• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Va. DNA data support innocence of 33 convicted of sex crimes, study concludes

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
18,615
Reaction score
9,262
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
Yet one more example of why the death penalty is not such a good thing - when the prosecution errs and an innocent person is convicted, they ain't coming back from execution

Va. DNA data support innocence of 33 convicted of sex crimes, study concludes

The institute estimates a wrongful conviction rate in sexual assault cases of between 8 to 15 percent, comparable with the results in sample testing that exonerated two people and prompted then-Gov. Mark R. Warner to order the full Virginia project in 2005.

...

Brandon Garrett, a University of Virginia School of Law professor, also thinks the study needs a strong response from policy makers. "I think this report isn't the final report, it's just the beginning," he said.

...

This year the General Assembly, concerned that potential exonerations were not being adequately investigated, directed the department, effective July 1, to release the test results in cases where testing failed to find the convicted person's DNA. The legislators' concern stemmed from the case of Bennett S. Barbour, of Charles City County, who was wrongly convicted of a 1978 rape in Williamsburg and was one of the people excluded by testing who could not be initially found by mail.

Testing in June 2010 cleared him and implicated a convicted rapist who will be tried for the crime in August. Barbour did not learn about the DNA testing until 18 months later when a volunteer lawyer tracked him down via telephone.
 
Yet one more example of why the death penalty is not such a good thing - when the prosecution errs and an innocent person is convicted, they ain't coming back from execution

NOOOOOO! They're pedophiles and rapists; we should have shot them right after the trial! Then we wouldn't even have to worry about whether they were really innocent or guilty, we get to kill someone and feel good about ourselves for having done so!
 
NOOOOOO! They're pedophiles and rapists; we should have shot them right after the trial! Then we wouldn't even have to worry about whether they were really innocent or guilty, we get to kill someone and feel good about ourselves for having done so!
Trials are for whiny liberals. We don't need no stinkin' trials.
 
Back
Top Bottom