• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Did Modi Call India’s Muslims ‘Infiltrators’? Because He Could.

Pyrite

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 8, 2023
Messages
31,772
Reaction score
35,325
Location
Ohio, USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Liberal

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, his power at home secured and his Hindu-first vision deeply entrenched, has set his sights in recent years on a role as a global statesman, riding India’s economic and diplomatic rise. In doing so, he has distanced himself from his party’s staple work of polarizing India’s diverse population along religious lines for its own electoral gain.

His silence provided tacit backing as vigilante groups continued to target non-Hindu minority groups and as members of his party routinely used hateful and racist language, even in Parliament, against the largest of those groups, India’s 200 million Muslims. With the pot kept boiling, Mr. Modi’s subtle dog whistles — with references to Muslim dress or burial places — could go a long way domestically while providing enough deniability to ensure that red carpets remained rolled out abroad for the man leading the world’s largest democracy.

Just what drove the prime minister to break with this calculated pattern in a fiery campaign speech on Sunday — when he referred to Muslims by name as “infiltrators” with “more children” who would get India’s wealth if his opponents took power — has been hotly debated. It could be a sign of anxiety that his standing with voters is not as firm as believed, analysts said. Or it could be just a reflexive expression of the kind of divisive religious ideology that has fueled his politics from the start.

But the brazenness made clear that Mr. Modi sees few checks on his enormous power. At home, watchdog institutions have been largely bent to the will of his Bharatiya Janata Party, or B.J.P. Abroad, partners increasingly turn a blind eye to what Mr. Modi is doing in India as they embrace the country as a democratic counterweight to China....
 
Even though it happened less than a year ago, I had forgotten about the assassination of a Sikh in Canada - and Trudeau's accusation.

From the article:

"Unlike the CIA in the U.S. or CSIS in Canada, which operate at arm's length from their respective governments, RAW reports directly to India's prime minister. There is no Parliamentary oversight."

A troubling reality, especially given Modi's history of authoritarianism and anti-Muslim activism.
 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, his power at home secured and his Hindu-first vision deeply entrenched, has set his sights in recent years on a role as a global statesman, riding India’s economic and diplomatic rise. In doing so, he has distanced himself from his party’s staple work of polarizing India’s diverse population along religious lines for its own electoral gain.

His silence provided tacit backing as vigilante groups continued to target non-Hindu minority groups and as members of his party routinely used hateful and racist language, even in Parliament, against the largest of those groups, India’s 200 million Muslims. With the pot kept boiling, Mr. Modi’s subtle dog whistles — with references to Muslim dress or burial places — could go a long way domestically while providing enough deniability to ensure that red carpets remained rolled out abroad for the man leading the world’s largest democracy.

Just what drove the prime minister to break with this calculated pattern in a fiery campaign speech on Sunday — when he referred to Muslims by name as “infiltrators” with “more children” who would get India’s wealth if his opponents took power — has been hotly debated. It could be a sign of anxiety that his standing with voters is not as firm as believed, analysts said. Or it could be just a reflexive expression of the kind of divisive religious ideology that has fueled his politics from the start.

But the brazenness made clear that Mr. Modi sees few checks on his enormous power. At home, watchdog institutions have been largely bent to the will of his Bharatiya Janata Party, or B.J.P. Abroad, partners increasingly turn a blind eye to what Mr. Modi is doing in India as they embrace the country as a democratic counterweight to China....

...Over his decade in national power, Mr. Modi has been deeply effective in advancing some of the central items of the Hindu-right agenda. He abolished the semi-autonomy of the Muslim-majority state of Jammu and Kashmir. He enacted a citizenship law widely viewed as prejudiced against Muslims. And he helped see through the construction of a grand temple to the Hindu deity Ram on a plot long disputed between Hindus and Muslims.

More profoundly, Mr. Modi has shown that the broader goals of a Hindu state can largely be achieved within the bounds of India’s constitution — by co-opting the institutions meant to protect equality.

Officials in his party have a ready rebuttal to any complaint along these lines. How could Mr. Modi discriminate against anyone, they say, if all Indian citizens benefit equally from his government’s robust welfare offerings — of toilets, of roofs over heads, of monthly rations?

That argument, analysts say, is telling in showing how Mr. Modi has redefined democratic power not as leadership within checks and balances, but as the broad generosity of a strongman, even as he has redefined citizenship in practice to make clear there is a second class....
 
Not good at all, especially given India's history of treating Muslims poorly.

What, no mention of why there are Muslims there in the first place? No mention of the fact that Muslims waged a bloody conquest of India circa 1200? Doncha just hate those 'fact' thingies?


Btw, I am NOT defending Modi, so please don't go there.
 
I see you are unimpressed by 824 year old history. I was just about to post about this almost millennial old outrage in Breaking News but the cuneiform tablets seem to be paywalled.
 
I see you are unimpressed by 824 year old history. I was just about to post about this almost millennial old outrage in Breaking News but the cuneiform tablets seem to be paywalled.

That's the best you can do?

India is now smaller than it used to be specifically because of the Muslim conquests and murder of untold numbers of Hindus. Why on earth would that lead to anything other than permanent anamosity?

Anything even remotely critical of Islam always receives this sort of knee-jerk 'defense' by the usual group. Muslims invaded India. Therefore they are not liked there. What a ******* surprise.
 
I see you are unimpressed by 824 year old history. I was just about to post about this almost millennial old outrage in Breaking News but the cuneiform tablets seem to be paywalled.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

I'll see if I can find some papyrus for you...
 
I see you are unimpressed by 824 year old history. I was just about to post about this almost millennial old outrage in Breaking News but the cuneiform tablets seem to be paywalled.

Why some people are so damned proud of their ignorance is beyond me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests_in_the_Indian_subcontinent

Aurangzeb​

The reign of Aurangzeb (1658–1707) witnessed one of the strongest campaigns of religious violence in the Mughal Empire's history. Aurangzeb is a controversial figure in modern India, often remembered as a "vile oppressor of Hindus".[239] During his rule Aurangzeb expanded the Mughal Empire, conquering much of southern India through long bloody campaigns against non-Muslims. He forcibly converted Hindus to Islam and destroyed Hindu temples.[240][241] He also re-introduced the jizya, a tax on non-Muslims,[242] which had been suspended for the previous 100 years by his great-grandfather Akbar.
 
Modi is not very fond of India's Christian minority either. He is pretty much against everyone not a Hindu.
 
Back
Top Bottom