Of course integrity does. But integrity is far more than whether or not someone has sent naked pictures of themselves.
First of all, as I've mentioned, you don't know what his relationship with his wife is like. But, even if we assume it's the traditional relationship, it still has nothing to do with his job. If a man rode a motorcycle without a helmet in his free time, would you say he's unfit for public service because of his reckless disregard for safety? If a man moved to a new house and broke his rental release to do so, would you say he's unfit to hold public office because he's not a man of his word?
Simply focusing in on one aspect of a person, especially an aspect unrelated to his job, to determine if he's qualified for a job is silly. I'm not saying Weiner is qualified or that I'd vote for him, I'm simply saying that sending pictures of his genitals to people would not keep me from voting for him.
It amazes me how persistent you are on being wrong. I'm not even going to bother to read the rest of your post, because I know I can ask one simple question you're incapable of answering in any way but one, the one way which proves my point.
Was this "scandal" about his personal life or was it job related? Until you can tell me it was job related, I don't need to read anything else from you.
I had a girlfriend once who would have been perfectly okay with it. In fact, she would have enjoyed the three of us getting together in person. I'm not really that kind of person, but she wouldn't have had a problem at all with it.
So how does that relate to your question?
No, he acted foolishly, but his actions were reflective of decisions made in his personal life, not his professional. I would not be voting for him to be Minister of Morality, I would be electing him to run my city.
There are many things I would not want my hypothetical children to do...one such thing would be to judge a man totally by his actions in one narrow aspect. I prefer my children be able to see beyond such a limited understanding of the world and realize people are multi-faceted and complex beings, and inefficiencies in one area do not automatically indicate inefficiencies in others.
To directly answer your question, no I would not, but at the same time, his penis has nothing to do with how well he might do his job.
No I would not
He is a person who can not control himself, and as a mayor a person should be able to control their actions, especially impulsive ones that probably are not going to be good.
And cannot be determined simply upon sexual preferences.Integrity is foundational to character
Why? Because he shows his penis to women? What happens between him and his wife is between them, it has nothing to do with his job. If a doctor cheats on his wife (as they tend to do), does that mean he should no longer be a doctor?and a guy with weiner's problems shouldn't hold a position of trust
Do you have a job based reason not to trust? If you do, that's different. If you don't, then I don't see what cyber sexing has to do with being mayor.trust being foundational to an elected position.
Wow...he's a sexual predator? Quite the leap you're making there.You want a sexual predator holding the most powerful mayorship in the nation?
No, I speak for me, and you are challenging my opinion. So, once more, you seem to have no idea what you are talking about.My question would be a moot point if you speak for everyone. Do You?
I'm literally dumbfounded how anyone could take this opinion seriously.Carlos's penis has been seen all over the world as has his lewd conversation with a 22 year-old. The condition of his penis has everything to do with how well he might do his job. If he should become over-stimulated while speaking in public because he sees a sexual 20 year-old, some in the audience may not understand the throbbing bulge before them no matter how multi-faceted and complex he may be.
Of course integrity does. But integrity is far more than whether or not someone has sent naked pictures of themselves.
First of all, as I've mentioned, you don't know what his relationship with his wife is like. But, even if we assume it's the traditional relationship, it still has nothing to do with his job.
Simply focusing in on one aspect of a person, especially an aspect unrelated to his job, to determine if he's qualified for a job is silly. I'm not saying Weiner is qualified or that I'd vote for him, I'm simply saying that sending pictures of his genitals to people would not keep me from voting for him.
And cannot be determined simply upon sexual preferences.
Why? Because he shows his penis to women? What happens between him and his wife is between them, it has nothing to do with his job. If a doctor cheats on his wife (as they tend to do), does that mean he should no longer be a doctor?
Do you have a job based reason not to trust? If you do, that's different. If you don't, then I don't see what cyber sexing has to do with being mayor.
Wow...he's a sexual predator? Quite the leap you're making there.
No, I speak for me, and you are challenging my opinion. So, once more, you seem to have no idea what you are talking about.
I'm literally dumbfounded how anyone could take this opinion seriously.
As I've said 21835923759823 different times in this thread, what happens between he and his wife is between he and his wife.Is it? Do marital vows mean anything to you?
Disagree completely. His sexual habits have nothing to do with his job performance. You cannot find me a single piece of evidence which links sex preference to job performance. Is it possible the type of person who cheats on his wife would lie about other things? Absolutely. But until we have the evidence that he has, you cannot hold his public life hostage to his private life.Sure I do. Huma isn't "enough" for him. Neither is the desire for a good reputation nor the respect of voters. And it has everything to do with his job: If a person can't honor and respect his life-partner and the mother of his only child, he surely isn't able to respect his would-be constituents. Character isn't a quality that can be compartmentalized. But I do think that it begins at home.
Then you don't seem to care about job performance, rather dictating morality.This is an issue that would definitely keep me from voting for him.
I was being incredibly respectful considering what I truly wanted to say about your asinine post.You need to learn to allow others to express their opinions without being disrespectful.
As I've said 21835923759823 different times in this thread, what happens between he and his wife is between he and his wife.
Disagree completely. His sexual habits have nothing to do with his job performance. You cannot find me a single piece of evidence which links sex preference to job performance. Is it possible the type of person who cheats on his wife would lie about other things? Absolutely. But until we have the evidence that he has, you cannot hold his public life hostage to his private life.
Then you don't seem to care about job performance, rather dictating morality.
I was being incredibly respectful considering what I truly wanted to say about your asinine post.
No, I'm flummoxed as to how a description of his penis has anything to do with anything.You seem to be flummoxed that anyone would dare challenge your opinion, but you'll discover that we all are uniquely different.
No, I'm flummoxed as to how a description of his penis has anything to do with anything.
Or not stupid enough to think the way a man's penis looks has anything to do with his ability to do his job.For a man you are extremely naïve or extremely pertinacious.
Or not stupid enough to think the way a man's penis looks has anything to do with his ability to do his job.
I'm not the one saying the way his penis looks has anything to do with anything.It's not about his penis; it's about his character.
Or not stupid enough to think the way a man's penis looks has anything to do with his ability to do his job.
And cannot be determined simply upon sexual preferences.
On the contrary, I'm sure John Bobbitt would agree his wife's actions doesn't mean he cannot do his job.John Bobbitt might disagree with you, but that's off topic.
Understood. And what I'm saying is that his penis in the public eye doesn't change how well he does his job.Just my opinion, but I think a man or a woman who is in the public eye should keep their genitalia out of the public's eyes.
No one is. Not a single person has replied to me with something unrelated to what happened with this sex "scandal". You haven't mentioned the job he did as a Congressman, you haven't noted any lies he may have told, you haven't brought up his records, etc.Which is why we are discussing things beyond sexual preference ...
No one is.
Not a single person has replied to me with something unrelated to what happened with this sex "scandal".
You haven't mentioned the job he did as a Congressman, you haven't noted any lies he may have told, you haven't brought up his records, etc.
No, the only thing anyone has replied to me with (and I haven't read any other responses except the one to me, so I don't know if others have mentioned it elsewhere or not) has been directly related to exposing his penis in public.
On the contrary, I'm sure John Bobbitt would agree his wife's actions doesn't mean he cannot do his job.
Understood. And what I'm saying is that his penis in the public eye doesn't change how well he does his job.
No one is. Not a single person has replied to me with something unrelated to what happened with this sex "scandal". You haven't mentioned the job he did as a Congressman, you haven't noted any lies he may have told, you haven't brought up his records, etc.
No, the only thing anyone has replied to me with (and I haven't read any other responses except the one to me, so I don't know if others have mentioned it elsewhere or not) has been directly related to exposing his penis in public.
Would you want Anthony Weiner as mayor of your city? Do you think he would do a good job as mayor? If so, what kinds of things do you think he would do to better your city?
And cannot be determined simply upon sexual preferences.
Why? Because he shows his penis to women? What happens between him and his wife is between them, it has nothing to do with his job. If a doctor cheats on his wife (as they tend to do), does that mean he should no longer be a doctor?
Do you have a job based reason not to trust? If you do, that's different. If you don't, then I don't see what cyber sexing has to do with being mayor.
Wow...he's a sexual predator? Quite the leap you're making there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?