• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Walworth County court commissioner says he was forced out after questioning ICE warrant

dcsports

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
25,340
Reaction score
7,926
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative

A court commissioner in Walworth County says he was forced out of his position after he asked to see an immigration arrest warrant from a sheriff's deputy trying to take a man into custody. Peter Navis, the county's circuit court commissioner for the past four years, said he resigned after he was told he could voluntarily leave or be fired over the July 15 incident in his courtroom.
...
In the Walworth County case, Navis said he was told by three of the county's judges that Navis had misstated their position about whether immigration warrants had to be shown before an arrest can be made in court. Judges appoint and can fire commissioners, who exercise similar functions as judges, such as accepting pleas and holding preliminary hearings, in the early stages of a case.

Navis said he was wrong to make a sweeping statement about the judges' stance, but said he stands by his position that deputies should have shown him a warrant before making an arrest. "There is no avoiding this is a larger issue in the country about how these things are handled ... Every state and county in the country probably has to confront this issue," Navis, 45, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in an interview. "The fact that there were no discussions about how this would happen in Walworth County, and that it was happening in my courtroom for the first time, made it stressful."

Navis recalled an emotional scene in his courtroom as he objected to the deputies taking the man into custody without showing a warrant. But Navis said he couldn't prevent it. "They are the deputies," he said, "so it's not like I could physically get down from my bench and stop them from doing it."

I don't think the Sheriff should have forced a confrontation in the courtroom. There should be some measure of respect for the court - and for others in government service. While technically, the judge isn't a party to the federal case, there's not a reason he can't see the warrant, or that he shouldn't have a measure of control over what goes on in his courtroom. They could have made the arrest outside the courtroom.

I also don't think the commissioner should have been fired for this. He was trying to seek policy from his bosses over something they hadn't covered (and should have). He also didn't actually do anything to stop the arrest. He was asking everyone to take a pause and clarify what was the right thing to do. His bosses should have given him a policy and moved on.

This one is being compared by the news source to the Hannah Dougan, but I see them as very different.
 



I don't think the Sheriff should have forced a confrontation in the courtroom. There should be some measure of respect for the court - and for others in government service. While technically, the judge isn't a party to the federal case, there's not a reason he can't see the warrant, or that he shouldn't have a measure of control over what goes on in his courtroom. They could have made the arrest outside the courtroom.

I also don't think the commissioner should have been fired for this. He was trying to seek policy from his bosses over something they hadn't covered (and should have). He also didn't actually do anything to stop the arrest. He was asking everyone to take a pause and clarify what was the right thing to do. His bosses should have given him a policy and moved on.

This one is being compared by the news source to the Hannah Dougan, but I see them as very different.
The commissioner is not a judge - he works for the judges. Apparently they told him he can either resign or be fired for misrepresenting their position and causing a rukus.
 
ICE arresting individuals in a courtroom is extremely problematic.

This is disgusting.....


 
The commissioner is not a judge - he works for the judges. Apparently they told him he can either resign or be fired for misrepresenting their position and causing a rukus.
I understand what he is and what they did (it's pretty clearly stated in the article). He's effectively a hired judge, rather than an elected one, to take care of minor issues in that county. He has a courtroom and is expected to preside over it.

Again - it doesn't sound like he did anything other than try to pause the issue in his courtroom and get clarification. The Sheriff's deputies probably could have solved the issue by showing him the warrant. And they could have arrested the person as he exited the courtroom and avoid the issue all together. Or they could ignore the judge - which they have to work with - and arrest the person (as they did).

I personally don't think it's right for the 'bosses' to fire him for seeking clarification on something they had not addressed and should have.
 
I understand what he is and what they did (it's pretty clearly stated in the article). He's effectively a hired judge, rather than an elected one, to take care of minor issues in that county. He has a courtroom and is expected to preside over it.

Again - it doesn't sound like he did anything other than try to pause the issue in his courtroom and get clarification. The Sheriff's deputies probably could have solved the issue by showing him the warrant. And they could have arrested the person as he exited the courtroom and avoid the issue all together. Or they could ignore the judge - which they have to work with - and arrest the person (as they did).

I personally don't think it's right for the 'bosses' to fire him for seeking clarification on something they had not addressed and should have.

Trump thugs take orders from no one else.
 
Trump thugs take orders from no one else.
Speaking of thugs:

“According to online court records, Castro, 33, of Milwaukee, was facing charges of operating without a valid license for the second time in three years. Wisconsin court records show he was previously convicted of felony stalking and disorderly conduct in Milwaukee County, in 2023 and 2025.”
 
Back
Top Bottom