- Joined
- Jan 17, 2022
- Messages
- 12,937
- Reaction score
- 12,965
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Sounds bad. Got any evidence to back that up?USAID was being abused for kickback scams.
The Democrats think that they are entitiled to steal.
In effect the greedy corrupt Democrats were stealing from the poor.
I get it....making shit up is how MAGAts have fun. You do you.USAID was being abused for kickback scams.
The Democrats think that they are entitiled to steal.
In effect the greedy corrupt Democrats were stealing from the poor.
Kickbacks - bad!!!!USAID was being abused for kickback scams.
The Democrats think that they are entitiled to steal.
In effect the greedy corrupt Democrats were stealing from the poor.
Washington Post -- Trump And Musk Shutting Down USAID Has Already Caused Nearly 300,000 Deaths Worldwide So Far
Horess**t. The Number comes from a "model" by a Theoretical Health Modeler, who has has said that "the number is a projection, not a direct count, due to the absence of real-time tracking in many affected regions." And, she says, "The biggest uncertainties in all of these estimates are: 1) the extent to which countries and organizations have pivoted to mitigate this disaster (likely highly variable)," she wrote in The Washington Post. "And 2) which programs are actually still funded with funding actually flowing — and which aren’t."the horrific cost to humanity that these two evil ****s Trump and Musk have caused to the world so far. --
USAID was being abused for kickback scams.
The Democrats think that they are entitiled to steal.
In effect the greedy corrupt Democrats were stealing from the poor.
Horess**t. The Number comes from a "model" by a Theoretical Health Modeler, who has has said that "the number is a projection, not a direct count, due to the absence of real-time tracking in many affected regions." And, she says, "The biggest uncertainties in all of these estimates are: 1) the extent to which countries and organizations have pivoted to mitigate this disaster (likely highly variable)," she wrote in The Washington Post. "And 2) which programs are actually still funded with funding actually flowing — and which aren’t."
IOW, it's a guess.
Well that's the dumbest thing I'll read all day.
Apparently, all of us sitting here are 'causing death' around the world by not donating money to people who might live if they had our money.
Not much. How much suffering has there been?How much suffering is acceptable to you?
These people would still be getting the food and supplies if Trump and Musk had not shut down USAID.Well that's the dumbest thing I'll read all day.
Apparently, all of us sitting here are 'causing death' around the world by not donating money to people who might live if they had our money.
So how many people have died as a result of Trump and Musk shutting down USAID?Horess**t. The Number comes from a "model" by a Theoretical Health Modeler, who has has said that "the number is a projection, not a direct count, due to the absence of real-time tracking in many affected regions." And, she says, "The biggest uncertainties in all of these estimates are: 1) the extent to which countries and organizations have pivoted to mitigate this disaster (likely highly variable)," she wrote in The Washington Post. "And 2) which programs are actually still funded with funding actually flowing — and which aren’t."
IOW, it's a guess.
Not much. How much suffering has there been?
I don't know. You don't know. And the Modeler being cited admits that she doesn't know. But here's a question for you: What life-saving programs were stopped?So how many people have died as a result of Trump and Musk shutting down USAID?
Nope. I'm critical of people making sweeping claims of "facts" on the basis of estimates of potentials created by mathematical models. Skepticism on such things is pretty f**king smart.You're obviously more upset about how the estimate was determined than about what Trump and Musk did to USAID. That's pretty ****ing stupid.
In this case the “corruption” is just the shiny object that Republicans always use. They will find a couple of million dollars of questionable spending or perhaps even fraud. Then they run around waving it in everyone’s face and claiming that a 50 billion dollar program needs to be shut down.Is there any reason why they couldn't have simply rooted out the corruption instead of causing such misery to millions of people?
I'd find that unacceptable also, if those children didn't have access to previously distributed oxygen. Do you have a reputable source for the facts of such a situation?I found it unacceptable that Musk's actions resulted in children not being able to get access to life saving oxygen that was sitting undelivered in warehouses.
Now the MAGAs will be wanking for weeks.
I realize that helping other people is anathema to some libertarians but gee it would seem like you would at least recognize cause and effect when you see it.Well that's the dumbest thing I'll read all day.
Apparently, all of us sitting here are 'causing death' around the world by not donating money to people who might live if they had our money.
These people would still be getting the food and supplies if Trump and Musk had not shut down USAID.
Your inability to understand that is your problem.
Democrats?USAID was being abused for kickback scams.
The Democrats think that they are entitiled to steal.
In effect the greedy corrupt Democrats were stealing from the poor.
USAID was using my own money.Yes, and they would also be getting food and supplies if you donated your own money to them. Since you refuse to do so, you are causing people to die, using your own "reasoning".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?