• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:37]Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Int. Notes

Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

What makes it so is that you gave up on defending the op


I provided the counterpoint - there is no evidence

ANY example of resistance to discovery and possible malfeasance on the part of the FBI bolsters the concept that they are engaged in malfeasance in the OP, goes to show a pattern of behavior.

You aren't familiar with actual evidence are you?
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note


Red:
...And how do we "discover" that? The word "Pientka" isn't even in the documents.
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

ANY example of resistance to discovery and possible malfeasance on the part of the FBI bolsters the concept that they are engaged in malfeasance in the OP, goes to show a pattern of behavior.

You aren't familiar with actual evidence are you?

There is no evidence of any such resistance or malfeasance
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note


We know about Pientka from a letter from Sen. Grassley to FBI Director Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein from May 11, 2018.

https://www.scribd.com/document/378959078/Grassley-Letter-to-FBI-FLYNN-Document-Requests-BIG-DEAL

btw, to this date, the FBI and DOJ still refuse to allow Pientka to appear before any Congressional committee and the 302's from the Strzok/Pientka/Flynn interview have not been released.


Off topic...

People like to crow about "years of investigations and nothing found"!! Well, this kind of action from our DOJ and FBI is the main reason that happens.
 
Last edited:
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

There is no evidence of any such resistance or malfeasance

Sure there is, you were just given two examples, three if you count the OP.

Argument to the stone, Sangha?
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

Duplicate reply
 
Last edited:
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

Sure there is, you were just given two examples, three if you count the OP.

Argument to the stone, Sangha?

the quotes posted do not support the claims in the op
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

the quotes posted do not support the claims in the op

They give evidence of more behavior by the special counsel of prosecutorial abuse.

Its like you constantly trolling threads, odds are you are trolling a thread whenever you make an appearance because you have shown a proclivity for doing so.
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

They give evidence of more behavior by the special counsel of prosecutorial abuse.

the quotes posted do not support the claims in the op
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

the quotes posted do not support the claims in the op

Argument to the stone fallacy. You have given no evidence, you have supported nothing except your opinion. Evidence of prosecutorial abuse lends credence to other claims of such. Goes to credibility.
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

Moderator's Warning:
The topic is not each other. If you see a violation, report it, don't discuss it.
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

because I made no claim

Your claim is that the three incidents I have related all show possible abuse. You claim they do not. Your word as rebuttal isn't sufficient, care to provide some evidence?
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

No, that is not my claim.

That's unhelpful, present your claim.
 
Re: Special Counsel Responds to Request for FBI Notes Fails to Submit Agent's January Interview Note

I made no claim

Then we are done. Even a negative claim requires some evidence. Your word alone is not enough.
 
~ After today's court appearance it seems judge Sullivan does not care ...
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…