Did you come to this conclusion after reading "Interpretations of Current Events for the Simple Minded" or something?
Russia didn't create a civil war.
I have a FIRST HAND grasp on how bad corruption is in Russia and when I make the statement that the Russians are the good guys in comparison to the Ukrainians it is a statement to how bad the Ukrainians are and in no way complimentary towards Russians. If that's a bit too nuanced for you, I understand.No I came to that conclusion after reading your very "simple minded" post where you claimed that the Russians were the "good guys" in the Ukrainian crisis. Judging by your post you also have very little grasp on how bad corruption is in Russia.
I would strongly suggest that you dial back your absurd claims before you start calling anyone "simple minded"
They armed and tactically supported separatist movement in another country, if thats not creating a civil war I dont know what is.
I have a FIRST HAND grasp on how bad corruption is in Russia and when I make the statement that the Russians are the good guys in comparison to the Ukrainians it is a statement to how bad the Ukrainians are and in no way complimentary towards Russians. If that's a bit too nuanced for you, I understand.
I have a FIRST HAND grasp on how bad corruption is in Russia and when I make the statement that the Russians are the good guys in comparison to the Ukrainians it is a statement to how bad the Ukrainians are and in no way complimentary towards Russians. If that's a bit too nuanced for you, I understand.
You can defend Ukraine all you want. As far as I'm concerned the place is a cesspool full of criminals and fascists and is in desperate need of a gigantic enema.Your talking about a country that has invaded its neighbours ( Georgia), created chaos in Ukriane, armed rebels and are constantly invading NATO airspace. They are not the good guys and we need to defend Ukraine.
Name them.
Name them.
Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, Syria, Egypt, Ukraine, Falklands.
You're denying that the US has picked sides, and armed a group on one side of any number of internal conflicts in countries around the world, and the same for the UK, really???
None of that list is an example of US/UK creating a civil war and as for the Falklands don't you respect self-determination?
Well that's just exactly the point. Don't you respect self determination?? Why is it a bad thing when it's eastern Ukrainians that want it, or Bahrainis that want it, but good when Iraqis and Syrians want it. Be consistent.
US/UK you said, when has that collation started a civil war?
Self-determination isnt normally supported by a super-power's troops and weapons, you also need a majority of the population to be in favour of such a move which is not the case in Ukraine.
Here, start here for a prime example of Western (US/UK, and others) proxies in civil war to conduct regime change.
Operation Odyssey Dawn - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It wasn't the case in Syria either. Look, your hypocritical support of self determination over there and opposition to it over here is transparent.
and yet the civil war in Libya had already started before Operation Odyssey started...
Again the civil war was started before we even approached it.
Well then, again, that same argument holds true for Ukraine before Russia approached it.
It's a tragedy that you warmongers never learn lessons from your interference in the internal affairs of other countries. We know you'd never stand for such interference at home, but that's different, right Higgins?
I think you need to research.
"Lessons from Libya: How Not to Intervene"
Lessons from Libya: How Not to Intervene - Harvard - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
... by voting for self determination. Classic!:lol:No because Crimea instigated the conflict.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?