- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Messages
- 8,009
- Reaction score
- 1,428
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Change its words, no - but to change its intent/meaning, yes.
Not one thing in there was myself speaking for myself and my own views.
You lose and lose big.
Not one I said there in any of those quotes denies anyone the right granted by The Second Amendment.
I am proud of every one of those statements and stand behind them.
Wut??
Where are they granted that power?
I wish we would execute traitors also - lets being with the one in the White House who conspired with our main adversary to steal the election.
That is patently false. Here is another poster
Almost any modern rifle from the past half century is capable of firing more than the one shot referred to in the post.
There is no straw man. I was replying to an argument made right here.
I am NOT denying any past argument. I am proud of each one of them and stand behind them.
And nothing in my words would take away the right of an American citizen to keep and bear arms.
What people want to believe because it agrees with their political bias is their problem. Nothing I said in the post you quoted would deny any American the right to keep and bear arms.
It's a long story, but essentially the SCOTUS has the final word on what is (or is not) Constituional. To make matters even more complicated, the SCOTUS can decide to simply ignore making any ruling on a matter (case) and thus passing that awesome power to a lower court.
...Holy Wikipedia Link...
yeah- me and Ronald Reagan, who was named and honored as a lifetime friend of the NRA. :lol::roll:
Engaging in silly name calling is not debate.
Its convenient to hide behind a dead President is it? Focus, we are speaking about your nonsense, you can quit baiting.
Paradox.
Contextomy fallacy. No court has the authority to change the meaning of any phrase in the Constitution or to change the Constitution in any way.
As long as you are content with the federal government granting itself ever more powers then I guess all is well.
A vet and an MD.
All your posts have already been spoken to and refuted. Repeating them again each day will only get you this appropriate response.
Mantra Dogen 1. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
Reagan isn't the topic, quit diverting. It's easy to see you are playing games because your own words damn your argument.Actually its easy to identify with Reagan since he was a dirty low down pinko commie gun banner also. [emoji38]:mrgreen::roll::lamo
Strawman, never used that argument or those words. You are again resorting to fallacies.Actually its easy to identify with Reagan since he was a dirty low down pinko commie gun banner also. [emoji38]:mrgreen::roll::lamo
Reagan isn't the topic, quit diverting. It's easy to see you are playing games because your own words damn your argument.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
Strawman, never used that argument or those words. You are again resorting to fallacies.
Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
I used obvious sarcasm to expose your unhealthy obsession with me. If you cannot recognize that - its not me with the comprehension problem.
Not one thing I have advocated would deny any citizen their Second Amendment rights.
Ronald Reagan is a wonderful and excellent example of the brush you are attempting to tar me with. And because of your continued attacks one me - Ronnie is my best ally in this situation.
Its convenient to hide behind a dead President is it? Focus, we are speaking about your nonsense, you can quit baiting.
Enough with your scummy ****ing accusations. You are on a debate forum, I am replying to your retarded opinions.
EVERYTHING you advocate would INFRINGE on their Second Amendment rights, you don't have to deny the right to infringe on it. Another of your facile little distortions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?