- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 68,960
- Reaction score
- 22,530
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
From the BBC
United States dilutes UN rape-in-war resolution
The Trump administration's opposition to abortion has led to the watering-down of a UN resolution on ending sexual violence in war.
The US removed all references to sexual and reproductive health.
The Security Council resolution, submitted by Germany, dropped all such references. The US, along with China and Russia, had threatened to veto it.
The Trump administration opposed a phrase on the grounds that it implies support for abortion.
COMMENT:-
Isn't it nice to see the US lining up with those progressive states that have such an enviable record with respect to human rights as China and Russia?
Not sure which is worse... Trump injecting domestic views on "reproductive health" (i.e. abortion) onto the international stage, or us actually thinking a "UN Resolution" does all that much.
Good point.
Of course, since it isn't likely that any views expressed by either the Republicans ("The MORE Reactionary Wing of the American Oligarchic Capitalist Party"0 or the Democrats ("The LESS Reactionary Wing of the American Oligarchic Capitalist Party") will every find sufficient support to win the next election we should all stop expressing them because the ONLY thing that counts is "gaining power" and moral or ethical positions outside of those approved by the American Oligarchic Capitalist Party should never be expressed.
To be fair, UN resolutions really dont mean much unless they are used as justification for armed intervention by either the US or a regional superpower. Thats the only time they ever come into play.
French UN ambassador Francois Delattre was scathing of the decision to exclude the reference to sexual health, saying it undermined the dignity of women.
"It is intolerable and incomprehensible that the Security Council is incapable of acknowledging that women and girls who suffered from sexual violence in conflict, and who obviously didn't choose to become pregnant, should have the right to terminate their pregnancy," he said.
Cool dude, so you are for rape and child abuse... Good to know.Sounds like they're trying to bilk other countries into paying for a ****load of abortions.
And we all know who would wind up paying most of the bill: The United States.
Cool dude, so you are for rape and child abuse... Good to know.
Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
Your country is on the list of freeloaders that don't pay their NATO bill.
And your president is the clown who thinks it's alright to deny coverage for rape victims when it comes to abortion.
Sickening, and by comparison, your side looks way worse.
Sounds like they're trying to bilk other countries into paying for a ****load of abortions.
And we all know who would wind up paying most of the bill: The United States.
Your country is on the list of freeloaders that don't pay their NATO bill.
I'm so glad to see that you approve of "combat rapes". After all, we all know that you believe that they really are all the women's fault and so the women should be punished for making the choice to allow themselves to be raped.
And what bill would that be?
Please provide verifiable, third party, statistics on the percentage of GDP per capita that the US spends on defending NATO interests in Europe in comparison with the percentage of GDP per capita that the other NATO members spend on defending NATO interests in Europe.
PLEASE NOTE that amounts that the US spends on defending non-NATO interests in Europe does not count.
PLEASE NOTE that "a speech by Donald Trump does not count as "verifiable, third party, statistics" and neither does a "Tweet".
And what bill would that be?
Please provide verifiable, third party, statistics on the percentage of GDP per capita that the US spends on defending NATO interests in Europe in comparison with the percentage of GDP per capita that the other NATO members spend on defending NATO interests in Europe.
PLEASE NOTE that amounts that the US spends on defending non-NATO interests in Europe does not count.
PLEASE NOTE that "a speech by Donald Trump does not count as "verifiable, third party, statistics" and neither does a "Tweet".
Your country is on the list of freeloaders that don't pay their NATO bill.
In 2017, the U.S. accounted for 51.1 percent of NATO's combined GDP and 71.7 percent of its combined defense expenditure. In short, the U.S. contributed more funds to NATO than Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and Canada combined.
How much NATO allies spent on defense in 2017
Your country needs to tighten up. :lamo
And how much of the US spending goes to NATO related stuff? A very small part.
LOL we pay what we are suppose too at this time. Now you can call us a freeloader if we have not increased our contribution when the deadline hits in 4 years, but for now we are meeting our obligations. Now of course you listen only to your dear leader and his Russian mafia handlers.
This resolution isn't going to prevent rapes. This is about providing abortions to the victims. Did you even read the source?
Most of those rapes are probably committed by UN forces, anyway. :lamo
Child sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers - Wikipedia
Did you happen to notice that the word "abortion" does not appear even once in the resolution.
Since no one is arguing that SOME of the cases of rape have NOT been committed by UN forces, would you please provide the statistics (the availability immediately to your hand I have zero doubt on) that shows the percentages so that we can all see what your definition of the word "most" is.
Of course, should you NOT provide statistics that prove that at least 50%+1 of the relevant cases of rape were committed by UN personnel then shall be forced to conclude that your statement is likely to be "culus extraxerunt tuae" and deal with it accordingly. Should you not provide any actual data whatsoever, then I will, most reluctantly, be forced to conclude that your statement is "quod culus tibi quam e solito".
In 2017, the U.S. accounted for 51.1 percent of NATO's combined GDP and 71.7 percent of its combined defense expenditure.
In short, the U.S. contributed more funds to NATO than Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and Canada combined.[/i]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?