- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 29,957
- Reaction score
- 14,683
- Location
- Netherlands
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Grooming gangs tend to victimize dozens and sometimes hundreds of children, which the average lone groomer doesn't. Grooming gangs are more of a danger for that reason. But besides that, I didn't lie anyway. The article I based my thread on said that 84% of men convicted of child grooming since 2005 were Asian.
The vast majority of men convicted of grooming young white girls – 84 per cent – are of Asian origin, according to a report to be published this week.
The study by the renowned counter-extremism think-tank Quilliam says that of these, seven in ten are believed to be of Pakistani-Muslim heritage.
Asian gangs have deliberately abused white girls because they hold entrenched racist attitudes towards them as being ‘easy targets’ for sex, according to the report, which is based on the testimonies of convicted Asian men during court hearings.
The study – likely to provoke controversy – is written by two British Pakistani authors, who say they hope it will encourage their community to ‘take responsibility’.
https://www.debatepolitics.com/euro...ex-grooming-cases.html?highlight=84%+grooming
Where was the lie? I stated what was printed online by a news organization.
The report faced fierce criticism from academic researchers. Ella Cockbain, a lecturer in security and crime science, is an expert on child sexual exploitation. She said it “is a case study in bad science: riddled with errors, inconsistencies, a glaring lack of transparency, sweeping claims and gross generalisations unfounded its own ‘data’”.
Using “extensive data mining methods”, Quilliam researchers found 58 cases between 2005 and 2017, leading to 264 convictions for “group-based CSE involving grooming tactics”. There is no information as to where the data comes from, how it was selected or how ethnicity identified. Of the 264, 222 were Asian, hence the figure of 84% of grooming gang offenders being Asian. Just 18 were white.
Critics have pointed out, however, that even a casual media search produces far more white perpetrators of group CSE who seem to have been ignored by Adil and Rafiq. And 58 cases over a period of 12 years seems exceptionally low. As the Quilliam report itself notes, a Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) study found 57 cases of Type 1 offending (in Quilliam’s eyes, the equivalent of grooming gangs) in 2012 alone. Rafiq told me he was unsure about the reasons for the disparity but that it may be a difference between grooming cases and court convictions
There's probably already law against comedy in the Netherlands. We must not offend the 3% of Netherlands that is gay, black or jewish!
You
- posted false information about grooming gangs
- became irate when I posted about foreign doctors in the UK being unqualified to practice medicine
lied about Sadiq Khan's ties to radical Muslim Louis Farrakhan
Go on. Say you didn't.
I believe the statistic you're grasping for is; '84% of grooming gang members are Asian', or more succinctly, Pakistani.
British-Pakistani researchers say 84% of grooming gang members are Asian: 'It's very important we talk about it' | The Independent
Quite apart from you lying your head off here once again, let's see if you actually have the cojones to accuse anyone here outright of excusing grooming gangs.You yourself lied about the Cologne sex assault spree that occurred. You've also lied when you said there was no police cover up. Imagine that, one subversive shilling for another subversive. 'What goes round comes round'.
Nope, those would be the followers of Donald Trump.
Considering that conservatives have been trying to fight history since at least 1865, your comment is rather ironic.
Conservatives have been fighting history since 1865? oh ...this ought to be a great example of leftist darwinism.
Please give us your very best example of conservatives fighting history.
Conservatives have been fighting history since 1865? oh ...this ought to be a great example of leftist darwinism.
Please give us your very best example of conservatives fighting history.
For those interested...he never did give an example. He just bailed.
The “Lost Cause” was invented by conservatives and perpetuated by conservatives literally up until...today
And considering conservatives hero worship a narcissistic con-man who brags about how he drinks water, your snide little whining about “leftists” is pretty meaningless.
For those interested....”Alpha Omega” humiliated himself....again.
I asked for an example of fighting history but it is a great freudian slip on your part that you equate fighting history and preserving it. That sums up lefties perfectly and confirms my belief in how they actually think. Thanks for this!
It's adorable how you think that.
For those interested....”Alpha Omega” humiliated himself....again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?