- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Using that logic, you can justify any illegal act by pointing and saying "Well they do worse". The Marine Corp knows this which is why the Marine Corp denounced the act as being against what the Marine Corp expects of it's Marines.
As much as you hate to see it, it was wrong.
So to you raping children is the same as pissing on the corpse of terrorists.....
Using that logic, you can justify any illegal act by pointing and saying "Well they do worse". The Marine Corp knows this which is why the Marine Corp denounced the act as being against what the Marine Corp expects of it's Marines.
As much as you hate to see it, it was wrong.
Why is peeing on a body wrong but putting holes in the body with bullets OK?
I seriously don't understand the logic behind those thinking that what they did was "dishonorable".
Who here agrees we should shoot this thread and then pee on it? :mrgreen:
Exactly if your going to kill her anyway why not rape her first. Killing is worse than rape. Your logic is flawless.
Who here agrees we should shoot this thread and then pee on it? :mrgreen:
So you are going with the two wrongs way of thinking? See a problem with that yet? I doubt it...
Hey we are killing her and peeing on her anyway why is it wrong to rape her? It's war man.
I like and value my computer too much...
Yeah... I didn't think that you understood. All good buddy.
I understand very well. If we are killing them anyway that justifies anything else we do. Whether its corpse desecration or using them to release some sexual frustration. Who cares they are terrorists anyway.
It could help moral as then female U.S. soldiers are less likely to get raped.
So there are SOME things you wouldn't do? I wouldn't do it with yours, let alone mine. I value my self-respect too much.
Wrong. It does not justify anything else that we do.
Killing in war is legal.
I have read a few state laws about corpse desecration and can't find anything about urinating on the body as being illegal.
Rape? That is illegal. And even if urinating on the corpse is illegal, you again have the conflicting idea that it is ok to shoot the person, just not to pee on the person.
Oh so your saying the Marines were wrong to pee in the corpse.
Nope. What's next?
See since we are going to kill them might as well have fun while doing it. Those marines have needs so its ok to rape the terrorists first.
So you don't really have much of an argument then? Fine. Nothing illegal about behaviour and certainly nothing worthy of being dishonorable. Cool.
Hey if we are going to kill them anyway and they are terrorists then it just doesn't matter. Rape, corpse desecration, whatever, its all cool. That's all I am hearing. Go for it boys, and girls. The pics of the white girl at abu grab were awesome. If we don't care about decency all instances then decency doesn't exist.
Hey if we are going to kill them anyway and they are terrorists then it just doesn't matter. Rape, corpse desecration, whatever, its all cool. That's all I am hearing. Go for it boys, and girls. The pics of the white girl at abu grab were awesome. If we don't care about decency all instances then decency doesn't exist.
Nice to know you're sinking to the level of the terrorists.
Tell me, are you really just a hormone-charged kid? If you're not, your behavior demonstrates that you have some sick ideas and have no idea what war is like.
War is hell I get it. That's why the people say the desecration of the corpses was ok. They were terrorists, war is hell, and killing them was worse and we kill in war.
So if we can use those to justify one thing we can use them to justify other things too. Like a little sexual recreation. It's war and their terrorists and we are going to kill them anyway. If it offends them it doesn't matter they do the same thing. So if they can rape Laura Logan we can rape them. See how that works.
Where did I say he isn't ALLOWED to criticize anyone? I just said that his comment of saying that people disagreeing with pissing on dead bodies is "aiding and abetting the enemy" is wrong.
Do you need hoooked on phonics or something?
calling free speech aiding and abetting the enemy is just plain stupid.
Do you need hoooked on phonics or something?
Moderator's Warning: |
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?