- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 2,921
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Why do you post LNS12000000 numbers for Obama but post CES0500000001 Numbers for Bush? In my world that's called comparing apples to oranges. :liar
I keep on hearing more good job news, every day.
Yep, I'll bet unemployment is down to 8% by June...mayb even March.
Help me out here, Con ... what am I missing? You claim we had 52 consecutive months of job growth but when I look at the numbers you posted, the most I see is 8 consecutive months.
.Why do you post LNS12000000 numbers for Obama but post CES0500000001 Numbers for Bush? In my world that's called comparing apples to oranges. :liar
I've shown this to you before, you must have ignored what I posted which was neatly formatted with a table. On report CES0500000001 start with Feb 2010 and check the subsequent 21 months and you will see numbers getting bigger. If you use the 1-Month Net Change option you can see easily see it..
Use the same chart for Obama and tell me that there has been 21 straight months of private sector job growth
a) the article you quoted from said nothing about it being from the private sector; and b) that's still not 52 consecutive weeks.You are missing the private sector job growth which isn't surprising. Why don't you just admit who you are?
Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)
Original Data Value
Series Id: CES0500000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector: Total private
Industry: Total private
NAICS Code: -
Data Type: ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS
Years: 2001 to 2011
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2001 111634 111624 111555 111227 111146 110910 110737 110544 110276 109918 109575 109368
2002 109214 109054 108989 108892 108814 108824 108732 108671 108659 108772 108758 108595
2003 108640 108484 108286 108252 108274 108233 108231 108266 108421 108570 108611 108724
2004 108882 108913 109213 109437 109747 109841 109883 109984 110135 110465 110493 110624
2005 110718 110949 111095 111441 111583 111847 112122 112311 112392 112492 112796 112934
2006 113247 113533 113795 113961 113965 114049 114200 114347 114432 114438 114628 114803
2007 114993 115051 115251 115308 115419 115469 115486 115391 115396 115470 115568 115606
2008 115610 115482 115395 115209 114969 114752 114487 114170 113736 113245 112458 111822
2009 110981 110260 109473 108700 108374 107936 107649 107434 107221 106971 106937 106835
2010 106793 106772 106916 107145 107193 107258 107351 107461 107570 107713 107841 108008
2011 108102 108363 108582 108823 108922 108997 109170 109242 109462 109579 109719
.
Use the same chart for Obama and tell me that there has been 21 straight months of private sector job growth
Not the Dems, the evangelicals. Before he can run against Obama, he has to get the nomination. Evangelicals, the Christian Right, wouldn't vote for a Democrat if he were running against Voldemort.
They might not vote for Obama ... and they might not vote at all if the choice is between Obama and a member of a cult.
a) the article you quoted from said nothing about it being from the private sector; and b) that's still not 52 consecutive weeks.
I've shown this to you before, you must have ignored what I posted which was neatly formatted with a table. On report CES0500000001 start with Feb 2010 and check the subsequent 21 months and you will see numbers getting bigger. If you use the 1-Month Net Change option you can see easily see it.
As for your numbers that you highlighted in red - that's your basic housing bubble.
Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National) | |
1-Month Net Change | |
Series Id: | CES0500000001 |
Seasonally Adjusted | |
Super Sector: | Total private |
Industry: | Total private |
NAICS Code: | - |
Data Type: | ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS |
Years: | 2009 to 2011 |
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
2009 | -841 | -721 | -787 | -773 | -326 | -438 | -287 | -215 | -213 | -250 | -34 | -102 |
2010 | -42 | -21 | 144 | 229 | 48 | 65 | 93 | 110 | 109 | 143 | 128 | 167 |
2011 | 94 | 261 | 219 | 241 | 99 | 75 | 173 | 72 | 220 | 117 | 140 |
21 straight months of private sector growth. March 2010 - Present
Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the
Current Employment Statistics survey (National)1-Month Net Change Series Id: CES0500000001 Seasonally Adjusted Super Sector: Total private Industry: Total private NAICS Code: - Data Type: ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS Years: 2009 to 2011
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 -841 -721 -787 -773 -326 -438 -287 -215 -213 -250 -34 -102 2010 -42 -21 144 229 48 65 93 110 109 143 128 167 2011 94 261 219 241 99 75 173 72 220 117 140
Labor Force 2011 153186 153246 153406 153421 153693 153421 153228 153594 154017 154198 153883
UE 2011 w/o DW-U-3 9.05% 8.92% 8.83% 8.96% 9.05% 9.18% 9.09% 9.09% 9.08% 9.01% 8.64%
UE 2011 with DW 9.70% 9.59% 9.43% 9.60% 9.59% 9.82% 9.82% 9.73% 9.76% 9.64% 9.36%
2011 U-6 rate % 16.1 15.9 15.7 15.9 15.8 16.2 16.1 16.2 16.5 16.2 15.6
How can anyone support this arrogant ass?...
because his two most viable Republican alternatives are a wanna-be Fascist and a Mormon flip-flopper?
Vs a leftwing socialist with zero management experience?....
this is 2011....not 2008.
Vs a leftwing socialist with zero management experience? you are entitled to your opinion but the Obama results indicate that either would be better than what we have now.
And he has learned nothing in the past 3 years...
He as more experience as President than any other candidate.
So if you are going to vote on experience.......
He has been in the office for 3 years now and has shown zero leadership skills. leaders don't blame others which is all he does. Being in office hasn't created any skills at all. he sill blames everyone else and takes credit for what he hasn't done. His numbers speak for themselves.
oh, he has learned quite a lot over the last three years. Mostly that the GOP cares more about getting him out of office than helping the country.
Then why try yo use the experience argument if that is what you think?
He has been in the office for 3 years now and has shown zero leadership skills....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?