[W:542] Star Harvard business professor stripped of tenure, fired for manipulating data in studies on dishonesty

[NOLA Dude]

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she fabricated data on multiple studies focused on dishonesty.

Francesca Gino, a celebrated behavioral scientist at Harvard Business School, was let go after the school’s top governing board determined she tweaked observations in four studies so that their findings boosted her hypotheses, GHB reported.

Harvard administrators notified business faculty that Gino was out of a job in a closed-door meeting this past week, the outlet reported.

Star Harvard business professor stripped of tenure, fired for manipulating data in studies on dishonesty

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she allegedly manipulated data to support multiple studies she conducted.

nypost.com

We are supposed to trust the "experts" right? It reminded me of this:

 

[Loulit01]

LOL. She cheated on dishonesty studies. LOL

 

[Jezcoe]

Expert was cheating and caught by other experts is proof that we shouldn't trust the experts.

 

[j brown's body]

MAGA surprised by institutional accountability.

 

[Taylor]

The "publish or perish" model is ruining science.

 

[lynnwinslow]

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she fabricated data on multiple studies focused on dishonesty.

Francesca Gino, a celebrated behavioral scientist at Harvard Business School, was let go after the school’s top governing board determined she tweaked observations in four studies so that their findings boosted her hypotheses, GHB reported.

Harvard administrators notified business faculty that Gino was out of a job in a closed-door meeting this past week, the outlet reported.

Star Harvard business professor stripped of tenure, fired for manipulating data in studies on dishonesty

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she allegedly manipulated data to support multiple studies she conducted.

nypost.com

We are supposed to trust the "experts" right? It reminded me of this:

Sucks for her.
Glad she was caught and is facing the consequences of her lies and cheating.

 

[Cameron]

Harvard fired her, seems like the right decision. Not sure why the OP is creaming his pants about it -- it's the right that never holds its people accoutable for their constant lying, manipulation, and corruption.

 

[PeteEU]

Expert was cheating and caught by other experts is proof that we shouldn't trust the experts.

So who should we trust? Pedophile priests? Pedophile billionaires? Who?

 

[yankintx]

LOL. She cheated on dishonesty studies. LOL

That is some irony yup !

 

[Bergslagstroll]

MAGA surprised by institutional accountability.

That's the difference between science and politics.

Poll: Persistent Partisan Divide Over ‘Birther’ Question

Seventy-two percent of registered Republican voters still doubt President Obama’s citizenship, according to a recent NBC News|SurveyMonkey poll.

www.nbcnews.com

After Three Years and Many Indictments, the “Big Lie” That Led to the January 6th Insurrection Is Still Believed by Most Republicans | PRRI

January 6, 2024 marks the third anniversary of the unprecedented assault on our nation’s Capitol, in which Trump supporters attempted to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Analysis of PRRI data shows that distinct partisan differences about the events leading up to January 6...

www.prri.org

More than 30 bomb threats made in Springfield, Ohio, after false pets claims

Former President Donald Trump and his running mate have prompted the false claims that migrants are eating people’s pets in the Ohio city, which officials have denied.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[j brown's body]

So who should we trust? Pedophile priests? Pedophile billionaires? Who?

Twitter seems to be his go to, which is kind of classic since they explicitly support publishing disinformation.

 

[j brown's body]

That's the difference between science and politics.

Poll: Persistent Partisan Divide Over ‘Birther’ Question

Seventy-two percent of registered Republican voters still doubt President Obama’s citizenship, according to a recent NBC News|SurveyMonkey poll.

www.nbcnews.com

After Three Years and Many Indictments, the “Big Lie” That Led to the January 6th Insurrection Is Still Believed by Most Republicans | PRRI

January 6, 2024 marks the third anniversary of the unprecedented assault on our nation’s Capitol, in which Trump supporters attempted to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Analysis of PRRI data shows that distinct partisan differences about the events leading up to January 6...

www.prri.org

More than 30 bomb threats made in Springfield, Ohio, after false pets claims

Former President Donald Trump and his running mate have prompted the false claims that migrants are eating people’s pets in the Ohio city, which officials have denied.

www.nbcnews.com

The rules of The Art of the Deal include pushing lies that benefit you (sometimes refered to generously as "positive thinking") and never admit you're wrong.

 

[MamboDervish]

Expert was cheating and caught by other experts is proof that we shouldn't trust the experts.

Indeed. Why should we trust the "experts" who say she was cheating?

 

[MamboDervish]

Twitter seems to be his go to, which is kind of classic since they explicitly support publishing disinformation.

?? Twitter ?? Are you referring to Pravda Social?

 

[Peter]

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she fabricated data on multiple studies focused on dishonesty.

Francesca Gino, a celebrated behavioral scientist at Harvard Business School, was let go after the school’s top governing board determined she tweaked observations in four studies so that their findings boosted her hypotheses, GHB reported.

Harvard administrators notified business faculty that Gino was out of a job in a closed-door meeting this past week, the outlet reported.

Star Harvard business professor stripped of tenure, fired for manipulating data in studies on dishonesty

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she allegedly manipulated data to support multiple studies she conducted.

nypost.com

We are supposed to trust the "experts" right? It reminded me of this:

That's like saying because one surgeon mistreated his patients we shouldn't trust any surgeons.

 

[Napoleon]

Twitter seems to be his go to, which is kind of classic since they explicitly support publishing disinformation.

As opposed to scientific journals which are, unlike Twitter, supposed to be the holy grail of reliability but are actively publishing fraudulent papers and disinformation? Most of the papers she has been fired over were published over 10 years ago. What happened to the gatekeepers who are supposed to be doing peer review before publication?

 

[Lovebug]

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she fabricated data on multiple studies focused on dishonesty.

Francesca Gino, a celebrated behavioral scientist at Harvard Business School, was let go after the school’s top governing board determined she tweaked observations in four studies so that their findings boosted her hypotheses, GHB reported.

Harvard administrators notified business faculty that Gino was out of a job in a closed-door meeting this past week, the outlet reported.

Star Harvard business professor stripped of tenure, fired for manipulating data in studies on dishonesty

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she allegedly manipulated data to support multiple studies she conducted.

nypost.com

We are supposed to trust the "experts" right? It reminded me of this:

Would be nice if felons were getting fired.

 

[Napoleon]

Would be nice if felons were getting fired.

I’m sure there’s a felony in there if any of those studies were publicly funded.

 

[Cope]

So who should we trust? Pedophile priests? Pedophile billionaires? Who?

That's a good question. Once we have ruined everyone's influence because they all can't be trusted, then who ...

Hmmm

The media lies, covers up, and has increasingly more bias.
Politicians lie, cover up, cheat, scam, grow rich.
Doctors/experts are swayed by the need to be published, or pharmaceutical companies.
The government is constantly caught with their pants down, lieing, covering up.

You tell me who YOU trust.

 

[VanceMack]

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she fabricated data on multiple studies focused on dishonesty.

Francesca Gino, a celebrated behavioral scientist at Harvard Business School, was let go after the school’s top governing board determined she tweaked observations in four studies so that their findings boosted her hypotheses, GHB reported.

Harvard administrators notified business faculty that Gino was out of a job in a closed-door meeting this past week, the outlet reported.

Star Harvard business professor stripped of tenure, fired for manipulating data in studies on dishonesty

A renowned Harvard University professor was stripped of her tenure and fired after an investigation found she allegedly manipulated data to support multiple studies she conducted.

nypost.com

We are supposed to trust the "experts" right? It reminded me of this:

During doctorate program studies you are literally taught how to manipulate questions utilizing programs like SMSS to determine which questions asked will produce favorable results. Qualitative research analysis teaches where, when, and who to seek out survey results from to secure favorable findings. Even 20 years ago we were asking why research was only considered viable if the findings matched the dissertation 'question'... and why instead wasnt research and study findings deemed just as valuable if the research disproved hypothesis. The same work and effort went into the research, writing, delivery and defense and the whole purpose of the dissertation experience was to expose students to process. Even back then (and I'm certain long before then), academia was not asking honest questions...they were pursuing results to match predicted outcomes.

 

[Napoleon]

That's a good question. Once we have ruined everyone's influence because they all can't be trusted, then who ...

Hmmm

The media lies, covers up, and has increasingly more bias.
Politicians lie, cover up, cheat, scam, grow rich.
Doctors/experts are swayed by the need to be published, or pharmaceutical companies.
The government is constantly caught with their pants down, lieing, covering up.

You tell me who YOU trust.

The whole point of the Enlightenment was to trust no one but yourself. Truth is everyone just traded one argumentum ad verecundiam for another.

 

[VanceMack]

Would be nice if felons were getting fired.

You mean many famous actors, business owners, professors, political activists, middle income workers, and even CEOs...or are you just determined to shit yourself and scream TRUUUUUUUUUMP!!!! in yet another thread that has **** all to do with Trump?

 

[Taylor]

As opposed to scientific journals which are, unlike Twitter, supposed to be the holy grail of reliability but are actively publishing disinformation? Most of the papers she has been fired over were published over 10 years ago. What happened to the gatekeepers who are supposed to be doing peer review before publication?

Even the most prestigious journals are full of statistical errors. The peer review process doesn't catch them because often the peer reviewers are no more mathematicians than the study author.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Harvard fired her, seems like the right decision. Not sure why the OP is creaming his pants about it -- it's the right that never holds its people accoutable for their constant lying, manipulation, and corruption.

'Cause it tarnished Harvard
'Cause it tarnished science
'Cause it tarnished an educated female with a foreign name

You know the OP would not be starting a thread if it was about a white middle aged male professor at Liberty.

 

[PeteEU]

Twitter seems to be his go to, which is kind of classic since they explicitly support publishing disinformation.

So neo Nazis and Putin/China/North Korea bots?