I wouldn't.
And not only that, we sure as wouldn't hear all the crying about it from the folks who are trippin' over this BS.
It doesn't and I never said it did.
My point, again, is that if Trijicon loses the contract and it's re-awarded to another maker, it's possible that the second contractor could turn out a substandard unit, causing out soldiers to lose their edge on the battlefield.
if you are so offended, I suggest you take a piece of steel wool and remove the inscriptions.The rifle sights will work just fine without the inscription. It will save American lives without the inscription. It will kill bad guys without the inscription.
It doesn't and I never said it did.
My point, again, is that if Trijicon loses the contract and it's re-awarded to another maker, it's possible that the second contractor could turn out a substandard unit, causing out soldiers to lose their edge on the battlefield.
And you still don't get it. I think you're being intentionally evasive.
I don't give a damn what the inscription says or which bible it's from. It's a religious inscription being paid for with taxpayer funds.
The job of our military is to defend this great nation. The military accepts volunteers of all religious denominations. No religion should be promoted above another. Especially when we're all footing the bill for it.
I don't want the contractor to lose the contract either. But the religious inscription is not needed. They're endorsing a specific religion. And they're doing it on our dime.
I think I trust our military in their choice of a good contractor. Whether it is Trijicon or not, they want our soldiers to have an edge and wouldn't put substandard equipment in their hands.
Sure it does.That idea makes no sense.
Obviously, you've never served in the military. That's not a shot at you, but anyone who has served in the military is well aware that the military has a nack for buying ****ty equipment.
Which is false.It's really not a question of adding costs, or even of religious symbols paid for by tax money. It is the symolism that the war is a modern day crusade.
Well, that may very well be. I assumed that they had higher standards for our soldiers, but I could be wrong. I agree, though, that having a tiny code in the serial number that references the bible isn't that big of a deal. I do find it rather humorous, though.
U.S. Military Weapons Inscribed With Secret Codes
Pentagon Supplier for Rifle Sights Says It Has 'Always' Added New Testament References
By JOSEPH RHEE, TAHMAN BRADLEY and BRIAN ROSS
Jan. 18, 2010 —
Coded references to New Testament Bible passages about Jesus Christ are inscribed on high-powered rifle sights provided to the United States military by a Michigan company, an ABC News investigation has found.
The sights are used by U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and in the training of Iraqi and Afghan soldiers. The maker of the sights, Trijicon, has a $660 million multi-year contract to provide up to 800,000 sights to the Marine Corps, and additional contracts to provide sights to the U.S. Army.
U.S. military rules specifically prohibit the proselytizing of any religion in Iraq or Afghanistan and were drawn up in order to prevent criticism that the U.S. was embarked on a religious "Crusade" in its war against al Qaeda and Iraqi insurgents.
<snip>
Spokespeople for the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps both said their services were unaware of the biblical markings. They said officials were discussing what steps, if any, to take in the wake of the ABCNews.com report. It is not known how many Trijicon sights are currently in use by the U.S. military.
The biblical references appear in the same type font and size as the model numbers on the company's Advanced Combat Optical Guides, called the ACOG.
It's really not a question of adding costs, or even of religious symbols paid for by tax money. It is the symolism that the war is a modern day crusade.
Is it a modern day crusade? Are we, in fact, at war with Islam?
Can you imagine an all out war between Christians and Muslims, ala middle ages?:shock:
Is Christianity a religion of war?
One can only dream of it......:gunner:
Why was that?A prime example is the Bradley. When the earlier generations were designed they were fitted with a potable water tank inside the troop compartment. It was discovered that there was no way to properly clean the tank, because of it's configuration. They figured that when a whole battalion of soldiers in Germany came down with a case of amoebic disentary. The punchline, was that we couldn't throw them away. They had to remain with the vehicle.
Which is false.
Why was that?
Oh well, **** happens. Deal with it :lol: :2wave:
Ooh, ooh, here's another great example of good intentions paving the road to hell.
The swim barrier on the Bradley that was supposed to make it amphibious. See the soldiers riding in top the hull? yeah, they're up there because the vehicle was liable to sink. Also, the main gun couldn't be fired with the swim barrier erected. It was basically a joke.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?