• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What supporting human rights, attacked by powerful forces, looks like

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
59,498
Reaction score
30,378
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Imagine you see oppression, injustice, people harmed and murdered, and decide to oppose it speaking out. Imagine the forces and their allies doing the wrong, then attack you. Imagine you make a video answering them. It might look a lot like this.

 
Too much to watch a video, hm? After all the noise about the topic... There are good things to learn from this.
 
A lack of interest in a country guilty of human rights abuses smearing its critics, including the Biden administration supporting the smears officially.

Putin jails his critics. MBS murdered a US critic. Israel launches political attacks and smears. No one is interested in the topic, no wonder they get away with murder. How about calling the White House to criticize the wrong position it took? No wonder trump is one of the two leading candidates.
 
Imagine you see oppression, injustice, people harmed and murdered, and decide to oppose it speaking out. Imagine the forces and their allies doing the wrong, then attack you. Imagine you make a video answering them. It might look a lot like this.


Waters showed up in Berlin in a Nazi getup and he made excuses for Putzin's murderous invasion of Ukraine.

He deserves nothing but scorn.
 
I was recently made aware of or reminded of some other Waters' views, which I very much disagree with. He seems to be in a camp of people I think are wrongly one-sided in some of their morality, leaving them with some valid points but missing others including bigger ones.

In particular I'm referring to his defense of China's government. He made a comment in response to the government's wrongs that China didn't invade Iraq and cause all the harm that did.

Well, ok. That's a comment you see about China, pointing to their low level of attacking other countries. Their defenders usually overstate it claiming they have never attacked another country, but it's a fair point that the west has a much worse history of it.

But it can't be left there - ignoring how terrible in other ways the regime is, and how oppressive to their own people, much less the other people they have control over, Tibet, Mongolia, Hong Kong, Uyghurs, soon Taiwan, off the top of my head.

This is a danger of these issues - that essentially anyone who didn't do the Holocaust is not as bad as Hitler, therefore not so bad. China's wrongs whitewash US wrongs, US wrongs whitewash China wrongs, and so on. There is a larger context.

This is some of the harm that blind defenders of the US or the west do - by wrongly refusing to acknowledge wrongs, they invalidate criticism of others like Putin and China. 'Our murders' don't matter, theirs do. It has the effect of harming human rights. That's not false equivalency; there isn't equivalency, but there is a lot more shared wrong than they admit.

In other words, China SHOULD be strongly condemned; Putin SHOULD be strongly condemned; but so should some acts by the US and others, for similar reasons. Otherwise, the slogan "might makes right" is pretty literally the argument.

And that's bad for human rights. Back to Waters, my point is that the attacks on him of Anti-Semitism seem to be the common wrong attacks of that for criticizing Israel's crimes, but that I think there are other areas to disagree with him on. Having said that, I haven't seen one post of someone watching the video the thread is about, that is important to understanding the issue of his comments.
 
Back
Top Bottom