- Joined
- Jan 7, 2013
- Messages
- 8,762
- Reaction score
- 5,360
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Perhaps you are describing what you want or believe the average right winger believes. This thread is about the far right and virtually every attribute mentioned is dead on accurate as to the far right.This pseudopsychology is quite laughable. It's clearly just a politically biased person spouting non-sense.
Right wingers tend to be high in industriousness and low in openness, according to the Big Five of psychology. They value tradition and stability, which means they don't like radical changes. Change must be gradual. They tend to be hard working and focused on building structures (social, community) that are enduring.
Perhaps you are describing what you want or believe the average right winger believes. This thread is about the far right and virtually every attribute mentioned is dead on accurate as to the far right.
BTW- the current "right" does not want change, gradual or otherwise. Unless by change, you mean regression. Then yes, they are for radical change.
Theres a difference between "right" and "far right"This pseudopsychology is quite laughable. It's clearly just a politically biased person spouting non-sense.
Right wingers tend to be high in industriousness and low in openness, according to the Big Five of psychology. They value tradition and stability, which means they don't like radical changes. Change must be gradual. They tend to be hard working and focused on building structures (social, community) that are enduring.
Im on the right. None of that applies to me or anyone I know. The farther right you go in American politics, the smaller the government and the greater the individual. Whoever put this together for you doesnt know wtf they are talking about.What are the psychological characteristics of people holding far-right beliefs?
(no kidding)
https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english...tics-of-people-holding-far-right-beliefs.html
Snippets:
(SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT)
(EXPLAINS TRUMPISM)
(This one I tend to believe is not necessarily an exclusive far right phenomenon, we ALL tend to gravitate towards groups of "like-minded people.") Don't we?
Wasn't for me, was for anyone interested in learning about the human condition, particularly learning about the motivations of the far right. Though it was me who found this gem. I kinda had a sneaking suspicion too, when I read it, and decided to post it, that "some" folks on here would see themselves reflected and react accordingly. Glad I wasn't mistaken.Whoever put this together for you
Correct. Socialism doesnt produce wealth it redistributes it. Without a few capitalists around, it has nothing to loot.Socialism or communism only works with a boost from capitalism.
See China for a good example.
It doesnt reflect me even in the slightest though. So much for your dopey theory.Wasn't for me, was for anyone interested in learning about the human condition, particularly learning about the motivations of the far right. Though it was me who found this gem. I kinda had a sneaking suspicion too, when I read it, and decided to post it, that "some" folks on here would see themselves reflected and react accordingly. Glad I wasn't mistaken.
Theres a difference between "right" and "far right"
What are the psychological characteristics of people holding far-right beliefs?
Right and most of the comments on the first page were about the increased neuroticism and need for control as shown by those elements.I addressed both if you read more carefully, especially my second post.
Right and most of the comments on the first page were about the increased neuroticism and need for control as shown by those elements.
Right now the far right is a big threat to the country, so it makes sense there is concern.I know, but it was veering into talking about the right wing in general which is why I inserted general info about right wing psychology.
This is getting too meta, when it was only one page ago that this happened. Let's just move on.
I would imagine far right and far left extremists shape similar psychological characteristics though that is not my expertiseWhat are the psychological characteristics of people holding far-right beliefs?
(no kidding)
https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english...tics-of-people-holding-far-right-beliefs.html
Snippets:
(SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT)
(EXPLAINS TRUMPISM)
(This one I tend to believe is not necessarily an exclusive far right phenomenon, we ALL tend to gravitate towards groups of "like-minded people.") Don't we?
Right now the far right is a big threat to the country, so it makes sense there is concern.
Higher institutions means little, as I see it.I would say that both the far right and the far left are a concern, but the left more so because of its involvement in higher institutions. (I am not a right winger.)
On the whole, I would say extremism in general is a big problem. Here in Canada it's also a problem.
Higher institutions means little, as I see it.
Hmm. Social soft science is riddled with nonsense. And it's vastly dominated with liberals. Gee I wonder why we get stuff life this from them.What are the psychological characteristics of people holding far-right beliefs?
(no kidding)
https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english...tics-of-people-holding-far-right-beliefs.html
Snippets:
(SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT)
(EXPLAINS TRUMPISM)
(This one I tend to believe is not necessarily an exclusive far right phenomenon, we ALL tend to gravitate towards groups of "like-minded people.") Don't we?
Whatdo they call them up north?It's indicative in many grown southern men, even in their 40s and 50s, still calling their fathers "daddy". This is something I've seen having relatives in the south. There is an issue there, that predisposes them to be drawn to a cult/family-like atmosphere with an older male leader.
I know there has been rural unrest in places like Michigan and some other "northern" states, but I don't think that is the same issue. That may be more concerning, and less revealing, because it may lack that southern "daddy" revering element. Extremists in both, though, seem to be somewhat more driven by hate, not just disagreement.
The issue is violent activity, there is little of that among college professors. The worst you’re going to get there is some identity stuff, which while it’s something I see as somewhat silly (I subscribe to the old notion of just treating people with respect unless they prove otherwise), it’s ultimately harmless.Why?
I know I know, the truth hurts.Hmm. Social soft science is riddled with nonsense. And it's vastly dominated with liberals. Gee I wonder why we get stuff life this from them.
You will get over it.I know I know, the truth hurts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?