• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Is There Outrage The Hillary Clinton Lost?

Why Is There Outrage Hillary Clinton Lost The Presidential Election?

  • She was a paragon of integrity

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • She was a bold member of Congress

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • She had a slew of successes as Sec. State, especially in Libya

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Her high morale character was unmatched

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • She represented change from the status quo

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .
He does not show leadership which as the head of a powerful country is needed. Manual not required.

In your opinion, which you are certainly welcome to, but does not actually mean a damn thing.
 

But we don't elect a president based on popular vote, so what the hell difference does it make? Or maybe you're making the only point you can because you have nothing more intelligent to say.
 
And anyone on DP who tries to state their opinions as facts is just as wrong as you are.

I did not say it is facts. It is my opinion which I am entitled to state on an open forum. I'm not wrong in stating my observation.
 
But we don't elect a president based on popular vote, so what the hell difference does it make? Or maybe you're making the only point you can because you have nothing more intelligent to say.

The question was, why are people outraged that Hillary Clinton lost, and I said because she was the popular vote, but not the president. If the question were, why did Hillary Clinton not become president, I would have nothing to say re: the popular vote, but that wasn't the question.

So, I'm left with a question for you. Since the above should be pretty obvious to anyone who took the time to read the thread, are you taking a shot at me because your partisan knee jerk reflex got away on you, or is it because you have nothing more intelligent to say?
 
I think it's more complicated than the OP posits. Sure, some ppl are outraged Hillary didn't win, but the the more important confrontation isn't Trump/GOP vs Hillary/Democrats, but Trump vs. Establishment, which sets Trump and his supporters against many GOP legislators, effectively all Dem legislators, the political donor class he snubbed during his campaign, most major media outlets, and the courts. I think much of this is counted as "normal" GOP/Democrat resistance which is only a small part of the effort.

The outrage is a product of the Establishment's efforts to stop Trump from getting a foothold on any major policy effort. So far, they have been successful at wrongfooting Trump at every turn, to the point that he has been unable to enact some common Presidential powers, such as temporarily stopping emigration.

I don't like Trump much, but I did have some hope that his approach might trigger some good policy chances that might break our deadlocks on several issues. Having elected him, we need to allow him his term.

Instead, the Establishment has gone berserk at the insult of an outsider getting the "big" chair. They are throwing aside rationality completely, and treating this as a holy war. What could Trump do with a term as President that would threaten these types? I haven't the foggiest. They're throwing away any semblance of fair procedure to quash him, though.

However you feel about Trump, he's made many of the right enemies. Everyone loves an underdogs with gumption. It remains to be seen if he can actually get anything of substance done, but this is the job he asked for, so he'd better get on with it.
 

Then people are idiots because they don't care how American politics actually works. It all comes down to the same thing. Trump was elected fair and square. When are people going to grow up and get over being butthurt?
 
Then people are idiots because they don't care how American politics actually works. It all comes down to the same thing. Trump was elected fair and square. When are people going to grow up and get over being butthurt?

No, they're not idiots, come on...lol... Hating your president / prime minister / whoever is part of the democratic experience... There's always a "losing side", and they always bitch and moan about the guy who won. It's why there's freedom of speech to begin with. People are never going to grow up and get over being butthurt, because people are people, and given the divisive nature of the election, had it turned out that HRC won the damn thing, the Right would be just as sore about it. Case in point, I could turn around and ask you when are the right going to grow up and get over being butthurt about the left being butthurt?

Being butthurt is probably one of the most definitive elements of what it means to be an American, from what I can see, both in the being butthurt, and the encouraging of butthurt in others. C'mon, Cephus, you know I'm right...even if you're too butthurt to admit it. lolz
 
I. Never. Said. She. Won. A. Majority.
It must have been those darn Russians that hacked your computer and made you post this...
Actually, the majority of votes cast were cast for HRC.
Yes, you did move the goal posts later and say she won the popular vote, which is completely irrelevant to how our elections work.
 
It must have been those darn Russians that hacked your computer and made you post this...

Yes, you did move the goal posts later and say she won the popular vote, which is completely irrelevant to how our elections work.

Ya, dude, your dead baby comment in the other thread has kind of made me too sick to my stomach to talk to you anymore. Whatever works for ya, man.
 
I get how your voting system works, but it still doesn't mean people are happy about it.

Exactly.

People continually whining about the Popular Vote are basically Falcon Fans whining "if only the game was 3 quarters". It's a pointless whine only ever engaged in by the losers of a contest who are bothered that the actual rules they were operating under, from the very start, led to their defeat despite having success in ways that are utterly meaningless within the overall scope of "winning" and "losing".

But losing sucks, and losing to an entity you detest sucks even more. So the natural human reaction to such a thing is to find a way to sooth ones mind and the pain of losing by latching onto such things.

It's similar to how some Caps fans will once again be trying to convince themselves this playoff flame out doesn't hurt as bad, because ultimately we lost to the guys who won the Cup so we just got screwed by the ****ty playoffs seeding.
 

lol...yup. But, and I'm just sayin here, you can always change the stuff you don't like. Electoral reform was a election issue last time around in Canada, moving from First Past the Post to looking at other systems, such as Proportional Representation. It didn't end up going anywhere, because no clear consensus could be found, so it stayed the same, but we had the conversation in a meaningful way, and had there been a more visible consensus, it would have been done.

I always find it weird how Americans think their constitution is carved in stone when it's all about amendments. If you don't like the way it is (consistently, regardless of whether your guy wins because of it) then put forward the mandate to government to sort it out. Of course, that's assuming the government obeys the mandate of the people...
 
Ya, dude, your dead baby comment in the other thread has kind of made me too sick to my stomach to talk to you anymore. Whatever works for ya, man.
I know it's humiliating to refuse to acknowledge you claimed Hillary won the majority of votes which is patently false. Then to be shown that your "she got the most votes" is utterly irrelevant. It is best if you run along now.
 
I know it's humiliating to refuse to acknowledge you claimed Hillary won the majority of votes which is patently false. Then to be shown that your "she got the most votes" is utterly irrelevant. It is best if you run along now.

"Hillary won the majority of votes which is patently false."

Is it?
 
Have not the actions and decisions of Trump been oriented to America's interest first? Sure, a campaign slogan, but it would be ONLY a campaign slogan if he didn't follow through, which it would appear that he is.
The only thing Trump has done in the best interests of America was pulling out of the TPP, and even then I'm not convinced his motivation was actually "it's in the best interests of America".

Every other thing he has done that I am aware of is a negative for America.
 
I was one of the most blatant Hillary supporters here. i had her in my sig for months. Lesser of two evils from my perspective. She lost.

I learned the hard lesson when I was a Gore supporter. let it go.

It cannot be changed.
 
I didn't see the option "because they utterly hate Trump" up there. That's the only reason I believe there's so much outrage. If it was any other of the republican candidates there wouldn't be this level of outrage.
 
Oh really. Please, take me down that slippery slope.



If I "fall silent" on the topic, it's because you've brought nothing of value for me to debate, which is pretty much par for the course.

Nice. Arrogant liberalism at its finest.


The EPA, and many other federal bureaucracies, have been bloated and excessively intrusive for many, many years already (as all bureaucracies inevitably become). This excessive bloat had little positive effect and a great many detrimental effect in the cost of doing business here in the US. Why have so many jobs fled from the US? That's one of the reasons. High time to trim them both (the bureaucracies and the regulations) back to something a bit more 'normal'.

I didn't hear about any trade wars going on. Sure you aren't imaging those?

he's done nothing but piss off our allies (I love how righties screamed that Obama was alienating our allies when he really never did, and now are totally cool with Trump telling numerous longstanding friends to go take a flying piss);

Uhh. Yeah, right.


Fair enough, as there were many who thought that Obama's policies were horrible as well. What I can't tolerate or accept is the level of vileness in the personal attacks against the Trump family which aren't even in the spotlight, such as Barron. He's a 10 year old kid for Christ's sake! No rational judgement or self control from the left? Instead, from the tolerant left :roll: we see virtual beheading and virtual assassinations. Were it an honest policy debate, fine, but this? Its as far from honest or policy as you can get. Proof that the political left wants to make the country ungovernable, to the detriment of the nation, so clearly, ideology and party over nation (with Soros funding).

Grow up and get over your butt hurt. The political right had to endure 8 years of Obama, and to a great extent, that is a contributing factor to Trump being elected, and no, you don't get to claim exemption from that contributory responsibility.

You seem to expect everyone on "the left" to just roll over and let Trump do whatever he wants, despite the constant pushback against Obama from conservatives for eight years. Well, no. **** Donald Trump and **** his idiot supporters.

Nice personal attack. Not at all as if those that disagree with your political positions and opinions have a right to them at all. :roll:
The old Seems more truer now than ever before. The right things the left is wrong, and the left thinks the right is an evil to be vanquished.

Not at all. The left is free to disagree. But I do expect some sort of adulting, policy based, and rational, but then again, that may be too much to expect from those that make their political decisions with their feelings (and BTW, I have similar criticisms from the far right as well). So if you want to be taken seriously, then bring seriousness to the discussion, and not just vindictiveness and vile.

And yeah, I'm pissed off at Hillary and the DNC for blowing the layup and allowing this jerkoff to get in the Oval Office. Doesn't mean I can't be upset with Trump too.

I think the illusion / delusion all along the campaign was that it was Hillary's 'layup'. The coronation that wasn't, to the surprise of many, and mostly her supporters. So whom of the right end of the political spectrum caused this illusion / delusion anyway?
 

Ah yes, conservatives were oh-so-nice to Obama's family.

Your whole post, as per usual, is "the lefties are so much meaner." Horsehockey.
 
Ah yes, conservatives were oh-so-nice to Obama's family.

Your whole post, as per usual, is "the lefties are so much meaner." Horsehockey.

Of course I expect such a response, rather than a point by point discussion, which I afforded you.

In actuality, were or were not Sasha and Malia left alone for the vast majority of news coverage? Come on now. Be honest.
I don't think there were more than a few stories and if negative, were roundly, and quite appropriately, criticized.

Further in actuality, the left has become viscous and vile to any and all political opponent for not believing same as they, achieving a new low, far more so than any others. An escalation that really does no one any good.

Was Obama accused of being a '**** holster' for anyone? On National TV no less?
Funny, don't recall anything coming even close to that.

Here's an idea: Hey left! Keep it classy! (for a change)
 

Word is Hillary excoriated her staff for not coming up with a reason she was running!
 

Your selective memory is growing tiresome. But hey, anything to cast oneself as the victim, amirite?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…