Oh she's a racist go after race!
Funny, when it's POSITIVE go after colour of skin it's OK
But when it's NEGATIVE go after colour of skin it's RACISM
Then stop telling your colour of skin, problem SOLVED!!
For two reasons.
1. To pander to people who think her race or sex matters
2. To piss off people who think her race or sex matters
If you don't fall into either category its not an issue.
She couldn't say she is the only woman in the Senate
She couldn't say she is the only dem woman in the Senate
She can say she is the only black woman in the Senate
And that is racism!
If you think that is racism you’re in need of a dictionary to look the word up or you are using the left wing nut version of racism to refer to anything you don’t like. Either way you are using the word wrong.
The fact is that she is the only black woman in the senate. Why do the rightwing nut jobs hate facts
Ok who was saying she wasn’t?
Oh she's a racist go after race!
Funny, when it's POSITIVE go after colour of skin it's OK
But when it's NEGATIVE go after colour of skin it's RACISM
Then stop telling your colour of skin, problem SOLVED!!
Saying you can’t speak facts is ludicrous
Who is saying she can’t speak facts?
Why are you complaining about the facts she speaks. Would you rather she ignore the facts
Where did I complain about the facts she spoke?
She's just pointing out that the senate is still just a country club for mostly rich white guys and she managed to break in. This pisses them off just like when Tiger Woods had to be allowed to play at Augusta National.
So what is your reason for bringing it up.
She couldn't say she is the only woman in the Senate
She couldn't say she is the only dem woman in the Senate
She can say she is the only black woman in the Senate
And that is racism!
Bringing what up? I didn’t start the thread.
Conservatives can't talk about race without making fools out of themselves. I guess it's the lesson they'll never learn.
So why are you posting on it. You asked who is saying she can’t speak facts. I suggest you ask that to the thread starter. This is what the thread is about
I'm going to guess that you didn't have an educated friend proofread this for you.
You are the one who intended the exchange with me on a reply I made about the OP miss using the term racism. So if you want to accuse me of saying Senator Harris can’t bring up facts or claim I am ignoring facts then point to were I did such a thing in this thread and we can discuss it If you are unwilling to do so then I suggest you give up this misguided attempt at trying to argue about something I am not even doing and move on to the next issue.
I replied with a statement. Wasn't personal. Sorry you took it that way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?