As I said. There isnt any.
Seems you can't read.
Here is my response again.
"You were refering to the whole post. So no.
If you were refering to just one sentence, it would make sense to quote just that sentence."
When i include a quote from your post in my post I am not "publishing an edited version" of your post.No, your confusion in thinking that when you post an edited version of my post, you haven't posted an edited version of my post.
When i include a quote from your post in my post I am not "publishing an edited version" of your post.
Because earlier you were insisting I was "publishing" things.You can call it "posting" an edited version of my post, if larger words also confuse you.
In fact, I referred to posting and you responded with "publishing".
Because earlier you were insisting I was "publishing" things.
That was funny.
I suppose it's good you stopped with that line of BS.
No its not.No, publishing is synonymous with posting in this context.
I quoted from your post in mineHave you stopped claiming that you haven't posted edited versions of my posts?
No its not.
i gave you the definition days ago.
I quoted from your post in mine
PublishYes. Did I thank you? You can post it again if you like, and we can again see that publishing fits the definition of posting here.
No, I quoted a portion of your post in mine. Because that is the part I was refering to.Yes, you posted an edited version of my post.
Publish
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages ·
verb
prepare and issue (a book, journal, piece of music, etc.) for public sale, distribution, or readership.
Posting here is not publishing. I think you finally realized that, which is why you stopped misusing the term.
No, I quoted a portion of your post in mine. Because that is the part I was refering to.
It doesn't fit.Tell us why it is not publishing, given it fits the definition?
No, not really.Fits this definition too:
Definition of PUBLISH
to make generally known; to make public announcement of; to disseminate to the public… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
I only quoted the parts I was refering to.What happened to the rest of my post? The version you published in your post, wasn't the same as the original.
It doesn't fit.
No, not really.
I only quoted the parts I was refering to.
You are very confused.
I didn't quote the whole post. I chose, for charity's sake, to quote just the parts I was referring to.When you clicked "reply", my entire post wasn't copied into the quote box?
I didn't quote the whole post. I chose, for charity's sake, to quote just the parts I was referring to.
I can explain it as many times as you can lie about it.
Of course I am.You aren't explaining anything.
And then you choose which parts to quote.When I click reply, it copies the entire post- word for word- into a quotagain.
Of course I am.
Read it again.
And then you choose which parts to quote.
Thats what it's for. Quoting. All or part.Well YOU do, for sure. Lol
Nope.Another admission you edit my posts so as to publish a different version
Thats what it's for. Quoting. All or part.
Nope.
I quoted part of your post in my post.
your post remains unedited
Thats what it's for. Quoting. All or part.
Nope.
I quoted part of your post in my post.
your post remains unedited
Because i only quoted the parts of your post i was referring to.Why did only partial version of my post end up in your post? Because you edited it.
Because i only quoted the parts of your post i was referring to.
This isnt rocket science.
Amazing how you can't figure it out.
I quoted a couple of lines from your post.Yes, you posted an edited version of my post. Edited by you. I think virtually everyone has figured that out, and I think you know it is true. However, you weren't worried about your credibility when you told incredulous stories about shotguns, wooden decks and snakes...and you aren't worried about it now. Because trolling and baiting is the whole point with you. Lying is just part of that.
I quoted a couple of lines from your post.
Yes, and it allows you to choose which parts you want to quote.When you clicked the reply button, did it reproduce my entire original post?
Yes, and it allows you to choose which parts you want to quote.
I did not edit your post, it's still there unedited. I dont have the ability to edit your post.
Its f' ing amazing how badly that confuses you.
Because you keep making the ridiculous claim that quoting part of your post is publishing an edited version of your post, rather then simply quoting from itmIt's amazing how often you claim that my original post still being there has some relevance.
I posted quotes.I'm talking about the edited version you published in your post.
It shows that I quoted parts of your post but not the whole thing.Of course my original is "still there". A comparison between that and the version you published makes your edits clear.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?