• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Watch this Interview and you will want to punch Paul in the face!

Link ARTICLE LINK HERE

He's trying to be the new trump. He's already got strange, fake hair - slimeball
Rand Paul personifies a little wuss with a Big Doofus mouth. Rand's diminutive neighborhor, Dr. Rene Boucher, gave Rand a Beat-down!

Jim Skaggs, who lives nearby (and is also one of the developers of the Rivergreen community), said that he thinks that Boucher charged at Paul from the street. From that direction, Paul's yard slopes steeply downward, toward the lake at the rear of his property. Barreling downward about 30 degrees, this imagined path would increase the force of a running tackle, perhaps explaining how a man of Boucher's diminutive stature—an acquaintance of the two men estimates that they both stand five-foot-six and weigh about 140 pounds—could do so much damage.

 
Link ARTICLE LINK HERE

He's trying to be the new trump. He's already got strange, fake hair - slimeball
I already wanted to punch him in the face. But let's be honest, Rand Paul can't pull a Trump, he couldn't even pull a Ron Paul.

Though I like how Cheeseburger Bridge Christie now tries to sound like the sane one, he wouldn't if Trump was in power and he still had a chance to join the steal Cabinet.
 
Link ARTICLE LINK HERE

He's trying to be the new trump. He's already got strange, fake hair - slimeball

1. He doesn't want to answer the question.

There's not enough evidence to conclude the election was stolen. But he doesn't want to say that and upset his base of morons. So, instead, he talks about laws that were changed and says there should be an investigation.

But remember that Trump claimed there was fraud in 2016 and there was an investigation that found nothing.

2. Whether or not legislatures changed rules legally or not has nothing to do with the type of election fraud that Trump claimed.

Trump said that voting machines flipped votes. Stephanopoulos should have pressed him on blatant lies like whether voting machines flipped votes or whether Dominion Systems was owned by Venezuela. Once you prove that Trump was lying about that then why believe him about anything else.

Moreover, Trump claimed there was fraud before the election when it was clear he was behind in the polls.


But I do agree with Paul that journalists shouldn't insert their opinion in the story. They should get someone from the opposing side to argue the opposite point. They should only ask tough questions.
 
Nope...not at all, but of course trumpanzees have trouble with reading comprehension.

That is exactly what this thread is about.
 
The worst elements of the Republican Party are lining up to see who can take over Trump's mantle as the chief purveyor of lies.
yup
 
Rand Paul personifies a little wuss with a Big Doofus mouth. Rand's diminutive neighborhor, Dr. Rene Boucher, gave Rand a Beat-down!



I remember that! His neighbor pushed him down on a lawn and whimpy Paul broke his little ribs. Paul's nickname should be "Bird Bones"!
 
I already wanted to punch him in the face. But let's be honest, Rand Paul can't pull a Trump, he couldn't even pull a Ron Paul.

Though I like how Cheeseburger Bridge Christie now tries to sound like the sane one, he wouldn't if Trump was in power and he still had a chance to join the steal Cabinet.
Christie is literally a big, fat asshole! I'm so gad he was fed his lunch on Stephanopoulos today!
 
Well...it takes a lot of asshole to get your neighbor to beat your ass.
I'd do it for free, but it would take too long to wash the slime from my hands!
 
i don't want to watch the interview or to punch anyone in the face. i want Republicans voted out.
 
1. He doesn't want to answer the question.

There's not enough evidence to conclude the election was stolen. But he doesn't want to say that and upset his base of morons. So, instead, he talks about laws that were changed and says there should be an investigation.

But remember that Trump claimed there was fraud in 2016 and there was an investigation that found nothing.

2. Whether or not legislatures changed rules legally or not has nothing to do with the type of election fraud that Trump claimed.

Trump said that voting machines flipped votes. Stephanopoulos should have pressed him on blatant lies like whether voting machines flipped votes or whether Dominion Systems was owned by Venezuela. Once you prove that Trump was lying about that then why believe him about anything else.

Moreover, Trump claimed there was fraud before the election when it was I st clear he was behind in the polls


But I do agree with Paul that journalists shouldn't insert their opinion in the story. They should get someone from the opposing side to argue the opposite point. They should only ask tough questions.
To you final paragraph: I disagree with you. Stephanopoulos was correct: there aren't two sides to every story. The election was NOT stolen! George was quite correct for saying so, my friend. That disgusting lie needs to be exposed.
 
I have three things working against me on this. I've taken to avoiding physical violence in my old age. It, at best, never got me much but sore knuckles when I was young. I hate waiting in line and it appears there would be quite a long line before I'd get my turn. And, finally, I wouldn't piss on that bloviating pip-squeek if he was on fire.
 
Back
Top Bottom