Harry Guerrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 28,951
- Reaction score
- 12,422
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It's more of a business proposition, he is working out plans with the government to acquire a hot spring to make thermo-eletrical facility.
Water not recognized as human right in forum statement
The U.S. blocked the "right" amendment because it wants water to eventually become a commodity. The U.S. is currently experiencing forseeable water shortages across the board. Under NAFTA, it could legally begin transferring water from the Great Lakes (shared by Canada) to other area of the U.S., even via corporate means, for resale.
Say hello to the future of corporatism.
Now that is slick. I'd like to see that.
Will you get to visit the build if it goes through?
Of course, even if it doesn't go through which is a hassle within itself I am planning on visiting up there.
One cannot live without water.
Seriously think about the question...
There is a drought, relistically only 40% of the local population can quench there thirst. (like in africa with some of thoughs droughts)
If one lives where there is not enough water. How does one exercise thier "right" to water?
I am sure most water isn't even wasted by people drinking it, most water is probably used in toilets, showers, sprinklers and other things that use gallons and gallons of the stuff wastefully. California is probably on average with the whole US with water consumption per household, it is just they have so many households in general and such lack of water, that maybe instead of asking for water in other areas of United States, they should limit even more the use of sprinkler water and how much water can go to each house. Have a water meter, and when you are running dangerously low a person comes to your house to explain to you the importance of conserving your water and ask what you are doing wrong to waste the stuff.
I'd thank you Jerry, But I dispise Glock. :lol:
If one lives where there is not enough water. How does one exercise thier "right" to water?
Too many people equate having a right to x means that they have a right to have x provided to them w/o having to pay for it.But if you want someone to bring water to you so that you have easy access, regardless of where you live, then that is not a right, and water then becomes a commodity.
Too many people equate having a right to x means that they have a right to have x provided to them w/o having to pay for it.
Except when x = guns, of course.
Everyone has a right to have access to air. See what happens if you deny someone their access to air. You get charged with murder.
What is this nonsense?
No no, if my kid and I are out on a boat in the ocean, and I decide that my kid is inconvenient and so kick him off, and he looses his access to air when he goes under water, it's not my fault he drowned.
His relationship to me and my boat was parasitic anyway, and since it's my boat, it's my choice.
Honestly, Tucker, I thought you were Pro-Choice. I guess I was wrong.
Someone the is pregnant cannot hand off the kid to someone else.
Well, if they're pregnant it's not a kid, it's a fetus.
Once the fetus officially becomes a kid, it most certainly can be handed off to someone else, whether by adoption, abandonment or sold into slavery or human trafficking.
So much for your analysis. :doh
Oh I'm sorry I guess I have to go sesame street for you I'm sorry, didn't realize your limited capacity for thought.
Here we go, someone who is born can be passed off easilty whether by adoption or family member. A fetus cannot, so it is not the same.
Is that easier for you to understand or do you need crayon?
So if nobody will take my kid I can kill him. Thanks, I'll keep that in mind
No once your kid is born you can get the state to take him.
They will.
Any other questions Sherlock Homes? LOL
Oh I'm sorry...
do you need crayon?
The difference is your kid is not parasitic as you can give him to someone else.
Someone the is pregnant cannot hand off the kid to someone else.
Your stupid analysis is noted and noted as idiotic as a religious whore.
My bad...
Well you should be, your lines of rational here are Epic Fail.
No you keep 'em, you need to practice stayin' inside the lines.
Really? Well he's consuming my nautical resources against my will, you better come get him because I'm on the bridge checking the radar and I don't see any other vessels.
And they have every right to summarily kick that kid off the boat in the middle of the ocian.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?