Then when the republicans do it to you, you will be cool with it. Did you notice Beto is gone with a bit of dox’ing, and Buttigeg is now the MSM’s darling, and Bernie is being shielded from bad press because he can’t win against the democrat swamp. The Republicans have picked Joe Biden for you because he is up to his ass in Ukraine (thanks Manafort), and up to his ass in shady Chinese deals. And you are being manipulated to ignore it.
The surveillance state screws everyone. (Print the above and see how accurate I am after the DNC convention).
The republican’s deep state is managing your campaign using analytics and planting phony stories.
You said:
I replied, "Ethics and integrity"
That would fall under obstruction of justice. The answer is likely in the report. How will any of us - including Congress - know unless it isn't redacted?
It was clear when he refused to answer the question on whether the white house had seen the Mueller report. Are there any honorable Republicans today?
Of course you criticized The Tarmac Meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch as unethical, right? I'm sure there's a list as long as my arm where you criticized the ethics of your own party..... :roll:
It was clear when he refused to answer the question on whether the white house had seen the Mueller report. Are there any honorable Republicans today?
Of course you criticized The Tarmac Meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch as unethical, right? I'm sure there's a list as long as my arm where you criticized the ethics of your own party..... :roll:
Because Bill Clinton is no longer President, he is not a part of the US government. His wife is under investigation and Loretta Lynch is the AG. Yes, it is improper. The two things are not even close in circumstances.
The investigation is over. What did Trump control while Mueller’s team was doing its work?
Of course, when it was first discussed that Barr had briefed the White House, republicans denied it. And why? No reason; just to kill time.
You said:
I replied, "Ethics and integrity"
So you're saying that Barr discussing the report with the White House was unethical.
Wanna have fun? Ask a trump supporter why the Tarmac meeting was a problem. Yes, you and I know why it was a problem, but see if you can get them to explain why it was a problem.
I asked a few of them but they are oddly silent.
I also asked what pages in the report give all that evidence the insisted was forthcoming in the Mueller report about all of those terrible Americans, like Comey and McCabe and Obama and Clinton and everyone else. I'm not getting that either.
I am watching them jerk each other off, but that's just a little vacation from their usual activities of jerking themselves off while thinking about Donald Trump.
They didn't answer because they don't know. They know that it's scandal-y, but they're not able to say why.
So you're saying that Barr discussing the report with the White House was unethical.
No, that is not what it is like. Mueller doesn't need anyone else there because Barr is not trying to pull anything.Peter Carr, who is Robert Mueller's spokesperson, just put out a statement ahead of tomorrow's press conference that Barr and Rosenstein are giving, that there will be no member of Mueller's team in attendance. Peter Carr will be there only because he handles the press on DOJ criminal matters.
Do you know what that means? It's like having a wedding and only the groom shows up, not the bride. Basically the Mueller team is not in agreement with what William Barr is trying to pull off.
:lamo Nonsense.Here's my take. William Barr, in his 4 page summary, had used only partial sentences out of the actual sentences by Mueller in the original report. In other words, he essentially cherry-picked and sanitized the results of the report which made them favorable for Trump of course.
You seem to forgot that the President was informed that he was not a criminal target, so there is nothing wrong with him being informed after the fact.The difference here is his boss is the subject of the investigation Barr is reporting to him about.
It's unusual for a president to be a suspect, so it is reasonable to question whether Barr's actions are appropriate.
Only those with TDS would think that is a reason to doubt his integrity.If you had doubts about Barr's integrity:
I'm afraid there Republicans as we knew them are gone. Most of what we have now are Banana Republicans.
Controlling the narrative?Imagine the prospect of trying to control the narrative long term when some of the people who don't like Chump and the Trumpanzees already have access to the full unredacted Mueller Report.
Barr, Chump and the other Trumpanzees collectively tasked with the mission to control the narrative face a very, very slippery slope! Tomorrow's unveiling only adds to the drama!
Viva the Anti-Trump Movement! Paranoia has struck deep inside the White House staff!
A Redacted cover up...That is what that fat toad Barr is about to present
Wrong.The only fair thing to do is just release the whole damn thing to everyone on the same day ( and release the unredacted version to the the appropriate committees in congress and the senate ) and let the proverbial chips fall where they may.
That is the right thing to do, but, no way is Barr going to do that.
Control an investigation about him?Even a moron knows that the President cannot control an investigation of himself which is what Trump is attempting.
Only those with TDS would think that is a reason to doubt his integrity. ...
Controlling the narrative?
iLOL...
Wrong as usual.
Did Mueller charge the President with a crime?
Did Mueller come forward and say Barr's summery of his conclusions were wrong? ...
Wrong.
He has requirements he must follow. ...
Control an investigation about him?
iLOL Wrong.
That is not what is happening.
The investigation is over and Mueller clearly did not find or charge any collusion/conspiracy with the Russians to influence the election.
Nor did he decide that the President would be charged with obstruction which is very hard to do when there is no underlying crime in which to obstruct an investigation.
It wasn't an investigation of himself, nor did it turn into one as there was no collusion/conspiracy between the President and Russia to win the election.
Apparently not.I know, I know, [...]
Apparently not.
Huh? You don't agree with Kellyanne Conway?
So you again establish that you do not know. :shrug:
Well if you think I didn't know about a party, I thought about driving over to Mara Lago later today!
What's the difference between a chicken? Both feet are each the same.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?