emilymariee
New member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2017
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
According to the Massachusetts Legislature, children must be vaccinated against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, and poliomyelitis before entering school unless there is some endangering reason to the child why they cannot have the vaccination. Many believe this should continue to stay a law, but in the past 20 years, this has been a question if this should stay a law as more and more parents are against vaccinating their children.
What are your thoughts?
That if you consult your pediatrician and he recommends the vaccinations are safe for your child, and you dont do it, you are a very ignorant and dangerous parent.
According to the Massachusetts Legislature, children must be vaccinated against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, and poliomyelitis before entering school unless there is some endangering reason to the child why they cannot have the vaccination. Many believe this should continue to stay a law, but in the past 20 years, this has been a question if this should stay a law as more and more parents are against vaccinating their children.
What are your thoughts?
According to the Massachusetts Legislature, children must be vaccinated against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, and poliomyelitis before entering school unless there is some endangering reason to the child why they cannot have the vaccination. Many believe this should continue to stay a law, but in the past 20 years, this has been a question if this should stay a law as more and more parents are against vaccinating their children.
What are your thoughts?
Another pseudo-intellectually empty response, please feel free to provide us with facts that refute my statement that vaccination programs are better for individuals and society.That could be straight out of A Brave New World but is comfortingly less fascistoid than 1989.
schools and hospitals are incubators, so i support requiring kids to be vaccinated before they are allowed to attend.
Vaccination programs (required vaccination) can require catastrophic consequences? Require how? And please specify these catastrophic circumstances. And please also specify what change(s) is needed for the Constitution.That might be alright for private schools. For public schools such a restriction would require catastrophic circumstances or a change to the Constitution I should think.
Another pseudo-intellectually empty response, please feel free to provide us with facts that refute my statement that vaccination programs are better for individuals and society.
That might be alright for private schools. For public schools such a restriction would require catastrophic circumstances or a change to the Constitution I should think.
I realize your statist approach to individual rights. But you do surprise me that you might think of having read standard parables of our culture might be confused with intellectualism.
Vaccination programs (required vaccination) can require catastrophic consequences? Require how? And please specify these catastrophic circumstances. And please also specify what change(s) is needed for the Constitution.
Please be specific.
Vaccination programs (required vaccination) can require catastrophic consequences? Require how? And please specify these catastrophic circumstances. And please also specify what change(s) is needed for the Constitution.
Please be specific.
That is not actually, what I wrote. But again, I know you like to react to what you would like to have been written instead of what was. That helps, when the answer would otherwise be not only complicated but show up your opinion as somewhat unsavory.
That might be alright for private schools. For public schools such a restriction would require catastrophic circumstances or a change to the Constitution I should think.
Vaccination programs (required vaccination) can require catastrophic consequences? Require how? And please specify these catastrophic circumstances. And please also specify what change(s) is needed for the Constitution.
Please be specific.
That is not actually, what I wrote. But again, I know you like to react to what you would like to have been written instead of what was. That helps, when the answer would otherwise be not only complicated but show up your opinion as somewhat unsavory.
That might be alright for private schools. For public schools such a restriction would require catastrophic circumstances or a change to the Constitution I should think.
According to the Massachusetts Legislature, children must be vaccinated against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, and poliomyelitis before entering school unless there is some endangering reason to the child why they cannot have the vaccination. Many believe this should continue to stay a law, but in the past 20 years, this has been a question if this should stay a law as more and more parents are against vaccinating their children.
What are your thoughts?
nah. you don't have a constitutional right to make other kids sick because your parents are idiots who don't fully understand how herd immunity works. however, if you are allergic to eggs, you shouldn't be required to be vaccinated until all vaccines are made in cell culture.
Nowhere in the constitution does it say you have a right to put children in danger because you are a moron.
True. But that is not the protection afforded by the Constitution. But like in the other two responses, if you don't even know, which rights are protected here, you either have never thought about it or you have purposely ignored the issue. No problem with that, but either case makes it uninteresting to discuss it with you.
True. The Constitutional right kicks in earlier.
You were politely asked to specify those Constitutional protections already. Now you refer to them again, without specifing which and how.
It seems that rather than explain your responses, you prefer to pretend like it's too complex to do so and so drop the discussion. That seems like an odd attitude on a discussion forum.
I believe that I pointed out that you cannot be interested or are willfully ignoring the issues involved. In either case, it is uninteresting to discuss it with you.
That might be alright for private schools. For public schools such a restriction would require catastrophic circumstances or a change to the Constitution I should think.
That forced vaccinations should be illegal.
That taxes should be reduced for parents that do not vaccinate and are not allowed to send their kids to school.
That other people mind their own business...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?