- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
So the pirates are promising revenge against the US for rescuing one of our own? They are on very thin ice. I like the fact that Obama is letting the military do what the military does best - killing, and I also like the thought of hitting the pirate bases and home turf. After all, pirates can't be pirates if they are homeless and boatless, can they? Pirates can't do much if their bodies are blown to bits either.
I say smack the hell out of them for a couple of weeks, and see if that prods them to seek a new profession. If it doesn't, then smack 'em again, and keep smacking 'em until they either get the message (Don't screw with the US) or they are dead.
Article is here.
Wait a minute, is this what Obama promised us? I thought it was the economy stupid. Rescuing is one thing, now he's escalating things.
Unilaterlism is no the UN way.What about unilateralism?
While some Somali pirates are threatening to take revenge for two deadly international assaults which disrupted their kidnapping plots the last week, the US military is mulling taking the fight to their bases.
Idiots.
Who held who's citizens hostage? :roll:
Just kids with guns...
Whether this makes sense or not will be determined by the intelligence they will be gathering over the coming days/weeks/months.
I'd like to know if the president ever got Congressional approval for the anti-piracy task force off of Somalia. I'm opposed to any attacks on land-based pirate assets, especially without Congressional approval. Attacking the pirates would open a can of worms we do not want to open. They will become more heavily armed, more dangerous, and will demand higher ransoms due to increased risk. Not to mention any attack on pirates would result in large civilian deaths and will tarnish the US image abroad more than it already is.
There is a long history, and the problem is growing.
They took an American ship and tried another...
... for me it's "one Strike and You're Out".
There's what, 200 hostages in the hands of pirates at the moment?
Time is NOW to rid the waters of this scourge.
.
You don't think they won't become more and more armed and aggressive left unchecked?
My guess is it will get worse unless halted.
.
That's 1% too many.Around 1% of ships actually get hijacked but people make it sound like it is the end of the world and every ship is being hijacked.
Agressive against whom? The neighbours?
Appeasement has worked for decades, not going to stop anytime. Bombing will solve nothing and neither will entering Somalia.
You do realise going past Somalia is not the only shipping lane. One can go past South Africa which is much more safer.
Around 1% of ships actually get hijacked but people make it sound like it is the end of the world and every ship is being hijacked.
That's 1% too many.
Not every ship around the Horn is attacked. Every ship around the Horn is at risk. Every ship around the Horn has to contend with the additional cost of that risk.
That's why the 1% is too many.
Less than 1%, certainly....
But how in the world could this course be altered? Are you suggesting that the ships should go West, through the Suez canal, and all the way around the continent? Going around the corner to get next door?
If they don't want to get hijacked, seems logical to me to find another path
When was piracy ever eliminated by any other means?Sure it does, until you realize the path you're suggesting adds thousands of miles to the trip. Basically, they've decided it's cheaper to go past Somalia and pay the ransom on the very slight chance that their ships are taken. They're within their rights according to international law.
Like I said before, I have no qualms with rescue operations to preserve life and property, but trying to "eliminate piracy" through force is an irrational objective.
When was piracy ever eliminated by any other means?
The not packing of weapons is due in large part to international treaty--the lack of arms is part of what makes a ship a civilian merchantman.If you know pirates operate there and you go there knowingly and it gets hijacked and didn't pack weapons ... They are stupid and should be out of the shipping business.
When was piracy ever eliminated by any other means?
The not packing of weapons is due in large part to international treaty.
It's up to the Puntland authorities who are recognized by the UN as the "government of Somalia" (in the de jure sense at least) to end piracy in accordance with their international obligations.
LOL, Puntland abide by laws? Those out of control savages who are in Govt?
Puntland are the ones who are funding it. They have been building ports and smuggling weapons for the Islamists along with the south for a very long time.
The govt. gets bribes off the pirates which means that when they are caught, they are released without a hanging
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?