• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S.'s "Press Freedom Ranking" drops due to Trump's media targeting (1 Viewer)

Roadvirus

Heading North
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
48,857
Reaction score
39,823
Location
Tennessee, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Reporters Without Borders released a report Friday accusing the Trump administration of negatively impacting press freedom in the U.S. and lowered the country's ranking on the issue.

<skip

Reporters Without Borders gave the U.S. an overall press freedom score of 65.49, giving the country a ranking similar to nations like Uruguay and Ghana.

The organization accused Trump of having "weaponized institutions, cut support for independent media, and sidelined reporters."

<skip>

Reporters Without Bord
ers accused Trump of encouraging "open disdain for the media," which it claims has caused journalists to face increased risks of "harassment, intimidation and assault while working."


Good going, Trumpy.
 
This should surprise no one, one of the cornerstones of MAGA'ism is aligning itself to something Putin enjoys, going after media and people that disagree.
 
How absurd for them to say this.

I mean, how 'independent' is 'independent media' if they require government support to be 'independent?'

I'm trying to imagine what it would be like to watch 98% of the left sell its soul on all fronts just to back a Democrat. I can't.

I have my tangles over not so much the condemnation of Israel's excess in Gaza, but of purely black/white assessments of the situation that ignore all the whys, the hows, the how else's, etc, the loss of nuance on one issue when they're nuanced on everything else. But I still cannot see them getting remotely close to what the vast bulk of "conservatives" have done under Trump, which is sell every last principle they ever claimed to have short down the river on every issue just to feel like they're stomping the left. It's setting fire to the very townhouse their children live in just because it's gonna burn down the liberals in the other half when it catches.

It's a staggering betrayal of the concept of having a society, a nation, a civilization.


I could never back a Democrat who promises to break everything to own the righties.
 
How absurd for them to say this.

I mean, how 'independent' is 'independent media' if they require government support to be 'independent?'

Funny thing is, there are no restrictions on News Media reporting.

If they lie, misrepresent, misinform, disinform, seek to deceive, or in other words publish Yellow Journalism, it is not a "restriction" to call them out on that kind of crap.
 
How absurd for them to say this.

I mean, how 'independent' is 'independent media' if they require government support to be 'independent?'

Meaning their editorial content is not regulated.
 
Reporters Without Borders released a report Friday accusing the Trump administration of negatively impacting press freedom in the U.S. and lowered the country's ranking on the issue.

<skip

Reporters Without Borders gave the U.S. an overall press freedom score of 65.49, giving the country a ranking similar to nations like Uruguay and Ghana.

The organization accused Trump of having "weaponized institutions, cut support for independent media, and sidelined reporters."

<skip>

Reporters Without Bord
ers accused Trump of encouraging "open disdain for the media," which it claims has caused journalists to face increased risks of "harassment, intimidation and assault while working."


Good going, Trumpy.
Lets give that organization a more accurate name. How about, "Globalist Socialists Activists, NOT Journalists".

As the name implies, the "news" media have destroyed their own credibility by deceptively simping for leftist politicians and corrupt, high ranking bureaucrats, while unfairly vilifying conservative and moderate politicians, especially when their policies actually help people!

Western leftist parties and "journalists" are owned and run by foreign globalist entities and greedy billionaires. As a result, the Democrats and other "liberal" parties are working to end national sovereignty and consolidate our countries into communist regional economic zones where citizens have no rights. The media are helping them achieve this goal.
 
Funny thing is, there are no restrictions on News Media reporting.

If they lie, misrepresent, misinform, disinform, seek to deceive, or in other words publish Yellow Journalism, it is not a "restriction" to call them out on that kind of crap.
The morons on your side of the aisle lap up that 'yellow journalism' and the steady march of an ill-informed populace continues unabated.
 
How absurd for them to say this.

I mean, how 'independent' is 'independent media' if they require government support to be 'independent?'
Ahhh, that special brand of simplistic maga ignorance.
Public media is considered independent because it's typically financed through a mix of public funding (like taxpayer dollars or licensing fees) and private donations, ensuring it's not heavily reliant on government or corporate interests for revenue. This independence allows public media to serve the public interest by providing diverse programming and covering issues that might not be prioritized by commercial outlets.
 
Funny thing is, there are no restrictions on News Media reporting.

If they lie, misrepresent, misinform, disinform, seek to deceive, or in other words publish Yellow Journalism, it is not a "restriction" to call them out on that kind of crap.

It violates the 1st amendment if there were.
Good lord.
 
Lets give that organization a more accurate name. How about, "Globalist Socialists Activists, NOT Journalists".

As the name implies, the "news" media have destroyed their own credibility by deceptively simping for leftist politicians and corrupt, high ranking bureaucrats, while unfairly vilifying conservative and moderate politicians, especially when their policies actually help people!

Western leftist parties and "journalists" are owned and run by foreign globalist entities and greedy billionaires. As a result, the Democrats and other "liberal" parties are working to end national sovereignty and consolidate our countries into communist regional economic zones where citizens have no rights. The media are helping them achieve this goal.
Calling someone or something "socialist" isn't the condemnation or gotcha you seem to believe it is.

All you achieve when you hurl that word is this: you let everyone know you have no actual counter-argument.
 
It violates the 1st amendment if there were.
Good lord.
I don't think you actually know what is in the 1st Amendment. If you did, you wouldn't say what you said.
 
Lets give that organization a more accurate name. How about, "Globalist Socialists Activists, NOT Journalists".

As the name implies, the "news" media have destroyed their own credibility by deceptively simping for leftist politicians and corrupt, high ranking bureaucrats, while unfairly vilifying conservative and moderate politicians, especially when their policies actually help people!

Western leftist parties and "journalists" are owned and run by foreign globalist entities and greedy billionaires. As a result, the Democrats and other "liberal" parties are working to end national sovereignty and consolidate our countries into communist regional economic zones where citizens have no rights. The media are helping them achieve this goal.

Oh come on. Trump puts the Republican Party's largest funder who has tons of conflict of interest in charge of tearing down government programs they don't like and the media reports it like its intended to find "waste, fraud and abuse."

With these things in mind, MSM deserves to be viewed with some suspicion.
 
I despise our MSM because they have shown themselves over and over again to be dishonest and very partisan favoring the Democratic party. They are political hacks. There's a reason the overwhelming majority don't trust them because they have pushed one lie after another. Now people do not believe them.

There's some very good independent media out there that does not require any government funding like PBS and NPR which will soon be short lived.
It is because of the failure of our MSM, these media outlets are growing in popularity.

It is the reason why we need to protect our 1st Amendment at all cost!
 
Last edited:
Reporters Without Borders released a report Friday accusing the Trump administration of negatively impacting press freedom in the U.S. and lowered the country's ranking on the issue.

<skip

Reporters Without Borders gave the U.S. an overall press freedom score of 65.49, giving the country a ranking similar to nations like Uruguay and Ghana.

The organization accused Trump of having "weaponized institutions, cut support for independent media, and sidelined reporters."

<skip>

Reporters Without Bord
ers accused Trump of encouraging "open disdain for the media," which it claims has caused journalists to face increased risks of "harassment, intimidation and assault while working."


Good going, Trumpy.
Completely unsurprising.
 
How absurd for them to say this.

I mean, how 'independent' is 'independent media' if they require government support to be 'independent?'
Independent as in free to report truth/facts.

Hope this helps to clear up your confusion.
 
This:

I despise our MSM because they have shown themselves over and over again to be dishonest and very partisan favoring the Democratic party. They are political hacks. There's a reason the overwhelming majority don't trust them because they have pushed one lie after another. Now people do not believe them.

There's some very good independent media out there that does not require any government funding like PBS and NPR which will soon be short lived.
It is because of the failure of our MSM, these media outlets are growing in popularity.

And this:

It is the reason why we need to protect our 1st Amendment at all cost!

Do not align. You hate the freedom of the press.
 
Funny thing is, there are no restrictions on News Media reporting.

If they lie, misrepresent, misinform, disinform, seek to deceive, or in other words publish Yellow Journalism, it is not a "restriction" to call them out on that kind of crap.
Defamation isn’t protected by 1A.

Traitor Trump, even while in office, isn’t immune to a civil lawsuit for defamation.

A shame that no journalist/news organization hasn’t already sued Traitor Trump.
 
Reporters Without Borders released a report Friday accusing the Trump administration of negatively impacting press freedom in the U.S. and lowered the country's ranking on the issue.

<skip

Reporters Without Borders gave the U.S. an overall press freedom score of 65.49, giving the country a ranking similar to nations like Uruguay and Ghana.

The organization accused Trump of having "weaponized institutions, cut support for independent media, and sidelined reporters."

<skip>

Reporters Without Bord
ers accused Trump of encouraging "open disdain for the media," which it claims has caused journalists to face increased risks of "harassment, intimidation and assault while working."


Good going, Trumpy.
Did the press freedom score include how the media lied to the entire country for 3.5 years telling us Biden was fine cognitively and it was just his stutter?
 
This should surprise no one, one of the cornerstones of MAGA'ism is aligning itself to something Putin enjoys, going after media and people that disagree.

Stripping AP's access privileges over his stupid "Gulf of America" shit pretty much told us how the press was going to be treated in Trump Admin 2.0
 
Did the press freedom score include how the media lied to the entire country for 3.5 years telling us Biden was fine cognitively and it was just his stutter?

This is about Freedom of the Press. Not Reliability of the Press.

Reading is a very helpful skill.
 
Reporters Without Borders released a report Friday accusing the Trump administration of negatively impacting press freedom in the U.S. and lowered the country's ranking on the issue.

<skip

Reporters Without Borders gave the U.S. an overall press freedom score of 65.49, giving the country a ranking similar to nations like Uruguay and Ghana.

The organization accused Trump of having "weaponized institutions, cut support for independent media, and sidelined reporters."

<skip>

Reporters Without Bord
ers accused Trump of encouraging "open disdain for the media," which it claims has caused journalists to face increased risks of "harassment, intimidation and assault while working."


Good going, Trumpy.
We don't really need any of the lefty media lies.
 
Lets give that organization a more accurate name. How about, "Globalist Socialists Activists, NOT Journalists".

As the name implies, the "news" media have destroyed their own credibility by deceptively simping for leftist politicians and corrupt, high ranking bureaucrats, while unfairly vilifying conservative and moderate politicians, especially when their policies actually help people!

Western leftist parties and "journalists" are owned and run by foreign globalist entities and greedy billionaires. As a result, the Democrats and other "liberal" parties are working to end national sovereignty and consolidate our countries into communist regional economic zones where citizens have no rights. The media are helping them achieve this goal.

blah blah blah

This isn't about media credibility. This is about media freedom...as in "not being restricted by the State".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom