Onion Eater
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2008
- Messages
- 753
- Reaction score
- 139
- Location
- Scottsdale, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
T. Mosley said:Austrian economics is based off of observations (i.e. empiricism) of human behavior for several hundred years. Based off of those observations, it is possible to make certain predictions as to what the result of similar behavior today will be. From that same empiricism, it is possible to construct a logical framework which can be used to explain most or all human social behavior and decision making, and what effect any number of events might have on such decisions.
Certain axioms might also become apparent during such study.
Ludwig von Mises said:Praxeology is a theoretical and systematic, not a historical, science. Its scope is human action as such, irrespective of all environmental, accidental, and individual circumstances of the concrete acts. Its cognition is purely formal and general without reference to the material content and the particular features of the actual case. It aims at knowledge valid for all instances in which the conditions exactly correspond to those implied in its assumptions and inferences. Its statements and propositions are not derived from experience. They are, like those of logic and mathematics, a priori. They are not subject to verification or falsification on the ground of experience and facts. They are both logically and temporally antecedent to any comprehension of historical facts. They are a necessary requirement of any intellectual grasp of historical events. Without them we should not be able to see in the course of events anything else than kaleidoscopic change and chaotic muddle.
Mises explains the a priori nature of the assumptions of Austrian economics much better than T. Mosley. What Mosley writes sounds more like modern Keynesianism than Austrian economics.
Peter J. Boettke said:Theodore A. Burczak's Socialism after Hayek is a thoroughly researched and thoughtful examination not only of the ideological debate that framed the twentieth century, but of Hayek's intellectual framework. Burczak hopes for an economic framework that is both humanistic in its approach and humanitarian in its concern while being grounded in good reasons. The book should be on the reading list of every comparative political economist and in particular anyone who wants to take Hayek seriously, including those who would like to push Hayek's classical liberal politics toward the left in the twenty-first century. Burczak has made an outstanding contribution to the fields of political and economic thought and to Hayek studies in particular.
Who has the authority to define Austrian economics?
I tell you, in the small farming community from which I hail, this question forms almost the sole topic of conversation.
I would say not though. Sure, the guy was intelligent, and his works are great, but you don't have to be an AnCap to follow Austrian economics.
I wouldn't say no benefits, I mean, police are useful. But net benefit? That's a different story. Just read some of Human Action; Mises has plenty of room for police and even government sponsored education, roads, etc.
I'm planning on it sooner or later. But to be honest I don't see how giving other people the right to initiate force upon others is as useful as private arbitration and fairness through competition.
If the authority for that force comes from all people then it's fine. AnCap always seemed to me a system that basically would develop into countries as well since the only institution that could use force against you would be something you choose to participate in. A competing police force cannot touch you.
I don't understand if you are supporting a private police force or not here hahaha. Government police forces are most definitely not supported by everyone, and government police forces do arrest innocent people, like in America arresting people for having the wrong plant in their pocket.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?