Much as I hate to agree with him, Karl Rove has a point. In 2016 Bernie Sanders won NH by 22 points. Rove says, "That won't happen again. This vote is fragmented." He went on to explain that for the first time ever, we have five candidates getting delegates in Iowa--the main four and Klobuchar. NH is similarly splintered.
Bernie is on home turf. He is expected to win and leads the polling average by over four points. The race for second and third is interesting. Biden is already conceding he won't win, probably meaning he expects another fourth place finish. Warren is also from next door, though NH has more in common with Vermont than Massachusetts. However, she is third. Mayor Pete tied Sanders in Iowa and seems to resonate with the state. The surprise in Iowa, and a much whispered name, is Amy Klobuchar. A number of pundits consider her a viable darkhorse, because she is a natural second choice for Biden's supporters and a female alternative to Warren.
I would have made a poll, but there are too many possibilities to map out in five minutes.
Who wins if not Bernie?
Who is second?
Which of the big four finishes fourth, or fifth?
Who or what is the surprise?
Much as I hate to agree with him, Karl Rove has a point. In 2016 Bernie Sanders won NH by 22 points. Rove says, "That won't happen again. This vote is fragmented." He went on to explain that for the first time ever, we have five candidates getting delegates in Iowa--the main four and Klobuchar. NH is similarly splintered.
Bernie is on home turf. He is expected to win and leads the polling average by over four points. The race for second and third is interesting. Biden is already conceding he won't win, probably meaning he expects another fourth place finish. Warren is also from next door, though NH has more in common with Vermont than Massachusetts. However, she is third. Mayor Pete tied Sanders in Iowa and seems to resonate with the state. The surprise in Iowa, and a much whispered name, is Amy Klobuchar. A number of pundits consider her a viable darkhorse, because she is a natural second choice for Biden's supporters and a female alternative to Warren.
I would have made a poll, but there are too many possibilities to map out in five minutes.
Who wins if not Bernie?
Who is second?
Which of the big four finishes fourth, or fifth?
Who or what is the surprise?
Bern, easily. In a national election, Trump would not get 43% of NH against Bern.Who wins NH?
DJT.
Bern, easily. In a national election, Trump would not get 43% of NH against Bern.
Much as I hate to agree with him, Karl Rove has a point. In 2016 Bernie Sanders won NH by 22 points. Rove says, "That won't happen again. This vote is fragmented." He went on to explain that for the first time ever, we have five candidates getting delegates in Iowa--the main four and Klobuchar. NH is similarly splintered.
Bernie is on home turf. He is expected to win and leads the polling average by over four points. The race for second and third is interesting. Biden is already conceding he won't win, probably meaning he expects another fourth place finish. Warren is also from next door, though NH has more in common with Vermont than Massachusetts. However, she is third. Mayor Pete tied Sanders in Iowa and seems to resonate with the state. The surprise in Iowa, and a much whispered name, is Amy Klobuchar. A number of pundits consider her a viable darkhorse, because she is a natural second choice for Biden's supporters and a female alternative to Warren.
I would have made a poll, but there are too many possibilities to map out in five minutes.
Who wins if not Bernie?
Who is second?
Which of the big four finishes fourth, or fifth?
Who or what is the surprise?
I'm calling it. Based on several seconds of vigorous research, I'm calling the results, in descending order (In terms of delgates awarded) Is Bernie, Buttigieg, Warren, Biden, Amy.
Much as I hate to agree with him, Karl Rove has a point. In 2016 Bernie Sanders won NH by 22 points. Rove says, "That won't happen again. This vote is fragmented." He went on to explain that for the first time ever, we have five candidates getting delegates in Iowa--the main four and Klobuchar. NH is similarly splintered.
Bernie is on home turf. He is expected to win and leads the polling average by over four points. The race for second and third is interesting. Biden is already conceding he won't win, probably meaning he expects another fourth place finish. Warren is also from next door, though NH has more in common with Vermont than Massachusetts. However, she is third. Mayor Pete tied Sanders in Iowa and seems to resonate with the state. The surprise in Iowa, and a much whispered name, is Amy Klobuchar. A number of pundits consider her a viable darkhorse, because she is a natural second choice for Biden's supporters and a female alternative to Warren.
I would have made a poll, but there are too many possibilities to map out in five minutes.
Who wins if not Bernie?
Who is second?
Which of the big four finishes fourth, or fifth?
Who or what is the surprise?
Bern, easily. In a national election, Trump would not get 43% of NH against Bern.
I think that's a given. He's polling 4-6 points ahead. The problem is that it's expected and he won by 22% against Hillary.I would say it is between Pete and Bernie.
they are pretty much tied at this point, but
Sanders needs a solid win here.
The Republicans unexpectedly had a record turnout in Iowa. Another is expected tomorrow. There is a massive enthusiasm gap between the parties.Trump wins by a blow out
I think that's a given. He's polling 4-6 points ahead. The problem is that it's expected and he won by 22% against Hillary.
In the broader sense, the real question has to do with lower finishes.
The Republicans unexpectedly had a record turnout in Iowa. Another is expected tomorrow. There is a massive enthusiasm gap between the parties.
In your dreams, but not in reality. Did you not see the record Republican turnout in Iowa, even with an uncontested Presidential nomination? Republican enthusiasm is far higher.Indeed, the GOP is trailing in the enthusiasm factor.
I think that's a given. He's polling 4-6 points ahead. The problem is that it's expected and he won by 22% against Hillary.
In the broader sense, the real question has to do with lower finishes.
The Republicans unexpectedly had a record turnout in Iowa. Another is expected tomorrow. There is a massive enthusiasm gap between the parties.
It's past worry. They stirred up a big vote in 2018 on the promise of impeaching Trump. Now, that promise has come due and the payoff is insufficient. The DNC is dealing with a seriously irritated base. Add that to the lackluster group of candidates, Trump's momentum and the expectation of Durham producing indictments against Obama people. It makes for a dejected bunch of potential voters. People still hate Trump, but they are getting resigned to losing the point.This is something that has the DNC worried they were expecting a ton of trump hate and were expecting bigger than usual turn out for the primary.
they are getting hillary clinton level or worse.
I think Bloomberg benefits the most from not having a clear frontrunner before super Tuesday
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?