- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 15,633
- Reaction score
- 6,159
- Location
- Behind the Orange Curtain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Isnt this about the Bush administration?
It's a poll.
Vote and move on.
Giving money to a family who lost their son/daughter/father/mother is not supporting terrorism. But if you consider that terrorism why didnt we invade Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait? Hell after all we supported terrorism... Some say we still do.
We're probably supporting terrorism with all the "aid" we send to those hell holes anyways.
I thought smoking marijuana supported terrorism. :thinking I seen that mess on a commercial.
Yeah because that remotely reflects his foreign policy.
:roll:
What did Pres. Bush lie about?
If anything, I would say he was far and away the most straight forward POTUS in my lifetime.
people in iraq have been killing each other for ten years because of your potus.
Yeah, people have been killing each other in that part of the world since forever. The tribal feuds span generations.
no ,teh politic stability in iraq was destroyed after the invasion and everybody knows this fact.you should read more news about it.no country should feed this tribal killings ?
I think you need to read about the atrocities that Saddam Hussein carried out on his own people. Is THAT what you call "political stability?" :roll:
Human rights in Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
usa isnt responsible for these acrocities.there was no need to cause more violence....................
Yet you agreed with Obama helping the French get rig of Gaddafi.
usa isnt responsible for these acrocities.there was no need to cause more violence............
but junior needed excuses to feed the monster he talked to
l cant agree with any military or political decision made by the other countries.l dont have to.those dictators were created ,fed ,supported by Cia until they become a threat against them.
I think what makes matters worse for bush is that he was sandwiched in between two good presidents with obama and clinton so his failures are magnified. Its like Sam bowie. Hakeem the dream went 1st. Bowie went 2nd and jordan went 3rd. Bowie was drafted after a hall of famer and before the best player in history so he is known as the worst bust in history because of that.
Except neither Clinton nor Obama are good. Bush is in great company on that front. There's relatively no difference between Bush and Obama.
I would suggest in some ways he tries to, but is incompetent to do it as well.That is true. Obama essentially just continued on with much of Bush policy. Our presidents are like puppets.
I would suggest in some ways he tries to, but is incompetent to do it as well.
George Bush had years of experience being a governor and running a state. President Obama had little to no experience, as others have stated. His experience was as a community organizer, so it's not so surprising. I don't think President Obama is a "good" president, but I have to say that I think it could be worse, and he is not as left leaning as some of the people on this forum would even like, and that is why some of them actually disapprove of his job as president. Shocking! :lol:
The blind partisanship of Right wingers is clearly visible when they vote north of 50% supporting the idea that Bush was a good president. Laughable.
even better is the reactionary Bush sucks from Liberals. I judge presidents on several subjects. THe judges they appoint is the most important. In that area, Bush was a good president.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?