- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 13,179
- Reaction score
- 3,662
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Women can shoot, men can't have babies.
Women can shoot, men can't have babies.
Women can shoot, men can't have babies.
In the abortion folder I started a thread that questioned whether or not men should be involved in the abortion debate since men don't get pregnant. I then compared that to the concept of whether or not women should be involved in the gun debate since the world of guns is mostly a man's world. Go to any gun shop, class, or shooting range and most of the people there will be men.
That has changed and its continuing to change as more and more women are getting into guns and within the last decade the number of women who own and use guns and are for gun rights has exploded. This makes sense since a gun will enable a woman to stop a much stronger man. So I will say this much, for the most part women should not be involved in the gun debate but I will make an exception for women who own and use guns and who are for gun rights. Somebody such as Kamala Harris should not be involved in the gun debate because even though she does own a gun herself for "personal safety" she is against other people having gun rights. So like Bloomberg she is a super hypocrite.
So in conclusion, should women such as Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely not. Should Kaitlin Bennett and Carolyn D Meadows be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely. Women should not have a voice in the gun debate but there should be an exception for women who are for gun rights.
In the abortion folder I started a thread that questioned whether or not men should be involved in the abortion debate since men don't get pregnant. I then compared that to the concept of whether or not women should be involved in the gun debate since the world of guns is mostly a man's world. Go to any gun shop, class, or shooting range and most of the people there will be men.
That has changed and its continuing to change as more and more women are getting into guns and within the last decade the number of women who own and use guns and are for gun rights has exploded. This makes sense since a gun will enable a woman to stop a much stronger man. So I will say this much, for the most part women should not be involved in the gun debate but I will make an exception for women who own and use guns and who are for gun rights. Somebody such as Kamala Harris should not be involved in the gun debate because even though she does own a gun herself for "personal safety" she is against other people having gun rights. So like Bloomberg she is a super hypocrite.
So in conclusion, should women such as Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely not. Should Kaitlin Bennett and Carolyn D Meadows be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely. Women should not have a voice in the gun debate but there should be an exception for women who are for gun rights.
In the abortion folder I started a thread that questioned whether or not men should be involved in the abortion debate since men don't get pregnant. I then compared that to the concept of whether or not women should be involved in the gun debate since the world of guns is mostly a man's world. Go to any gun shop, class, or shooting range and most of the people there will be men.
That has changed and its continuing to change as more and more women are getting into guns and within the last decade the number of women who own and use guns and are for gun rights has exploded. This makes sense since a gun will enable a woman to stop a much stronger man. So I will say this much, for the most part women should not be involved in the gun debate but I will make an exception for women who own and use guns and who are for gun rights. Somebody such as Kamala Harris should not be involved in the gun debate because even though she does own a gun herself for "personal safety" she is against other people having gun rights. So like Bloomberg she is a super hypocrite.
So in conclusion, should women such as Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely not. Should Kaitlin Bennett and Carolyn D Meadows be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely. Women should not have a voice in the gun debate but there should be an exception for women who are for gun rights.
Women own guns too.
Women can shoot, men can't have babies.
That is a nice picture.
In the abortion folder I started a thread that questioned whether or not men should be involved in the abortion debate since men don't get pregnant. I then compared that to the concept of whether or not women should be involved in the gun debate since the world of guns is mostly a man's world. Go to any gun shop, class, or shooting range and most of the people there will be men.
That has changed and its continuing to change as more and more women are getting into guns and within the last decade the number of women who own and use guns and are for gun rights has exploded. This makes sense since a gun will enable a woman to stop a much stronger man. So I will say this much, for the most part women should not be involved in the gun debate but I will make an exception for women who own and use guns and who are for gun rights. Somebody such as Kamala Harris should not be involved in the gun debate because even though she does own a gun herself for "personal safety" she is against other people having gun rights. So like Bloomberg she is a super hypocrite.
So in conclusion, should women such as Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely not. Should Kaitlin Bennett and Carolyn D Meadows be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely. Women should not have a voice in the gun debate but there should be an exception for women who are for gun rights.
So in conclusion, should women such as Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely not. Should Kaitlin Bennett and Carolyn D Meadows be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely. Women should not have a voice in the gun debate but there should be an exception for women who are for gun rights.
Women can shoot, men can't have babies.
Like I said, there should be exceptions for women who do shoot and do believe in gun rights.
If she believes in gun rights, yes she is. Reread my first post. Women Being Involved In The Gun DebateYep, but according to you she's not eligible to discuss guns with manly men like you :roll:
In the abortion folder I started a thread that questioned whether or not men should be involved in the abortion debate since men don't get pregnant. I then compared that to the concept of whether or not women should be involved in the gun debate since the world of guns is mostly a man's world. Go to any gun shop, class, or shooting range and most of the people there will be men.
That has changed and its continuing to change as more and more women are getting into guns and within the last decade the number of women who own and use guns and are for gun rights has exploded. This makes sense since a gun will enable a woman to stop a much stronger man. So I will say this much, for the most part women should not be involved in the gun debate but I will make an exception for women who own and use guns and who are for gun rights. Somebody such as Kamala Harris should not be involved in the gun debate because even though she does own a gun herself for "personal safety" she is against other people having gun rights. So like Bloomberg she is a super hypocrite.
So in conclusion, should women such as Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely not. Should Kaitlin Bennett and Carolyn D Meadows be involved in the gun debate? Absolutely. Women should not have a voice in the gun debate but there should be an exception for women who are for gun rights.
No that's not what I said.So, only people who agree with you should be allowed to vote then? There's a name for that kind of ideology and it aint a pretty one. There's nothing whatsoever "slight" about your "conservatism".
If she believes in gun rights, yes she is. Reread my first post. Women Being Involved In The Gun Debate
I will say this much, for the most part women should not be involved in the gun debate but I will make an exception for women who own and use guns and who are for gun rights.
They should be excluded not just for their gender but also for the position they take.Why should anyone be excluded from any debate based on their gender? What the heck does gender have to do with guns?
If you're against pedophilia you wouldn't abuse pre-pubescent children, at least not sexually. I seriously doubt you would do the very thing you're against.So if I'm against pedophilia, I shouldn't be able to say it unless I abuse kids? You really don't see how ridiculous your logic is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?