- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 34,817
- Reaction score
- 18,576
- Location
- Look to your right... I'm that guy.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
"Picking the lesser of two evils" and "supporting the status quo" is more semantics for the same end result. The individual voter's motivation or rationalization is less important if the end result is the same regardless.Voting for one of the 'big two' for president is not supporting the status quo. It is picking the lesser of two evils. Which must be done to minimize damage while a third party
comes up into the system, first locally, state, then into the legislature. They can not just jump in and take the white house. That's crazy talk.
So once the election results are in, I will know you voted for whoever the winner is, based on throwing away a vote.
TDid you even look at my lean?
I've answered all your questions in full and to satisfactory levels.
Sorry guy, you went up against someone you shouldn’t. You can’t beat me. As I said, get a little of that intellectual integrity and come back. I don’t care for childish arguments which push no philosophy or debate.
I have been here long enough to know that what people put as their 'lean' doesn't mean **** for the most part around here.
You JUST answered what 'party' you have worked for... only after throwing out some sort of lame attempt at an attack.
Yeah, sure that's it. Yet another big ego that things far too much of himself. Around here? Go figure. :roll:
You should really quit kidding yourself.
And if you think the 'libertarian' party stands a chance, well, I can't help but laugh.
Then you've been here "long enough" to know my arguments. All self-consistent.
That was rather self-evident though.
As for the ego thing, I have well proven that point; you may call me Doctor.
Ah yes, the big ego thinks others actually pay attention. Until this thread, I have never noticed you. But thanks for thinking so much of yourself.
Yes, because so many peoples 'lean's are off base, that means yours must be solid. :roll:
I have no doubt you constantly believe you 'prove' things. It is a symptom of the your narcississm. And believe me, the last thing I'd ever call you is doctor.
And believe me, the last thing I'd ever call you is doctor.
Both of you egotists should stay away from pins and needles.
It's my title. I have a PhD.
You do know a vote for a 3rd party is a vote for Hussein Obama right?
So is it your goal to prove a high level degree has nothing to do with one's intelligence, or did that just sort of happen all on it's own?
It's my title. I have a PhD.
That is the beauty of DP. You can have 20 PHDs if you like.......:lamo
You could. I actually have one in Physics though.
Whatevet floats your boat........I am actually Clint Eastwood in real life...............
I'm all for DC voting rights, but this is about the Presidential election, not Congressional representation. DC residents do in fact get electoral votes when it comes time to vote for the President.
Fewer than everyone else in the country. Every state gets two more electors simply by virtue of being a state. DC should, too.
Fewer than everyone else in the country. Every state gets two more electors simply by virtue of being a state. DC should, too.
You're about the right age, I can buy it.
Fewer than everyone else in the country. Every state gets two more electors simply by virtue of being a state. DC should, too.
You're about the right age, I can buy it.
You went ahead and made my day:mrgreen:
More than memorization, we need a good IQ test. If you're not a classic academic, you can't vote. No dumb people f'n us over so much.
Is this sarcasm? Honestly! I can't tell!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?