Underwriters Laboratories on 9/11 (certifies the steel)

[Jessica]

I'm not familiar with the magazine except for Chertoff's article, so I made no assertions about it.



Go back and check your post. :doh

Chanda -

PM = Popular Mechanics, a silly magazine owned by the Hearst corporation who also owns Redbook, Teen, Seventeen and Cosmopolitan.
They supported the pancake theory when NIST did until NIST posted another report saying it was free fall.
So much for PM being a reliable source of scientific information, I guess.

/hug

 

[Jessica]

Just remember that NIST admitted it could not explain the actual collapse of the towers, and the WTC 7 report was delayed for years, with the admission at one point, "we haven't been able to get a handle on WTC 7." If NIST was so certain there were no explosives, it only needed to test for them to silence the critics, but NIST would not.

See, that bugs me. I remember that one video and article that showed how they manipulated facts to equal what they wanted it to be, like making the free fall time from 3.6 seconds to 5.4.

I guess when it came to building seven, what they meant by not being able to get a handle on it, they were trying to say they could not make the evidence prove their lies.

If they took all the stories and evidence and then could not prove the government story, what is left? hihi explosives. Why not search for explosives to eliminate them? It just doesn't make sense to me, if they're on the level.