• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?

That's a straight up lie. Why would you lie like that?
IOt would violate the rights of individual states and be suicide for the party because there are lots of irresponsible people who want to use abortion as birth control.
 
IOt would violate the rights of individual states and be suicide for the party because there are lots of irresponsible people who want to use abortion as birth control.
Individuals had the right. Your tram took it away. Stop lying.
 
We haven’t forgot.

Who is it?

On its face then, the Court’s silence some two months after Justice Roberts announced an investigation into what he termed an “egregious breach”—the assault on the institution of the Court that was the leak of the draft Dobbs opinion that would prevail, returning the question of abortion to its rightful place within the states—is itself an egregious breach.

As the Associated Press recently reported, the Court is at present mum on whether it’s still even investigating the leak, as well as on a host of other basic questions about the probe.

 
Back
Top Bottom