• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

We defeated the wrong enemy - General George S. Patton . read We d take bandit Koba down first

Litwin

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
33,607
Reaction score
5,193
Location
GDL/Sweden
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
We defeated the wrong enemy - General George S. Patton . read We´d take commie bandit Koba down first

i have 2 questions
1) how General George S. Patton came to this conclusion ?
2) and why USA/UK did not liberate Eastern Europe from Stalinist , totalitarian, commie, satanic occupation in 1945? even thought the West ( centralization ) had such plans

"Operation Unthinkable were two related but unrealised plans by the Western Allies against the totalitarian Soviet Union. They were ordered by British prime minister Winston Churchill in 1945 and developed by the British Armed Forces' Joint Planning ... and the perception that the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin (koba) was unreliable, there ... "
 

We’ve already been over this bud.....Unthinkable was simply not workable. The vast majority of people in the west were sick of war by 1945. They were not going to turn around and start another world war right after finishing the last one. They wanted to move on with their lives.

As for Patton.....he was the kind of guy who always hoped to die with the last bullet in the last battle of the last war.

From your own source: “The plan was taken by the British Chiefs of Staff Committee as militarily unfeasible due to an anticipated 2.5 to 1 superiority in divisions of Soviet land forces in Europe and the Middle East by 1 July, where the conflict was projected to take place.[5] The majority of any offensive operation would have been undertaken by American and British forces, as well as Polish forces and up to 10 divisions of the former German Wehrmacht, re-mobilized from POW status. Any quick success would be due to surprise alone. If a quick success could not be obtained before the onset of winter, the assessment was that the Allies would be committed to a protracted total war. ”
 
You simply do not beat Russia in a conventional fight. There is a reason it was called "Operation Unthinkable" and one of Adolf Hitler's foremost military blunders was opening a front against the USSR while simultaneously fighting the West...
 

You have an unhealthy obsession with killing Soviets.
 
maxparrish said:
Among obsessions, it is one of the healthiest.
Click to expand...

One look at those unhinged rants about “mongols” and “anti christ asians” and whatever else he decides to spew pretty clearly shows otherwise.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Sure man. Gotta kill those satanic mongol asiastic muscovites Bolshevik ruskie soviets
Click to expand...

And, I might add, those who didn't have those feelings were fellow traveling, pinko, traitors. The Rosenberg's were only first of what should have been many executions of this scum.
 
maxparrish said:
And, I might add, those who didn't have those feelings were fellow traveling, pinko, traitors. The Rosenberg's were only first of what should have been many executions of this scum.
Click to expand...

Whoa, careful there buddy!

You might cut yourself on that edge.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
You have an unhealthy obsession with killing Soviets.
Click to expand...

Soviets? brutal occupants yes, am i wrong`what ´d you do, if you ´d be enslaved and your home ´d be taking by Asiatic satanic herders ?
 
maxparrish said:
And, I might add, those who didn't have those feelings were fellow traveling, pinko, traitors. The Rosenberg's were only first of what should have been many executions of this scum.
Click to expand...

100% agreed. Washington elites were badly infected by commie spies, commies and koba´s useful idiots
 
If we didn't have the Cold War and the space race, I would not have drank myself sick on Tang as a kid.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Whoa, careful there buddy!

You might cut yourself on that edge.
Click to expand...

There isn't a double edge blade. From the 1930s into the 1950s (and sometimes longer) America was infested with an intelligentsia and a arts culture of communist stooges and fellow travelers to international communism, supporters of Lenin and then Stalinist methods of concentration labor camps and mass killings (as well as the genocide and ethnic cleansing of many peoples in the Soviet Empire). Moreover, as agents of the Soviets against the survival of their own countries none of them, on a moral level, deserved a hearing of more than 10 minutes on a hangman's gallows.

Naturally, liberals went into overtime defending this scum, whining about their innocence and unfair treatment - promoting anti-communism as the real threat to America. Fortunately the West survived long enough, in spite of these relentless termites efforts, to see the fall of European and Russian communism.

In any event, there are dozens (perhaps hundreds) that never received the punishment, let alone full punishment, so richly earned.
 

Are you pretending that liberals are sympathetic to communism?
 
maxparrish said:
I'm sure there are some good liberals...somewhere.
Click to expand...

I don't fringin' care about your personal opinion of liberals. I asked you if you think liberals support communism. It's not a hard question. Do you think liberals support communism?
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Sure man. Gotta kill those satanic mongol asiastic muscovites Bolshevik ruskie soviets
Click to expand...

It's as the muslims were saying back during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, "killing a communist is equal to praying 80,000 times to Allah"
 
maxparrish said:
And, I might add, those who didn't have those feelings were fellow traveling, pinko, traitors. The Rosenberg's were only first of what should have been many executions of this scum.
Click to expand...

Alger Hiss definitely deserved a rope.
 
Grand Mal said:
Are you pretending that liberals are sympathetic to communism?
Click to expand...

Depends on what context you're using the word "liberal". If by that you mean the leftistism of the Arts and Academia then not only were they sympathetic, many were outright apologists.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Depends on what context you're using the word "liberal". If by that you mean the leftistism of the Arts and Academia then not only were they sympathetic, many were outright apologists.
Click to expand...

I know what liberal means. I've been liberal all my life, inherited liberal values, and I don't need to be told what anyone else thinks it means. The Oxford English Dictionary or, alternately, Merriam-Websters are available to everyone.
Anyone who is sympathetic to or supportive of communism is no liberal. I don't care what he, you or anyone else says.
 
maxparrish said:
I'm sure there are some good liberals...somewhere.
Click to expand...

I’m sure conservatives will get over the defeat of their hero Adolf....someday.

After all, there’s just as much proof that conservatives are sympathetic to fascism as there is that liberals are sympathetic to communism.
 
Grand Mal said:
I don't fringin' care about your personal opinion of liberals. I asked you if you think liberals support communism. It's not a hard question. Do you think liberals support communism?
Click to expand...

I thought the meaning in my reply more than sufficiently obvious, even for the low-end of average persons. However, as you need it spelled out for you: NO, I am not pretending liberals are sympathetic to communism. I am assuming that there must be some good liberals, somewhere, that are not so.

Having had a life-time of listening to liberals yammer about "the good things people overlook" in communism, preaching "blame America first" in cold war issues, and defending every barefoot, one-party state "socialist" dictator supported by Moscow as the next coming of Christ for the poor and oppressed, the only difference I have found between liberals and communists is the first is naïve about communism and the second utterly ruthless and realistic about the gullibility of liberals.

Got it?
 
Tigerace117 said:
I’m sure conservatives will get over the defeat of their hero Adolf....someday.

After all, there’s just as much proof that conservatives are sympathetic to fascism as there is that liberals are sympathetic to communism.
Click to expand...

If you were conversant in left-wing, cold war and intellectual history you'd know how foolish that statement is. The "conservative" active sympathy for fascism has been negligible when compared to the well known history of liberal-left fawning in American political journals, American public intellectuals, liberal membership in hundreds of communist fronts, and the celebrity gaga romance over communism. I suggest you read: "The Fellow Travelers" by (liberal) David Caute, and "The Red Decade" by Eugene Lyons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…