- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 4,377
- Reaction score
- 2,433
- Location
- NW Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Neither one. The voters are.
That is a curious answer, because whenever I go to the polls, I have three choices, well, three choices that matter....
I can vote Democrat, Republican or just not vote, and something tells me, that none of those choices would improve things much. As a voter, I'm not really sure how "I" can change things in any effective way. The only people that have time, that is, can walk away from their jobs without seriously affecting their personal fiances are the wealthy...>They have time AND money. So it's a very catchy thing to say that it's the "voters" fault, but I'm not sure, in this day and age what any voter can realistically do about it.
I'd really the the option to cast my ballot for neither and while it's not realistic to put no one in office, I think if the "nether" vote exceeds 50%?, 60%?....On the next ballot there should be a third party subsidized, for at least one year, if not more, by the Gov......At least that way, there is a real possibility of change.
I blame a system that has been corrupted by the influence of money and the idea that we are "individuals" in a nation that is increasingly unaware how our fortunes are in some sense linked.
A false choice is still a false choice. I cannot recall many elections where I did not have other choices. Whether or not you choose to fall into their trap is up to you. Vote third party, write in, start a third party, stop buying into the endless redherrings, hold your representatives at all levels accountable, don't vote, run for office. Being in Virginia you do not get to write-in for President, but you can for any other office.
If we were not influenced by resources, we would not make deals, and, there would be no war. our cells need fuel and to rest. this is why we need to make deals, eventually, at an economic level between various degrees of 'business.' if you were to be a communist, you would share what you have in a utopian society. this requires a high moral code, as it is easy to abuse power. we need money to represent resources - it is the 'image' of things we want.
Democracy is to blame.
Lobbyists.
This is just a symptom of the influence money has on our government, no?
I blame a system that has been corrupted by the influence of money and the idea that we are "individuals" in a nation that is increasingly unaware how our fortunes are in some sense linked.
That is a curious answer, because whenever I go to the polls, I have three choices, well, three choices that matter....
I can vote Democrat, Republican or just not vote, and something tells me, that none of those choices would improve things much. As a voter, I'm not really sure how "I" can change things in any effective way. The only people that have time, that is, can walk away from their jobs without seriously affecting their personal fiances are the wealthy...>They have time AND money. So it's a very catchy thing to say that it's the "voters" fault, but I'm not sure, in this day and age what any voter can realistically do about it.
I'd really the the option to cast my ballot for neither and while it's not realistic to put no one in office, I think if the "nether" vote exceeds 50%?, 60%?....On the next ballot there should be a third party subsidized, for at least one year, if not more, by the Gov......At least that way, there is a real possibility of change.
I thought that congress had the 'power of the purse strings'. That being the case, and I recall Nixon didn't want to spend what congress wanted to spend, took him to court and made him spend it.
So, seems to me quite reasonable that congress and their spending be blamed for the debt.
That is a curious answer, because whenever I go to the polls, I have three choices, well, three choices that matter....
I can vote Democrat, Republican or just not vote, and something tells me, that none of those choices would improve things much. As a voter, I'm not really sure how "I" can change things in any effective way. The only people that have time, that is, can walk away from their jobs without seriously affecting their personal fiances are the wealthy...>They have time AND money. So it's a very catchy thing to say that it's the "voters" fault, but I'm not sure, in this day and age what any voter can realistically do about it.
I'd really the the option to cast my ballot for neither and while it's not realistic to put no one in office, I think if the "nether" vote exceeds 50%?, 60%?....On the next ballot there should be a third party subsidized, for at least one year, if not more, by the Gov......At least that way, there is a real possibility of change.
Influence of money from whom? Both sides are awash in cash from both sides of the political spectrum. So arguing money is the problem is ignoring the real problem.
Or you can quit bitching and run yourself, work for a candidate, or form your own party.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPysuSaF4iA
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?