• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: #1262] Trump lawyers to use ‘conflict of interest’ between judge, Carroll’s attorney in appeal of $83.3M jury verdict: ‘Insane’

Overitall said:
Trump already stated he plans on appealing. Until that has ran its course Carroll gets nothing.
Click to expand...
Correct, but the POS has to put the money into escrow, so he won't have it either. That puts almost $90 million in escrow, diminishing his liquid assets, with another upcoming trial going for over $300 mill. & I think he is relying on the same Legal Team. Good luck...
 
You're asking a Trump supporter to stop defending Trump ??????
 
Actually, that trial is over and all that awaits are Engoron's decisions. He set a goal of 1/31/24 but that is not in stone.
 
Overitall said:
Strawman. When did I say she wouldn't get paid?

Personal attack noted.
Click to expand...

Holy shit with you and the personal attack accusations. I’m not attacking you. I’m trying to help you understand where you are failing to grasp what has been repeatedly explained to you.
 
Superfly said:
Holy shit with you and the personal attack accusations. I’m not attacking you. I’m trying to help you understand where you are failing to grasp what has been repeatedly explained to you.
Click to expand...
This poster does this more times than not. It's a diversionary tactic when starting to lose the argument.
 
Overitall said:
In a civil case the bar is set lower. Add to that equation the demographic of the jury pool and guilt is pretty much a foregone conclusion. Set the trial in a predominantly Republican district and the outcome would most likely be different.
Click to expand...

Add the that the itter corruption of the defendant...
 
Airyaman said:
This poster does this more times than not. It's a diversionary tactic when starting to lose the argument.
Click to expand...
Give me something better to work with and I might be interested in considering any of them. But, know this, snarky comments and personal attacks are not conducive to civil discussion and I will lose interest in anything you have to say.

"Political bias optional; civility a MUST!"
 
Dude, we see you. You've taken this tactic with me almost every time we've interacted with each other. So if you demand civility, look in the e-mirror.
 
Jay Falcon said:
The word of an admitted ***** grabbrer vs the woman who actually won the trial. There was no affair. Please stop defending the sexual predator.
Click to expand...
Trump and his loyal worshipers always blame the victim, when they are the predator. It's how they roll.
 
Airyaman said:
Dude, we see you. You've taken this tactic with me almost every time we've interacted with other. So if you demand civility, look in the e-mirror.
Click to expand...
Enjoy the rest of your day.
 
Overitall said:
In a civil case the bar is set lower. Add to that equation the demographic of the jury pool and guilt is pretty much a foregone conclusion. Set the trial in a predominantly Republican district and the outcome would most likely be different.
Click to expand...
The he should have assaulted her in a Republican district.
 
Trump has been adjudicated a rapist in a judge's ruling. So, to start, you will be voting for a rapist this November. However, because Trump is an utterly despicable human being. He has defamed his sexual assault victim, and a jury hit him with an $83,000,000 verdict. One would think that any decent, conscionable human being would say, "You know, I don't like Biden, but I can't support a rapist that defames his own victim.", one would think that would be the case.
 
Jay Falcon said:
Maybe, maybe not. You're alleging the jurors were not impartial with zero evidence. Trump got a fair trial and lost.
Click to expand...
People (even jurists) have political biases. Among democrats Trump is guilty (prejudged) of everything he's accused of. Among Republicans, he's given a benefit of doubt. Present me with evidence that this claim is not valid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.