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump
The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
Think about this; if AMI didn't pay off McDougal and Clinton won the election would McDougal's story have been an "in kind" contribution to Clinton?
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump
CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump
The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
Don't care...next.
It was only a matter of time.
Late tonight after a bucket of fried chicken, 6 diet cokes and 2 scoops of ice cream Individual-1 will tweet it’s a hoax staged by Alex Baldwin and Cohen to fool Pecker and frame Individual-1. Tomorrow Trump fans will be repeating Trump’s tweet and defending Trump’s, ah, you know, honor and ****.
Breaking news: CNN doesn't like Trump. Stay tuned for further information.
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump
CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump
The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
Party before country, got it.
One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all.
Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.
Are you arguing that false "facts" being disseminated on Facebook and elsewhere, shown to be orchestrated by Russians, didn't change anything? How do you know that? Are you magic?
Do you not believe that facts are VITAL to a functioning democracy and, by default, a corrupted information stream is harmful? Can people be expected to vote correctly, in your opinion, when they are forced to consume bull**** as "truth"? Or, is that just the status quo for conservatives? This is another case of astonishingly, stupidly naïve denials by conservatives. Would you accept it as irrelevant if the Russians had worked for Clinton? Of course not. You'd be hysterical.
Don't let your personal ambivalence to facts become an assumption for all America. Some of us still care.
I think Trump and Putin believe it too.
So, an illegal act is ok, in your opinion, if it did not change the results?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?