• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Well, It took all of about five minutes!!


I didn't say that briefing the President on the dossier was a terrible thing to do. I was only pointing out that, contrary to your statement..."That information was not available early in 2017"...that information WAS available, even as early as Oct. 2016, and that Comey knew that information.
 
Comey knew that Clinton and the DNC hired Steele way back in Oct. 2016. That's when the FBI was using the dossier for their FISA application on Page.

Political opposition hires a foreign national with contacts in Russian intelligence for dirt on a presidential campaign, through an intermediary.

DOJ / FBI leadership use materials from that source for a FISA warrant to surveil members of the opposing political campaign.

Fair to say its questionable judgment that DOJ / FBI leadership used those materials for the FISA court warrant, considering its source, clearly given its political beginnings and its political contents.

And at the same time some are saying that Obama's DOJ / FBI leadership aren't rank political hacks? As already demonstrated in their handling of the Hillary email scandal?

:lamo
 
Last edited:

You haven't been following my conversation with others, have you? Look, I don't care if you are up to speed or not. That's your problem and it's easily remedied...read the thread. Then you'll understand why getting the facts straight is significant.

As to the rest..."respected investigator", "taint", "the findings"...all that has nothing to do with anything I've been saying. It's irrelevant...and dismissed.
 

In posts #20 and #21 you make much of the fact that Steele was hired after Clinton campaign hired fusion. Read your own posts to get up to speed. You can dismiss whatever you'd like in an attempt to make it look as if you have a point.
 

FFS. GPS Fusion did not employ Steele until after the contract with Perkins Coie. You are peddling complete disinformation.
 
So the dossier existed before Steele was hired, right? Fusion GPS had the file, had been working on it before they hired Steele.

No. They didn't. The dossier was Steele and only Steele's work product. You are parroting a long debunked narrative. Check the link a few posts up.
 

That is the whole idea behind this mess. To confuse the already dazed about our most important safeguard...the rule of law. This another Trump "hail mary pass" and Rudy is in the end zone. The circus is in town tonight. :lol:
 
No. They didn't. The dossier was Steele and only Steele's work product. You are parroting a long debunked narrative. Check the link a few posts up.

And don't forget that Steele could be the most qualified person alive to handle such an investigation. His credentials are impeccable and would never risk losing them for one job for Fusion.
 

James Comey says he's 'totally fine' with the public reading his Trump memos


+1 2 Comey.
 
In posts #20 and #21 you make much of the fact that Steele was hired after Clinton campaign hired fusion. Read your own posts to get up to speed. You can dismiss whatever you'd like in an attempt to make it look as if you have a point.

Do you know WHY I am saying this?
 

The people have a right to know. Making them public was the whole reason Congress wanted the memos. They never made any bones about that.

This is their job: representing the people.
 

Wow. This is the best, most precise, and most succinct summation of this entire thing that I've seen on here or elsewhere. You nailed it squarely on the head.

Comey isn't a partisan. He's arrogant, and he believed he was the FBI, and all he wanted to do was protect the FBI.
 
And don't forget that Steele could be the most qualified person alive to handle such an investigation. His credentials are impeccable and would never risk losing them for one job for Fusion.

You don't seem to get it. Foreign nationals are prohibited from interfering in US elections. You want collusion, that is straight up collusion. He paid Russians for opposition research on Donald Trump and then shopped it to media and the FBI. Who then used that unverified info for surveillance on the opposition party. How can none of that stink to hell to you?
 

Different conditioning.

Both side salivates when their bells are rung.

The most comprehensively manipulated society in history.
 
Mueller doen't need points. He's a functionary. Your beef is with the A-G's office.

Mueller is quite partisan to Comey. As we can see, Comey hates Trump. Mueller was turned down as director of the FBI to replace Comey just before being appointed to head the independent council. Think there are a WHOLE lot of conflicts of interest, here, bub.
 
Different conditioning.

Both side salivates when their bells are rung.

The most comprehensively manipulated society in history.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Trump is a saint and he picked some skeevy bastards like Manafort and Gates---I hate lobbyists, but it sure does look like Brennan, Rice, Clapper, McCabe, Comey, Page, Powers, Strozk all played parts in this debacle, some probably unaware of what the others were doing, just following partisan instincts to slam the other side and took it entirely too far. Possibly into illegal territory as McCabe is learning.
 

That and his complete trust in McCabe...and his willingness to have complete trust in the dossier. I wonder if his wife and children wanting Hillary as the first woman president colored his investigation?:lol:
 

Yes. The Steele dossier was the one actual example of collusion with foreigners in the lead up to the 2016...that has been verified.
 
Last edited:
Different conditioning.

Both side salivates when their bells are rung.

The most comprehensively manipulated society in history.

Your argument is it's OK because both sides do it? First, when has that axiom ever been proper and secondly, when did the other side 'commit' collusion?
 

But it's not true. The Washington Free Beacon stopped funding Fusion GPS after it became apparent Trump would win the primaries. The DNC/Clinton campaign picked up funding, it was then Fusion GPS hired Steele to investigate the public knowledge of Trumps Russian business connections. All of this has been publicly stated by countless publications left and right.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…