• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,358
Reaction score
82,739
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Why the National Enquirer cooperation deal is a VERY big problem for Donald Trump


CEO David Pecker of AMI and Donald Trump


The blue above. That is a criminal campaign finance violation and a felony. Both Micheal Cohen and AMI have testified that Individual-1 (Donald Trump) was a co-conspirator.
 

It was only a matter of time.

Late tonight after a bucket of fried chicken, 6 diet cokes and 2 scoops of ice cream Individual-1 will tweet it’s a hoax staged by Alex Baldwin and Cohen to fool Pecker and frame Individual-1. Tomorrow Trump fans will be repeating Trump’s tweet and defending Trump’s, ah, you know, honor and ****.
 

I know, everything is the end of Trump. Rather than take the totalitarian route of criminalizing your political opposition, why not take the democratic route and come up with a candidate who can beat him in 23 months?
 
Party before country, got it.

One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all. Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.
 
One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all. Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.

So, an illegal act is ok, in your opinion, if it did not change the results?
 
Think about this; if AMI didn't pay off McDougal and Clinton won the election would McDougal's story have been an "in kind" contribution to Clinton?

No because there was no coordination between MaDougal and Clinton.

You are welcome!! :lol:
 
I know, everything is the end of Trump. Rather than take the totalitarian route of criminalizing your political opposition, why not take the democratic route and come up with a candidate who can beat him in 23 months?

LOL, criminalizing your political opposition? LOL

You mean like when Republicans investigated Hillary for lying about Benghazi, subpoenaed her emails util they found a petty crime and tried to lock her up? Republicans are still angry that Hillary is not in prison for email mismanagement.

 
One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all. Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.

If anyone here could judge idiot's.....
 
Think about this; if AMI didn't pay off McDougal and Clinton won the election would McDougal's story have been an "in kind" contribution to Clinton?

Tortured logic is not how the law works. Try again.
 
Don't care...next.

I remember vividly Watergate and about halfway through people like you saying they don't care, oblivious to the reality that surrounds the landscape.
 

agreed .... plus he will say that just being in the room means nothing as he tuned them out since he was not part of the conversation and really has no idea what they were talking about. Ray Charles can see this coming and he is both dead and blind.
 

ROTFLOL... it’s no BIG DEAL...

Purchasing exclusive rights to stories to kill them happens all the time. There’s a term for it.

It’s hilarious watching Leftists eagerly eat every morsel of dog vomit that passes their yaps.
 
One would need to be an idiot to think it would have changed the election results at all.

Are you arguing that false "facts" being disseminated on Facebook and elsewhere, shown to be orchestrated by Russians, didn't change anything? How do you know that? Are you magic?

Do you not believe that facts are VITAL to a functioning democracy and, by default, a corrupted information stream is harmful? Can people be expected to vote correctly, in your opinion, when they are forced to consume bull**** as "truth"? Or, is that just the status quo for conservatives? This is another case of astonishingly, stupidly naïve denials by conservatives. Would you accept it as irrelevant if the Russians had worked for Clinton? Of course not. You'd be hysterical.

Don't let your personal ambivalence to facts become an assumption for all America. Some of us still care.


Of course those same idiots believe Russia did.

I think Trump and Putin believe it too.
 


Good grief, man!

According to the left, Trump got elected by conservative middle-aged white men and their wives who were told by their husbands who to vote for ... they're not exactly the facebook clientele.

If anybody was "affected" (grin) by Russian ads on facebook, it will have been the Bernie supporters. :lamo
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…