- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 67,179
- Reaction score
- 30,405
- Location
- Rolesville, NC
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Well, no most federal mandates are not about "individual rights" they're about special rights for certain voting classes.
Also most people have virtually no working knowledge of government, or are extremely self interested to the point of ignoring the larger picture. Which is why a legislative assembly who understands having to government and meet certain obligations can sometimes make a better decision then masses of self-interested people.
It took you over a month to post that.
The criteria are within the link posted earlier, please read it, I don't have time for your drive-by nonsense.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
No one asked but you, the rest were intelligent enough to just read the information at the link.Can't post if I haven't been here and the only nonsense is you avoiding what multiple posters asked so the issues is yours.
No one asked but you, the rest were intelligent enough to just read the information at the link.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
I would like to eliminate the Senate entirely because it gives low population, rural, and Republican states an advantage over high population, urban, and Democrat states.
As long as we have a Senate I want it to be elected by the voters.
I want to reduce or eliminate the power of money in American politics, and make the government more democratic. A more democratic government would of course be a more Democrat government.
IT would also be violative of most rights.
Nonsense.
lets do some thinking
if we had a true democracy would abortion have been legal in 1973
would sodomy bans be overturned
gay marriage?
I doubt you even considered those things that were court imposed against the popular will
I have no idea why you might think that issues like sodomy and abortion are big deals for me. They aren't.
Both were settled by the conservative Burger court.
Nor are we talking about true democracy. We're talking of the limited step of direct election of senators, a non-issue until very recently.
Why, all of a sudden, are we openly opposed to direct election of senators or even true democracy?
I believe it is Vladimir's will. I believe it is in America's best interest to lock Trump up.
JMHO.
Nonsense.
IT would also be violative of most rights.
Although my candidates often lose elections, I trust the majority of the voters more than I trust any minority, whether it be a minority based on wealth, birth, or intellect.
Then you are blind. And deaf.
I don't. when more people can tell you who won last month's Survivor or American Idol than can name the justices on the USSC or their own two senators, I don't want pure democracy.
I'm not the topic of this thread.
Turtledude post 134IT would also be violative of most rights.
Howard the Duck post 135Nonsense
PirateMk1 post 139Then you are blind. And deaf.
You made yourself the part of the thread with your answer. See.
Turtledude post 134
Howard the Duck post 135
PirateMk1 post 139
Expressing my opinion doesn't extend to you the right to change the topic to me. Notice how I expressed my opinion without personally attacking turtledude.
Really? Your opinion is noted, and rejected.
Expressing my opinion doesn't extend to you the right to change the topic to me. Notice how I expressed my opinion without personally attacking turtledude.
And yet you complied. My work here is done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?