President Trump on Friday warned a ruling striking down most of his tariffs "would literally destroy the United States of America" if it stands.
Other means you give a different choice than the poll choices.Was the Trump administration incompetent or arrogant by not getting a judicial ruling before upsetting U.S. trade relations with the entire world?
No.
Yes and Biden's policy changes were not of the same magnitude.Other - adding a requirement that the POTUS get a “judicial ruling” (prior approval from some judge?) before making policy changes isn’t found in the constitution.
BTW, did you have the same concern over Biden’s immigration or student loan ‘forgiveness’ policy changes?
Yes and Biden's policy changes were not of the same magnitude.
Trump himself say making his tariffs illegal will be a disaster for America.Nonsense.
If donald would of honored his oath of office, he would of abided by the Constitution.Other - adding a requirement that the POTUS get a “judicial ruling” (prior approval from some judge?) before making policy changes isn’t found in the constitution.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:Was the Trump administration incompetent or arrogant by not getting a judicial ruling?
Other - adding a requirement that the POTUS get a “judicial ruling” (prior approval from some judge?) before making policy changes isn’t found in the constitution.
BTW, did you have the same concern over Biden’s immigration or student loan ‘forgiveness’ policy changes?
If donald would of honored his oath of office, he would of abided by the Constitution.
But donald, in his arrogance, believes his lawyers can always find a way to skirt Constitutional law.
Donald is tragically mistaken.
As are every one of his halfwitted sycophants.
President Trump on Friday warned a ruling striking down most of his tariffs "would literally destroy the United States of America" if it stands.
What is (or isn’t) considered (declared?) to be a ‘national emergency’ is a matter of opinion - not something specified by the Constitution or by the IEEPA law.
Don't care.Other means you give a different choice than the poll choices.
Why?incompetent
Read the constitution
a serious, unexpected, and often dangerous situation requiring immediate action.What is (or isn’t) considered (declared?) to be a ‘national emergency’ is a matter of opinion - not something specified by the Constitution or by the IEEPA law.
a serious, unexpected, and often dangerous situation requiring immediate action.
YesWas the Trump administration incompetent or arrogant by not getting a judicial ruling before upsetting U.S. trade relations with the entire world?
No.
How so?
Putting our military boots on the ground in multiple areas, attacking habeas corpus, ending funding already authorized by congress, threatening judges, media companies, individuals, lawyers and law firms who dared to publicly disagree with his agenda. He signed an executive order that seeks to take power over elections.What is (or isn’t) considered (declared?) to be a ‘national emergency’ is a matter of opinion - not something specified by the Constitution or by the IEEPA law.
well, since did not explain your No, why should I explain my Yes?How so?
Putting our military boots on the ground in multiple areas, attacking habeas corpus, ending funding already authorized by congress, threatening judges, media companies, individuals, lawyers and law firms who dared to publicly disagree with his agenda. He signed an executive order that seeks to take power over elections.
These are just a portion of the unconstitutional pushes Donald is attempting.
Congress and his sycophants are all bending the knee for every Constitutional abuse he tries.
9 months ago Donald swore to uphold the Constitution. Clearly, he never intended go do so.
That makes him and everyone who supports him a piece of shite in my book.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?