- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 45,353
- Reaction score
- 57,829
- Location
- AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Kerplunk.
Recall that thread I started earlier this week about only 37k jobs being added by the private sector?
Yeah, more bad news. It appears Taco Trump has ****ed things up.
View attachment 67572960
I guess the good news is that some states saw slow growth!
Kerplunk.
Recall that thread I started earlier this week about only 37k jobs being added by the private sector?
Yeah, more bad news. It appears Taco Trump has ****ed things up.
View attachment 67572960
I guess the good news is that some states saw slow growth!
Can you expand on that thought a bit?Not just Trump.
This is what the Fed has been working for the past couple of years.
Oh they will if Trump doesn't end this tariff crap.I hope that a bunch more people don't lose their jobs. The edolf bullshit was bad enough.
Can you expand on that thought a bit?
You seemed to be insinuating that the Fed has been working towards ****ing up the economy for the past couple years. The article you just posted doesn't seem to reflect that so perhaps I misunderstood what you were trying to say.Really? Are you new to the US and it's economy?
![]()
Despite Trump's pressure, Federal Reserve likely to keep rates unchanged this week
The Federal Reserve will likely keep its key short-term interest rate unchanged on Wednesday, despite harsh criticism from President Donald Trump and his demand that the Fed reduce borrowing costs.www.pbs.org
You seemed to be insinuating that the Fed has been working towards ****ing up the economy for the past couple years. The article you just posted doesn't seem to reflect that so perhaps I misunderstood what you were trying to say.
It seemed a legitimate question on my part, so your snarky response isn't exactly appreciated. If you can defend your original comment than please do that or don't but keep your attitude to yourself.
I did read the article. I'm aware they have been trying to slow the economy to get inflation under control. Were you implying that action is the reason for the stalled economy? Do you disagree with the feds response to inflation? What actions would you rather see the fed take to control inflation and prime the economy?If you read this article or did a search you would see the Fed has been working to slow the economy for the past several years.
While Trump's tariffs could be negative for the economy I don't see how they've had an affect yet. Except on planning and emotional reaction.
Reducing interest rates when there are legitimate concerns of inflation rising over the next few months seems like a bad idea. That seems like a prudent approach by the Fed to me. @L88 appears to believe we should hurt our economy further going into the next quarter when economic turmoil is likely to hit consumers.You seemed to be insinuating that the Fed has been working towards ****ing up the economy for the past couple years. The article you just posted doesn't seem to reflect that so perhaps I misunderstood what you were trying to say.
It seemed a legitimate question on my part, so your snarky response isn't exactly appreciated. If you can defend your original comment than please do that or don't but keep your attitude to yourself.
Reducing interest rates when there are legitimate concerns of inflation rising over the next few months seems like a bad idea. That seems like a prudent approach by the Fed to me. @L88 seems to think we should hurt our economy further going into the next quarter when economic turmoil is likely to hit consumers.
The implication came through the article you linked. If that was not what you meant to imply, please use your words to explain.Where did I express an opinion on what interest rates should do?
I gathered the same impression as @Xilnik did. It seems we both misunderstood you. I think the fed has been doing a decent job with the tools at their disposal. I don't think the recent stall in the economy is the result of the feds actions with interest rates.Where did I express an opinion on what interest rates should do?
Yeah, MAGA wants to blame everyone except the actual person who is causing this issue.I gathered the same impression as @Xilnik did. It seems we both misunderstood you. I think the fed has been doing a decent job with the tools at their disposal. I don't think the recent stall in the economy is the result of the feds actions with interest rates.
In fact I would suggest the Fed was responsible for keeping the States out of a possible recession and engineered a " soft landing"I gathered the same impression as @Xilnik did. It seems we both misunderstood you. I think the fed has been doing a decent job with the tools at their disposal. I don't think the recent stall in the economy is the result of the feds actions with interest rates.
So CEO's saying they can't act because the govt is completely unpredictable with it's trade policies has nothing to do with Trumps tariffs?If you read this article or did a search you would see the Fed has been working to slow the economy for the past several years.
While Trump's tariffs could be negative for the economy I don't see how they've had an affect yet. Except on planning and emotional reaction.
And I find your question snarky.
Double lol.