- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
- Messages
- 12,047
- Reaction score
- 2,509
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
So, a young Jewish man asks, "Where is the SON mentioned in the Tanakh?" And he is shown by another Hebrew man!
In context of the entire Bible, there is only ONE SON. You seem intent to deny CHRIST HIS rightful place. You should take up Hebrew in a University or College. You are being manipulated by what and how the JW organization wishes you to believe.The concept of a "son" is represented by the Hebrew word "ben" (בֵּן) and its plural "banim" (בנים) or "bnei" (בְּנֵי)
.
This word appears frequently throughout the Hebrew Bible, carrying various meanings:
Direct male offspring: This is the most straightforward meaning, referring to a biological child.
Descendants or posterity: It can refer to a person's future generations, not just direct children, according to Bible Hub.
Members of a group or class: For example, "sons of the prophets" refers to members of a prophetic guild, not necessarily biological descendants of prophets.
Individuals or groups associated with a particular place or characteristic: For example, "sons of Zion" refers to the inhabitants of Zion.
Figurative or idiomatic uses:
It can indicate likeness, nature, destiny, or relationship.
"Son of Belial" refers to a worthless or wicked person.
"Sons of death" refers to those destined to die.
"Son of consolation" is a descriptive term, as in the case of Barnabas.
Important passages and contexts:
Psalm 2:7: "You are my Son; today I have begotten you," according to TorahBytes. This verse is often interpreted as referring to the ideal Davidic king or the Messiah, highlighting a special relationship with God rather than a physical begetting.
2 Samuel 7:14: God says to David, "I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son". This can be understood as referring to both Solomon and the future Messiah.
Exodus 4:22: God refers to Israel as His "firstborn son", highlighting a special covenantal relationship rather than biological parentage.
The phrase "sons of God" (בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים - bənê hāʼĕlōhîm):
This phrase appears in various contexts, including Job 1:6, Job 2:1, Job 38:7, and Deuteronomy 32:8.
Interpretations vary, with some suggesting it refers to angelic beings, while others understand it to refer to humans who have a special relationship with God.
The Hebrew word "ben" and its related forms provide a rich and multifaceted understanding of the term "son" in the Hebrew Bible. It extends beyond a purely biological definition to encompass concepts of lineage, group membership, character, and relationship with God.
of course Jesus cannot apear in the OT.Are you taking about Jesus?
If so, the answer is: nowhere.
It's the reason I left Christianity after 20 years.
I suppose not, but neither is he prophesied in the OT either.of course Jesus cannot apear in the OT.
That's debatable.I suppose not, but neither is he prophesied in the OT either.
Of course it is, but I can tell you I dedicated several months to the study of the topic, and I personally was not able to find sufficient "evidence" of the person who was to be NT Jesus being predicted/prophesied in the Hebrew bible. It was the reason that I, a Christian at the time for 20 years, left the religion.That's debatable.
You must be nearsighted. There are Jews who have been read this and think that they are being read from the New Testament.Of course it is, but I can tell you I dedicated several months to the study of the topic, and I personally was not able to find sufficient "evidence" of the person who was to be NT Jesus being predicted/prophesied in the Hebrew bible. It was the reason that I, a Christian at the time for 20 years, left the religion.
Seems to me like a strange angle to approach a problem. Why not look at the evidence of the Resurrection and work your way back?Of course it is, but I can tell you I dedicated several months to the study of the topic, and I personally was not able to find sufficient "evidence" of the person who was to be NT Jesus being predicted/prophesied in the Hebrew bible. It was the reason that I, a Christian at the time for 20 years, left the religion.
There is no evidence of any resurrection outside of the bible.Seems to me like a strange angle to approach a problem. Why not look at the evidence of the Resurrection and work your way back?
Why demean the Bible as less than what would constitute evidence on outside the Bible, yet look for evidence for the Messiah within it?There is no evidence of any resurrection outside of the bible.
No, I wanted to know why Jews did not accept Jesus as their Messiah. I found out why by studying their scripture.
Because at the time I was a Christian and believed in the resurrection.Why demean the Bible as less than what would constitute evidence on outside the Bible, yet look for evidence for the Messiah within it?
Seems to be a very inconsistent approach.
Don't get it. You are looking for evidence of a foretold Messiah in the Bible, while simultaneously discrediting the Bible as a standard of evidence for the Messiah.Because at the time I was a Christian and believed in the resurrection.
So, a young Jewish man asks, "Where is the SON mentioned in the Tanakh?" And he is shown by another Hebrew man!
No, that is my current position. At the time I believed all of the scriptures were "true".Don't get it. You are looking for evidence of a foretold Messiah in the Bible, while simultaneously discrediting the Bible as a standard of evidence for the Messiah.
You're trapped in a loop.