• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What do you see in this picture?

What do you see in the following two pictures?

  • a) pointed nose cone

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • b) a blurr

    Votes: 14 77.8%

  • c) Elvis

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • Total voters
    18

Trajan Octavian Titus

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
20,915
Reaction score
546
Location
We can't stop here this is bat country!
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
I have been accused by Scott of "prison planet looks objective" fame of being a government agent because I said I see a blurr in the following pictures:





So my question is do you see a blurr or a pointed nose cone proving that a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon? Personally I see bigfoot and the lockness monster ****ing like wilda beasts, but that's just me.
 
You can't see ANYTHING in that picture, hence, my vote is Elvis :rock
 
looks like a blur to me. Looks like a double exposure.
 
Are you all blind? That is obviously the King.
 
At first I thought it was a blur...then I put on my glasses and knew for sure it was a blur.
 
I only see a blur.
 
I see a Borg transporter mishap.
 
I see the second gunman on the grassy knoll.
 


speaking of pictures, here's one that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Paul is dead and was replaced by a Paul lookalike. See how the rose Paul is wearing is black and the rest are red? Well, in this image you can hardly tell they are red, but believe me, red they be. Taken along with all the other clues they left (paul as the walrus, paul being barefoot, "I buried Paul" backwards lyrics,etc) I really cannot comprehend how anybody else accepts that obvious forgery as being the real Pau!

Would the real Paul write a song as cr@ppy as "Band on the Run"?

I don't think so.
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
When did you get off the conspiracy theories? Can it be that you've finally reentered reality?
Click to expand...

I never did, I'm just saying what I think that picture looks like. If reality is the state that you reside in, I do not want to ever be there. :2wave: :lol:
 

I'm sorry, I must completely disagree with you, here, Gardener. 'Band on the Run' is one of the best songs Paul ever wrote, proving that he's not dead...unless his replacement was a better songwriter.
 
_______
Well, I can see the cement pads and I wish I got had the contract to do it.
My guess? Probably hundreds of thousands of $$$ to do it.
 
I see mofo's that need to get their head out of their a$$ and accept reality for a change.............:roll:

Beyond that I see Sylvester chasing tweety with a candlestick or maybe its foghorn leghorn. Its hard to tell.
 
My memory may be faulty, but didn't the same prison planet article show a graphic comparison in the size between what you see in these pictures vs. what you'd see if it were a 757, based on the height of the airplane against the height of the pentagon? If it wasn't a prison planet article, I'll see if I can dig it up, but it was one of the things that convinced me that maybe an airplane didn't hit the pentagon (I'm still on the fence about it, though).
 
I have no idea what I see. I would probably need the original negatives (or if it's digital, the original files), and some expert photo enhancing techs using top-of the line equipment to tell if it's a freaking blur.
 
The Mark said:
I have no idea what I see. I would probably need the original negatives (or if it's digital, the original files), and some expert photo enhancing techs using top-of the line equipment to tell if it's a freaking blur.
Click to expand...

CSI would be able to tell. Let's get them on the job.
 
I see an event that led to a political ****-storm, caused $500,000,000,000 to shift hands, and eroded the credibility of anyone questioning the official accounting of events. Not only do my eyes see nothing but a blur in that picture, my head tells me that looking at that picture long enough to see anything more than a blur could not possibly be good for my physical, mental, emotional, political, social, or economic health.

Even though there is no conclusive evidence that gods exist, wrapping yourself in metal, climbing a mountain during a thunderstorm, and shouting “All gods are bastards,” is not a smart thing to do. You may be right, but even if you don’t get hit by lightning, nobody who matters will hear you because they all know better than to stand out in the rain.
 

lmfao, fuc.k the gods, fuc.k Zeus and the Christian/Judean/Islamic god, I bow to no man or god because I am a son of hades, I am a god.
 
My sources inform me...

Santa went on a bender, got the months confused, decided the military needed some medals.

Just before impact he was heard shouting..."ho, ho, ho".

Al Sharpton is calling for Santa to be fired.

Hey Imus, looks like you gonna have a daytime drinking buddy.
 
Re: My sources inform me...

teacher said:
Just before impact he was heard shouting..."ho, ho, ho".

Al Sharpton is calling for Santa to be fired.

.
Click to expand...

Are you sure it's not Sharpton who's calling for all the hos?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…