• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which gun control measure would you prefer?

Which gun control measure would you prefer?

  • 1. Provide free mental health care to crazy people.

    Votes: 7 87.5%
  • 2. You must get a permit issued to you by a trained psychiatrist

    Votes: 2 25.0%

  • Total voters
    8
No, I gave you the evidence - you're the one choosing to ignore it



So you're admitting that a lead sometimes ***IS*** good and therefore helps to solve a gun related crime

Thank you for contradicting your own flat-Earth position and supporting my case.

Cheers.
Yep.. a lead can be good if it leads to an arrest and conviction.
Can you please give me the data on convictions using the database. You know..the evidence you say is in the article..
Oh wait..it isn't there.
You can stick to your flat earth faith.
I'll stick with science and facts.
Cheers.
 
Yep.. a lead can be good if it leads to an arrest and conviction.

And since the database has provided a 78% increase in leads, would it not be fair to say it is responsible for an increase (maybe not a 78% increase) in convictions ?

Can you please give me the data on convictions using the database. You know..the evidence you say is in the article..

The 78% bit


Oh wait..it isn't there.

See above

You can stick to your flat earth faith.
I'll stick with science and facts.
Cheers.

You keep denying the evidence like a good flat Earther.
And I note you ignore the 2nd article:

"Microstamping and ballistics identification can reduce gun violence by improving the solve rate of gun-related crimes."


More evidence for you to ignore.
 
And since the database has provided a 78% increase in leads, would it not be fair to say it is responsible for an increase (maybe not a 78% increase) in convictions ?



The 78% bit




See above



You keep denying the evidence like a good flat Earther.
And I note you ignore the 2nd article:

"Microstamping and ballistics identification can reduce gun violence by improving the solve rate of gun-related crimes."


More evidence for you to ignore.
I'll stick with science and facts ..thank you very much.
 
I'll stick with science and facts ..thank you very much.

The accept the findings of the report and not blindly accept facts without evidence*

*That's what flat Earthers and religious creationists do.
 
Back
Top Bottom